vpFREE2 Forums

STATE OF THE UNION....or Casino Visit?

As usual, a lot of wind but not a single, solitary fact to back up
your statement.
Bill O'Reiley a fine catholic, Jesus Christ should strike you down
on that one. I heard the released tapes and it wasn't the skirt that
was spewing obsenities and profanity. Love your hero's rob.
Personally, I think M. Jackson is a child molester. He got off just
like OJ did $$$. Just like O'Reiley did $$$. They should all be
doing time. I'm surprised that you admire Jesus, he was broke and
took charity. He was also a liberal. Bush is a moron.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> My research showed ABC being #1. Not that I doubt your honesty

(ha-

> ha-ha) but if you could provide a little proof, that would be
> appreciated.

Just as I expected, you throw out what you believe are facts in a
deceptive sort of way. ABC is #1....of the Networks. Fox is #1 in

cable

and overall. There's talk that the network news won't last the

decade.

I don't see the need to look up something that'll waste my time.
Besides, little dicky will do that for us!

O'reiley is a windbag sex pervert. Just your type of
> hero. As more and more critiques come in w's SOTU address is

being

> touted as self-serving, distorted views. Didn't you say year

before

> last that OBL would be caught right before the election?

O'Reilly is a fine Catholic gentleman living in a conservative

area of

Long Island who, because of his fame, was chased by a short skirt

at

Fox. Even Michael Jackson gets accused of things he doesn't do.

I said OBL would be caught before the NEXT election--in a few

years. I

don't remember saying it before last election. See if you can get

the

dicker to research that too.

I just saw a CBS far left network poll that showed 73% felt GWB's

SOTU

had true bite with no giving into the radical left. And most

agreed to

force Iran to stand down. Walter Cronkite is probably chattering

his

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@> wrote:
false teeth right about now.

You want the proof do the research. I know enough about it without
doing geek work to bring you up to speed. That's dicky the denyer's
job.

If O'Reilly did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind bars
right now where he should be if that's the case. Critics naturally
make up stuff about him, and just like the story is with Bush-
haters, he oblivious to all the phony charges and bad-mouthing. All
that matters to listeners is that he's #1, has been for over 4
years, and will continue to be for many more. As your favorite Air
America liberal whiner's radio network quickly goes down the tubes
due to no listeners, he'll have even more listeners.

MJ & OJ were both proven innocent by juries that were there for
every moment of every person who testified. How is it you know more
than the juries? GO JUICE!! God Bless the GREAT & Honorable GWB!!!

As usual, a lot of wind but not a single, solitary fact to back up
your statement.
Bill O'Reiley a fine catholic, Jesus Christ should strike you down
on that one. I heard the released tapes and it wasn't the skirt

that

was spewing obsenities and profanity. Love your hero's rob.
Personally, I think M. Jackson is a child molester. He got off

just

like OJ did $$$. Just like O'Reiley did $$$. They should all be
doing time. I'm surprised that you admire Jesus, he was broke and
took charity. He was also a liberal. Bush is a moron.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@>

wrote:

> >
> > My research showed ABC being #1. Not that I doubt your honesty
(ha-
> > ha-ha) but if you could provide a little proof, that would be
> > appreciated.
>
> Just as I expected, you throw out what you believe are facts in

a

> deceptive sort of way. ABC is #1....of the Networks. Fox is #1

in

cable
> and overall. There's talk that the network news won't last the
decade.
> I don't see the need to look up something that'll waste my time.
> Besides, little dicky will do that for us!
>
> O'reiley is a windbag sex pervert. Just your type of
> > hero. As more and more critiques come in w's SOTU address is
being
> > touted as self-serving, distorted views. Didn't you say year
before
> > last that OBL would be caught right before the election?
>
> O'Reilly is a fine Catholic gentleman living in a conservative
area of
> Long Island who, because of his fame, was chased by a short

skirt

at
> Fox. Even Michael Jackson gets accused of things he doesn't do.
>
> I said OBL would be caught before the NEXT election--in a few
years. I
> don't remember saying it before last election. See if you can

get

the
> dicker to research that too.
>
> I just saw a CBS far left network poll that showed 73% felt

GWB's

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@...> wrote:

SOTU
> had true bite with no giving into the radical left. And most
agreed to
> force Iran to stand down. Walter Cronkite is probably chattering
his
> false teeth right about now.
>

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> > Fuego's? HA! When it was Tusks it was something special. Now

it's

> > nothing but another joint inside one of those locals dumps you
> > frequent. It oughta be free given the quality.
>
> I guess not being someplace makes you an expert. Is that why you
> claim to know so much>

I've been to it and was disgusted.

It was pretty bad for awhile. Much improved over the last 6 months.
Isn't it nice to know that you've been trumped by me ... again.

>
> > It's time he got to the business of laying the groundwork for

his

> > future legendary status, and that's exactly what he's doing.
> As "The
> > Father of Our Fight Against Terrorism" he has to put aside some
> > issues and work on his legacy.
>
> I wonder when "Dad" is going to get started?
>
> > > I think I'll believe Harry's summary. Did you spend the

entire

> > > evening on your knees with that mesmerized look in you eyes.
> >
> > No, but I spent it with my 2-yr.-old granddaughter who was
> absolutely mesmerized by the stature of a great president, and my
wife & son-in-law and daughter all understood my positions that I
sometimes tell them about. They know I know what I'm talking about,
>
> ROTFLMAO.

Is that the laughing thing you're struggling with explaining?

No struggle. I suspect your granddaughter was "mesmerized" by you
constantly licking the TV screen.

> > and they realize
> > that, like most Americans, you have to put trust in the hands

of

> > those elected in a democracy. They also know those who disagree
or
> > protest are a bunch of low life losers who criticize for the

sake

> of
> > criticizing, and that Teddy Kennedy--GWB's chief rival--is a
> murderer
> > who got away with it because of wealth and power.
>
> Ted Kennedy is an ELECTED senator. What happened to "put trust in
the hands of those elected in a democracy"? You can't go one single
> sentence without contradicting yourself. Put the clown mask back
on, please, it is so fitting.

And he's also a murderer that got away with it.

Doesn't change the fact you contradicted yourself in the very next
sentence. You must really love looking like a moron, you do it so
often.

Some would say GWB is a "murderer that got away with it". A charge
that might stand up in some courts.

> > >
> > > > While you and your cowardly,
> > > > traiterous pal John 3-royals were praising OBL and that

other

> > > fanatic's
> > > > videos/audios from the past few weeks -- essentially being
more
> > > willing
> > > > to give up rather than fight on to eliminate these maniacs
> > >
> > > It would be nice if we actually spent a lot more resources
going
> > > after OBL. That's where you and I differ. You'd rather fight

a

> > > meaningless war then go after the real threat. Why do you

think

> > they keep helping the insurgents? It helps them recruit more
bodies
> > while keeps them safe and sound far away from the action. The
> > terrorists really do appreciate your hero.
> >
> > On the contrary. In my comments last night I said we should

just

go
> > to the Afghan-Pakistani border and set off a dozen nukes

that'll

> kill
> > most or all of the Al-Q leaders.
>
> Or ... maybe just kill a lot of innocent people, give Muslims

good

> reasons to hate America, create a few thousand more OBLs, and

give

> America a black eye in the rest of the world that would be
impossible to remove. Good idea, moron.

Typical twisted and cowardly logic. If we don't create millions of
collateral victims while blasting the terrorist leaders into Allah-
land over there, you and I will become THEIR collateral damage over
here.

Another completely illogical statement. You do this so often and
don't even realize it. I guess that what happens when you have NO
facts to back up your childish assertions.

>
> > We don't know where they're hidden
> > but we know they're there somewhere. Bury them alive or blow

them

> to
> > bits. So what if we kill millions of innocents--simple

casualties

> of
> > war, and almost every one of them in that area will be put out

of

> > their misery anyway. The main purpose after the kill? No
remaining
> Al-
> > Q will mess with our country again. They only understand and
> respect
> > viscious violence, and they use our coddled, pacifist ways
against
> us while they slowly peel away. One BIG message would eliminate

the

> > threat forever.
>
> Are you really this naive? It would NOT remove the threat.

Instead,

> it would multiply the threat 100 times over. You really should

try

> using that wasted space above your neck every now and then. Have
you ever read a history book in your life?

Your position is that of most sissified scardy cats in the country.

No, my position is actually much closer to GWBs' position then your
idiotic "nuke em" plan. So, it appears you think GWB is a "scardy
cat".

You're afraid that your daily visits to degenerate casinos would be
disrupted, or you might have to hold a gun for a change. Explain
where the 'threat' would come from if we wiped out their leaders,

The other billion Muslims.

killed millions of their followers, and made the firm statement

that

any further terror attacks would lead to more innocent Islamic
destruction in the effort to kill the hiding wussies amongst them.
That's what they understand. Violence. Hit the schools and mosques
where the terrorists hide like yellow cowards. No conscience---just
like them!

We already know you have no conscience. Otherwise you'd have quit
abusing your family long ago. No one is suprised that you'd take the
same approach to the rest of the world. Unfortunately, the world
would be unliveable after your solution ... or maybe you think
nuclear winter would be an improvement?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

If O'Reilly did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind bars
right now where he should be if that's the case.

Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is Robbie
contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.

So, I guess you will be kissing Ted Kennedy's ass now. Trouble with
being found not guilty in a criminal case is that there is that pesky
civil suit which usually follows. OJ, M. Jackson and O'Raunchy all
paid plenty in civil court or settlements before the civil trial.
O'Raunchy, the sex pervert went so far as to seal the deal so no one
would know much it set him back.
So now I under stand, you are afraid of facts, won't look for proof.
People are supposed to believe you because you say it's true. Who do
you think you are, GWB. I think that there is a possibility that you
may be illiterate, can't read or write. Do you pay some 5th grader to
read posts and write that inane GT column? Wouldn't doubt it. If you
are too busy to research what you call facts then fuck you. Ban me
admin, I don't give a shit. I'm an adult and this is an adult forum. I
have a right not to be censored. Singer, you dick, I'm gone til you
can make a logical statement and prove it.
John
P.S.- Has anyone seen my Constitutional right to free sprrch??

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> If O'Reilly did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind bars
> right now where he should be if that's the case.

Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is Robbie
contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.

.> > > > Fuego's? HA! When it was Tusks it was something special. Now

it's
> > > nothing but another joint inside one of those locals dumps

you

> > > frequent. It oughta be free given the quality.
> >
> > I guess not being someplace makes you an expert. Is that why

you

> > claim to know so much>
>
> I've been to it and was disgusted.

It was pretty bad for awhile. Much improved over the last 6 months.
Isn't it nice to know that you've been trumped by me ... again.

The only people who go to it now are degenerate locals like you and
Mrs. addict, and they make believe it's the gourmet meal of a
lifetime. Those type dufuses enjoy low-life buffets, greasy spoon
cafes, and quick in-and-out type joints just so they can get their
gambling in with as little interruption as possible.

> > > > I think I'll believe Harry's summary. Did you spend the
entire
> > > > evening on your knees with that mesmerized look in you eyes.
> > >
> > > No, but I spent it with my 2-yr.-old granddaughter who was
> > absolutely mesmerized by the stature of a great president, and

my

> wife & son-in-law and daughter all understood my positions that I
> sometimes tell them about. They know I know what I'm talking

about,

> >
> > ROTFLMAO.
>
> Is that the laughing thing you're struggling with explaining?

No struggle. I suspect your granddaughter was "mesmerized" by you
constantly licking the TV screen.

She can't reach it yet.

> > > and they realize
> > > that, like most Americans, you have to put trust in the hands
of those elected in a democracy. They also know those who disagree
> or protest are a bunch of low life losers who criticize for the
sake of criticizing, and that Teddy Kennedy--GWB's chief rival--is

a murderer who got away with it because of wealth and power.

> >
> > Ted Kennedy is an ELECTED senator. What happened to "put trust

in

> the hands of those elected in a democracy"? You can't go one

single

> > sentence without contradicting yourself. Put the clown mask

back

> on, please, it is so fitting.
>
> And he's also a murderer that got away with it.

Doesn't change the fact you contradicted yourself in the very next
sentence. You must really love looking like a moron, you do it so
often.

I didn't vote for the fat boy so why would you corrupt my input as
having anything whatsoever to do with such a criminal?

Some would say GWB is a "murderer that got away with it". A charge
that might stand up in some courts.

Then let's put $10k on that right now! More facts little dicky? then
back it up!! I'll even give you the number----ONE court. If even ONE
court convicts him and sends him away, you win! Otherwise, it's just
that same 'ol feel-good nonsense you're famous for.

> > > On the contrary. In my comments last night I said we should
just go to the Afghan-Pakistani border and set off a dozen nukes
that'll kill most or all of the Al-Q leaders.
> >
> > Or ... maybe just kill a lot of innocent people, give Muslims
good reasons to hate America, create a few thousand more OBLs, and
give
> > America a black eye in the rest of the world that would be
> impossible to remove. Good idea, moron.
>
> Typical twisted and cowardly logic. If we don't create millions

of

> collateral victims while blasting the terrorist leaders into

Allah-land over there, you and I will become THEIR collateral damage
over here.

Another completely illogical statement. You do this so often and
don't even realize it. I guess that what happens when you have NO
facts to back up your childish assertions.

I noticed you stopped cold when it was time to explain your nonsense.
I won't push and make you sweat for now. But here's another piece of
reality for you to stew over. Actially, two.
1) Today God blessed the world by sinking a shithole ferry between
Egypt & Saudi Arabia. 1000 possible Islamist extremists eliminated.
2) Denmark publishes a picture of the Maniacal Muslim Prophet with a
bomb as a turbin, causing world-wide Muslim protests, violence, and
crazed reactions. Just like with you, the truth sets them off. If the
LIVING Pope was drawn with his dick in his hand, do you think HIS
followers would react in such moronic proportions? There's a good
reason for you to wake up and realize that the only good Muslim is a
dead Muslim. You can't just sit back and negotiate with such animals,
you can't expect to wage wars with every country in which they hide,
and you can't worry about killing ten thousand of them just to get
one or two fanatical leaders. They represent such a poor, downtrodden
slice of society that they have nothing to lose by rebelling after a
leader is destroyed.

> >
> > > We don't know where they're hidden
> > > but we know they're there somewhere. Bury them alive or blow
them to bits. So what if we kill millions of innocents--simple
casualties of war, and almost every one of them in that area will

be put out of their misery anyway. The main purpose after the kill?
No remaining Al-Q will mess with our country again. They only
understand and respect

> > > viscious violence, and they use our coddled, pacifist ways
> against us while they slowly peel away. One BIG message would

eliminate the threat forever.

> >
> > Are you really this naive? It would NOT remove the threat.
Instead,
> > it would multiply the threat 100 times over. You really should
try
> > using that wasted space above your neck every now and then.

Have

> you ever read a history book in your life?
>
> Your position is that of most sissified scardy cats in the

country.

No, my position is actually much closer to GWBs' position then your
idiotic "nuke em" plan. So, it appears you think GWB is a "scardy
cat".

Where'd you pull that out of? First, you're position is one of
cowardice. Does the great GWB sound like a back-off coward to you??

> You're afraid that your daily visits to degenerate casinos would

be

> disrupted, or you might have to hold a gun for a change. Explain
> where the 'threat' would come from if we wiped out their leaders,

The other billion Muslims.

One billion Muslims against a super-power. You need to brush up on
modern warfare.

> killed millions of their followers, and made the firm statement
that
> any further terror attacks would lead to more innocent Islamic
> destruction in the effort to kill the hiding wussies amongst

them.

> That's what they understand. Violence. Hit the schools and

mosques

> where the terrorists hide like yellow cowards. No conscience---

just

> like them!

We already know you have no conscience.

So you agree that's the ONLY way to deal with these barbarians. Good.
You have a conscience, you lose.

Otherwise you'd have quit

abusing your family long ago. No one is suprised that you'd take

the

same approach to the rest of the world. Unfortunately, the world
would be unliveable after your solution ... or maybe you think
nuclear winter would be an improvement?

In a one-sided event like this, who cares what happens 'over there'?
Saving this country is the only thing that matters. Maybe you're OK
with losing Cleveland or SF or NYC, as a method of making peace with
these losers. With you in charge that's just what would happen--
they'd have the time and the resources to go ahead with it. BOOM!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

Fact: Kennedy KILLED Mary Jo Kopeckne, and his family helped sway law
enforcement to wash it all away. No money was paid to anyone.

Fact: O'Reilly was ACCUSED of SAYING things that were never
substantiated. O'Reilly countersued the accuser. No money is known to
have exchanged hands. For as many people that say O'Reilly paid the
broad off, there's twicew as many who believe she paid HIM off---
whether it be in the form of money or a blow job, doesn't matter.

Whoops little dicky.....sorry to make you eat crow YET AGAIN.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> If O'Reilly did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind bars
> right now where he should be if that's the case.

Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is Robbie
contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.

Re: O'Reilly: No money changed hands--see my previous post....unless
you can do what you're not too good at these days. PROVE IT! But be
careful. You might find the cash went in the other direction.

Who cares what MJ pays or doesn't pay. And I like how OJ handles his
beef with Goldstein of Goldman or Goldilocks or whatever that money-
hungry kike (yes little dicky, that's the right word for it when a
person cares about money first and then his daughter last) went
after. The Pension can't be touched! HAHAHA!!! Goldilocks!! OJ was
innocent anyway, so where's the question.

How many times can a hairy-armpit lapper like you say "I'm gone" and
not be for real? A little credibility problem perhaps??

So, I guess you will be kissing Ted Kennedy's ass now. Trouble with
being found not guilty in a criminal case is that there is that

pesky

civil suit which usually follows. OJ, M. Jackson and O'Raunchy all
paid plenty in civil court or settlements before the civil trial.
O'Raunchy, the sex pervert went so far as to seal the deal so no

one would know much it set him back.

So now I under stand, you are afraid of facts, won't look for

proof.

People are supposed to believe you because you say it's true. Who

do

you think you are, GWB. I think that there is a possibility that

you

may be illiterate, can't read or write. Do you pay some 5th grader

to

read posts and write that inane GT column? Wouldn't doubt it. If

you

are too busy to research what you call facts then fuck you. Ban me
admin, I don't give a shit. I'm an adult and this is an adult

forum. I

have a right not to be censored. Singer, you dick, I'm gone til you
can make a logical statement and prove it.
John
P.S.- Has anyone seen my Constitutional right to free sprrch??

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>

wrote:

> > If O'Reilly did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind bars
> > right now where he should be if that's the case.
>
> Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is

Robbie

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:
> contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.
>

FACT: The deal likely involved payment of millions of dollars to Mackris,
since the two sides were discussing an offer of well over $2 million when
negotiations broke down, said sources close to O'Reilly. Both parties agreed
to keep the details confidential, according to the statement.

···

-----Original Message-----
From: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FREEvpF…@…com] On
Behalf Of rsing1111
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:12 PM
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: MIS-STATE OF THE UNION

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> If O'Reilly did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind bars
> right now where he should be if that's the case.

Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is Robbie
contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.

Fact: Kennedy KILLED Mary Jo Kopeckne, and his family helped sway law
enforcement to wash it all away. No money was paid to anyone.

Fact: O'Reilly was ACCUSED of SAYING things that were never
substantiated. O'Reilly countersued the accuser. No money is known to
have exchanged hands. For as many people that say O'Reilly paid the
broad off, there's twicew as many who believe she paid HIM off---
whether it be in the form of money or a blow job, doesn't matter.

Whoops little dicky.....sorry to make you eat crow YET AGAIN.

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
.> > > > Fuego's? HA! When it was Tusks it was something special.

Now

> it's
> > > > nothing but another joint inside one of those locals dumps
you
> > > > frequent. It oughta be free given the quality.
> > >
> > > I guess not being someplace makes you an expert. Is that why
you
> > > claim to know so much>
> >
> > I've been to it and was disgusted.
>
> It was pretty bad for awhile. Much improved over the last 6

months.

> Isn't it nice to know that you've been trumped by me ... again.

The only people who go to it now are degenerate locals like you and
Mrs. addict, and they make believe it's the gourmet meal of a
lifetime. Those type dufuses enjoy low-life buffets, greasy spoon
cafes, and quick in-and-out type joints just so they can get their
gambling in with as little interruption as possible.

LMAO. It really gets to you to be shown up again. If you quit trying
to pass on your opinion as fact you wouldn't get into this kind of
predicament. Your idiotic attempts to sound like you know anything at
all about LV is hilarious. Have another drink, dufus.

>
> > > > > I think I'll believe Harry's summary. Did you spend the
> entire
> > > > > evening on your knees with that mesmerized look in you

eyes.

> > > >
> > > > No, but I spent it with my 2-yr.-old granddaughter who was
> > > absolutely mesmerized by the stature of a great president,

and

my
> > wife & son-in-law and daughter all understood my positions that

I

> > sometimes tell them about. They know I know what I'm talking
about,
> > >
> > > ROTFLMAO.
> >
> > Is that the laughing thing you're struggling with explaining?
>
> No struggle. I suspect your granddaughter was "mesmerized" by you
> constantly licking the TV screen.

She can't reach it yet.

ROTFLMAO. Put that drink down and reread my comment. You are such a
dufus. Your stupidity is unmatched.

> > > > and they realize
> > > > that, like most Americans, you have to put trust in the

hands

> of those elected in a democracy. They also know those who

disagree

> > or protest are a bunch of low life losers who criticize for the
> sake of criticizing, and that Teddy Kennedy--GWB's chief rival--

is

a murderer who got away with it because of wealth and power.
> > >
> > > Ted Kennedy is an ELECTED senator. What happened to "put

trust

in
> > the hands of those elected in a democracy"? You can't go one
single
> > > sentence without contradicting yourself. Put the clown mask
back
> > on, please, it is so fitting.
> >
> > And he's also a murderer that got away with it.
>
> Doesn't change the fact you contradicted yourself in the very

next

> sentence. You must really love looking like a moron, you do it so
> often.

I didn't vote for the fat boy so why would you corrupt my input as
having anything whatsoever to do with such a criminal?

Doesn't change the fact you contradicted yourself in the very next
sentence. You do this constantly. You don't even realize it. It's
like your brain is disconnected from your fingers and mouth.

>
> Some would say GWB is a "murderer that got away with it". A

charge

> that might stand up in some courts.

Then let's put $10k on that right now! More facts little dicky?

then

back it up!! I'll even give you the number----ONE court. If even

ONE

court convicts him and sends him away, you win! Otherwise, it's

just

that same 'ol feel-good nonsense you're famous for.

I meant the court of world opinion, dufus. I suspect if a vote were
taken today that GWB would be found guilty in the majority of
countries in the world. I know, you'd just nuke-em if they disagree
with you and your fantasy boy. How's your tongue? Has it recovered
from the SOTU?

>
> > > > On the contrary. In my comments last night I said we should
> just go to the Afghan-Pakistani border and set off a dozen nukes
> that'll kill most or all of the Al-Q leaders.
> > >
> > > Or ... maybe just kill a lot of innocent people, give Muslims
> good reasons to hate America, create a few thousand more OBLs,

and

> give
> > > America a black eye in the rest of the world that would be
> > impossible to remove. Good idea, moron.
> >
> > Typical twisted and cowardly logic. If we don't create millions
of
> > collateral victims while blasting the terrorist leaders into
Allah-land over there, you and I will become THEIR collateral

damage

over here.
>
> Another completely illogical statement. You do this so often and
> don't even realize it. I guess that what happens when you have NO
> facts to back up your childish assertions.

I noticed you stopped cold when it was time to explain your

nonsense.

Everyone can plainly see your ridiculous ideas are childish and
irrational. Nothing else needs to be explained.

I won't push and make you sweat for now. But here's another piece

of

reality for you to stew over. Actially, two.
1) Today God blessed the world by sinking a shithole ferry between
Egypt & Saudi Arabia. 1000 possible Islamist extremists eliminated.
2) Denmark publishes a picture of the Maniacal Muslim Prophet with

a

bomb as a turbin, causing world-wide Muslim protests, violence, and
crazed reactions. Just like with you, the truth sets them off. If

the

LIVING Pope was drawn with his dick in his hand, do you think HIS
followers would react in such moronic proportions? There's a good
reason for you to wake up and realize that the only good Muslim is

a

dead Muslim. You can't just sit back and negotiate with such

animals,

you can't expect to wage wars with every country in which they

hide,

and you can't worry about killing ten thousand of them just to get
one or two fanatical leaders. They represent such a poor,

downtrodden

slice of society that they have nothing to lose by rebelling after

a

leader is destroyed.

Have another drink. It helps portray the real Rob Singer, an abusive
and moronic individual.

>
> > >
> > > > We don't know where they're hidden
> > > > but we know they're there somewhere. Bury them alive or

blow

> them to bits. So what if we kill millions of innocents--simple
> casualties of war, and almost every one of them in that area will
be put out of their misery anyway. The main purpose after the kill?
No remaining Al-Q will mess with our country again. They only
understand and respect
> > > > viscious violence, and they use our coddled, pacifist ways
> > against us while they slowly peel away. One BIG message would
eliminate the threat forever.
> > >
> > > Are you really this naive? It would NOT remove the threat.
> Instead,
> > > it would multiply the threat 100 times over. You really

should

> try
> > > using that wasted space above your neck every now and then.
Have
> > you ever read a history book in your life?
> >
> > Your position is that of most sissified scardy cats in the
country.
>
> No, my position is actually much closer to GWBs' position then

your

> idiotic "nuke em" plan. So, it appears you think GWB is a "scardy
> cat".

Where'd you pull that out of?

So far GWB hasn't nuked anyone.

First, you're position is one of
cowardice. Does the great GWB sound like a back-off coward to you??

The draft dodger has the gall to call someone else a coward. You are
the epitomy of cowardice. You ran when faced with honorably serving
your country. You are the putrid smell at the bottem of that bottle
you are drinking to forget your failures. You can't eliminate the
stench because YOU are the stench.

>
> > You're afraid that your daily visits to degenerate casinos

would

be
> > disrupted, or you might have to hold a gun for a change.

Explain

> > where the 'threat' would come from if we wiped out their

leaders,

>
> The other billion Muslims.

One billion Muslims against a super-power. You need to brush up on
modern warfare.

You need to read a little history and understand the real capabilites
of our armed forces. Do you really think we'd stand up against a
worldwide force against us? Do you think they'd support us after a
pre-emptive nuclear strike? Robbie, the dufus, shows his intelligence
level once again.

>
> > killed millions of their followers, and made the firm statement
> that
> > any further terror attacks would lead to more innocent Islamic
> > destruction in the effort to kill the hiding wussies amongst
them.
> > That's what they understand. Violence. Hit the schools and
mosques
> > where the terrorists hide like yellow cowards. No conscience---
just
> > like them!
>
> We already know you have no conscience.

So you agree that's the ONLY way to deal with these barbarians.

Good.

You have a conscience, you lose.

Nope. I do know an alcoholic, brain-addled moron could never
understand what needs to be done.

Otherwise you'd have quit
> abusing your family long ago. No one is suprised that you'd take
the
> same approach to the rest of the world. Unfortunately, the world
> would be unliveable after your solution ... or maybe you think
> nuclear winter would be an improvement?

In a one-sided event like this, who cares what happens 'over

there'?

LMAO. There is no "over there" when it comes to massive nuclear
attacks. You are beyond help.

Saving this country is the only thing that matters. Maybe you're OK
with losing Cleveland or SF or NYC, as a method of making peace

with

these losers. With you in charge that's just what would happen--
they'd have the time and the resources to go ahead with it. BOOM!

With your approach we lose them all and the rest of the country. have
another drink and try again tomorrow.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

I don't doubt that O'Reilly is the one who paid because he's the one
who was working and the one who has the millions. But that doesn't
mean he was guilty of anything at all--only that it was in his best
interest career-wise to get rid of the thing. I wouldn't be surprised
if FOX paid the girl off for him. There's gold-diggers everywhere,
and the most opportunistic are the ones who are first to take
advantage of anything. Just like with Michael Jackson. He SEEMS
guilty to the rest of us, but the jury that was there ALL THE TIME
said he wasn't. We gonna trust a grump like John here or the jury to
be right? The civil cases after the criminal hearings are something I
don't understand. OJ/MJ are PROVEN innocent beyond a shadow of a
doubt unanimously in painstaking hearings, then people are allowed to
take a second, less qualifying shot at them for monetary purposes.
What's the point? Why then not give them a THIRD crack at it, where
if there's a 50-50 or greater jury vote, the 'victim's' family could
throw pies at the defendant.

FACT: The deal likely involved payment of millions of dollars to

Mackris,

since the two sides were discussing an offer of well over $2

million when

negotiations broke down, said sources close to O'Reilly. Both

parties agreed

to keep the details confidential, according to the statement.

From: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com

[mailto:FREEvpF…@…com] On

Behalf Of rsing1111
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:12 PM
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: MIS-STATE OF THE UNION

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>

wrote:

> > If O'Reilly did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind bars
> > right now where he should be if that's the case.
>
> Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is

Robbie

> contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.

Fact: Kennedy KILLED Mary Jo Kopeckne, and his family helped sway

law

enforcement to wash it all away. No money was paid to anyone.

Fact: O'Reilly was ACCUSED of SAYING things that were never
substantiated. O'Reilly countersued the accuser. No money is known

to

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Webb" <vpbob1@...> wrote:

-----Original Message-----
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:
have exchanged hands. For as many people that say O'Reilly paid the
broad off, there's twicew as many who believe she paid HIM off---
whether it be in the form of money or a blow job, doesn't matter.

Whoops little dicky.....sorry to make you eat crow YET AGAIN.

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>

wrote:

> > If O'Reilly did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind bars
> > right now where he should be if that's the case.
>
> Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is

Robbie

> contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.

Fact: Kennedy KILLED Mary Jo Kopeckne, and his family helped sway

law

enforcement to wash it all away. No money was paid to anyone.

"If (O'Reilly/Kennedy) did something wrong as you say, he'd be behind
bars right now where he should be if that's the case." Your own words
moron.

Fact: O'Reilly was ACCUSED of SAYING things that were never
substantiated. O'Reilly countersued the accuser. No money is known

to

have exchanged hands. For as many people that say O'Reilly paid the
broad off, there's twicew as many who believe she paid HIM off---
whether it be in the form of money or a blow job, doesn't matter.

Whoops little dicky.....sorry to make you eat crow YET AGAIN.

LMAO. You must really work overtime to look STUPID. I never stated
anything about O'Reilly. Are you answering your own posts now? I hope
that crow tastes good, dufus. You have several more courses coming up.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

> > It was pretty bad for awhile. Much improved over the last 6
months.
> > Isn't it nice to know that you've been trumped by me ... again.
>
> The only people who go to it now are degenerate locals like you

and

> Mrs. addict, and they make believe it's the gourmet meal of a
> lifetime. Those type dufuses enjoy low-life buffets, greasy spoon
> cafes, and quick in-and-out type joints just so they can get

their gambling in with as little interruption as possible.

LMAO. It really gets to you to be shown up again. If you quit

trying

to pass on your opinion as fact you wouldn't get into this kind of
predicament. Your idiotic attempts to sound like you know anything

at all about LV is hilarious. Have another drink, dufus.

What got to you this time----the "degenerate locals" part? No wonder
your upset. The truth again. If I left it up to you, you'd
marginalize the gourmet restaurants all over the Strip
as "overpriced" and "you're paying for the name" because you can't
afford to go to them---which you really could if you didn't lose all
your money in the cheap joints. I'm betting the acid's really flowing
in that oversized belly right about now!

> > >
> > > Is that the laughing thing you're struggling with explaining?
> >
> > No struggle. I suspect your granddaughter was "mesmerized" by

you

> > constantly licking the TV screen.
>
> She can't reach it yet.

ROTFLMAO. Put that drink down and reread my comment. You are such a
dufus. Your stupidity is unmatched.

If you learned sentence structure in school (oh, that's
right....nerds only cared about statistics, drafting, trigonometry
and Latin) you'd figure it out without me giving you thses hints.

> I didn't vote for the fat boy so why would you corrupt my input

as having anything whatsoever to do with such a criminal?

Doesn't change the fact you contradicted yourself in the very next
sentence. You do this constantly. You don't even realize it. It's
like your brain is disconnected from your fingers and mouth.

If you even read your own writing you'd see you're contracdicting
both you AND me in the same sentences. I'll bet you wake up each
morning with a criticizm of your wife rolling out of your mouth. Just
like get with your plethora of mistakes here, I can hear a loud SLAP
in the distance. But all is forgiven moments later after you announce
which casino you're taking her to today. Addicts will be addicts!

> > Some would say GWB is a "murderer that got away with it". A
charge that might stand up in some courts.
>
> Then let's put $10k on that right now! More facts little dicky?
then
> back it up!! I'll even give you the number----ONE court. If even
ONE
> court convicts him and sends him away, you win! Otherwise, it's
just
> that same 'ol feel-good nonsense you're famous for.

I meant the court of world opinion, dufus.

Ahumma ahumma ahumma ahumma..... Figure it out first, banana head.

I suspect if a vote were

taken today that GWB would be found guilty in the majority of
countries in the world.

Gets your facts straight, bozo. What's up here----voting or
hearings?? You'd suspect just about anything with an approach like
that.

I know, you'd just nuke-em if they disagree

with you and your fantasy boy. How's your tongue? Has it recovered
from the SOTU?

I love it when you show your frustration with a president that stuffs
it back into the faces of the liberals every time they try to one-up
him. He makes them...and therefore you...look sooo bad it's almost
embarrassing for me to have to sit thru it all.

> > > > > On the contrary. In my comments last night I said we

should

> > just go to the Afghan-Pakistani border and set off a dozen

nukes

> > that'll kill most or all of the Al-Q leaders.
> > > >
> > > > Or ... maybe just kill a lot of innocent people, give

Muslims

> > good reasons to hate America, create a few thousand more OBLs,
and
> > give
> > > > America a black eye in the rest of the world that would be
> > > impossible to remove. Good idea, moron.
> > >
> > > Typical twisted and cowardly logic. If we don't create

millions

> of
> > > collateral victims while blasting the terrorist leaders into
> Allah-land over there, you and I will become THEIR collateral
damage
> over here.
> >
> > Another completely illogical statement. You do this so often

and

> > don't even realize it. I guess that what happens when you have

NO

> > facts to back up your childish assertions.
>
> I noticed you stopped cold when it was time to explain your
nonsense.

Everyone can plainly see your ridiculous ideas are childish and
irrational. Nothing else needs to be explained.

Translation: you agree with me but don't want to say it here. That's
alright little dicky. You don't have to worry when you can't give
explanations or examples. Everyone understands..... I'll always be
there to help you out.

> I won't push and make you sweat for now. But here's another piece
of
> reality for you to stew over. Actially, two.
> 1) Today God blessed the world by sinking a shithole ferry

between

> Egypt & Saudi Arabia. 1000 possible Islamist extremists

eliminated.

> 2) Denmark publishes a picture of the Maniacal Muslim Prophet

with

a
> bomb as a turbin, causing world-wide Muslim protests, violence,

and

> crazed reactions. Just like with you, the truth sets them off. If
the
> LIVING Pope was drawn with his dick in his hand, do you think HIS
> followers would react in such moronic proportions? There's a good
> reason for you to wake up and realize that the only good Muslim

is

a
> dead Muslim. You can't just sit back and negotiate with such
animals, you can't expect to wage wars with every country in which

they hide, and you can't worry about killing ten thousand of them
just to get one or two fanatical leaders. They represent such a poor,

downtrodden slice of society that they have nothing to lose by

rebelling after a leader is destroyed.

Have another drink. It helps portray the real Rob Singer, an

abusive and moronic individual.

Tell me I didn't expect that from one who hasn't a grasp on the world
situation..... You make me look better every passing moment, and I
don't even NEED your support!

> > > > > We don't know where they're hidden
> > > > > but we know they're there somewhere. Bury them alive or
blow
> > them to bits. So what if we kill millions of innocents--simple
> > casualties of war, and almost every one of them in that area

will be put out of their misery anyway. The main purpose after the
kill? No remaining Al-Q will mess with our country again. They only

> understand and respect
> > > > > viscious violence, and they use our coddled, pacifist

ways

> > > against us while they slowly peel away. One BIG message would
> eliminate the threat forever.
> > > >
> > > > Are you really this naive? It would NOT remove the threat.
> > Instead,
> > > > it would multiply the threat 100 times over. You really
should
> > try
> > > > using that wasted space above your neck every now and then.
> Have
> > > you ever read a history book in your life?
> > >
> > > Your position is that of most sissified scardy cats in the
> country.
> >
> > No, my position is actually much closer to GWBs' position then
your
> > idiotic "nuke em" plan. So, it appears you think GWB is

a "scardy

> > cat".
>
> Where'd you pull that out of?

So far GWB hasn't nuked anyone.

Duh! Give me a few days to check that statement out.

> First, you're position is one of
> cowardice. Does the great GWB sound like a back-off coward to

you??

The draft dodger has the gall to call someone else a coward. You

are

the epitomy of cowardice. You ran when faced with honorably serving
your country.

HELLO! I wasn't involved in the hippie draft! It was a method of
weeding out the do-nothings and the low lifes anyway. Instead and
unlike you--who hide in the bowels of corporate America after a short
stint smoking dope in the military--I served the US Gov't. for TEN
years.

You are the putrid smell at the bottem of that bottle

you are drinking to forget your failures. You can't eliminate the
stench because YOU are the stench.

As a matter of fact, I'm on my 2nd Jack Daniels Single Barrel right
now! Premium pour. No stench. You'd know that if you didn't spend so
much time in those dumps you take your addict wife to. But who knows.
Maybe that's all she's worth. I mean, pathological gamblers are a
dime a dozen in that scumbag town.

  
> > > You're afraid that your daily visits to degenerate casinos
would
> be
> > > disrupted, or you might have to hold a gun for a change.
Explain
> > > where the 'threat' would come from if we wiped out their
leaders,
> >
> > The other billion Muslims.
>
> One billion Muslims against a super-power. You need to brush up

on

> modern warfare.

You need to read a little history and understand the real

capabilites

of our armed forces. Do you really think we'd stand up against a
worldwide force against us? Do you think they'd support us after a
pre-emptive nuclear strike? Robbie, the dufus, shows his

intelligence level once again.

Tell me, are you afraid of your own shadow too? And I'm surprised at
how really really stupid you are when it comes to reality. Or even
your famous fallback--'theory'--in this case. Think of the countries
where the Muslim scum hang out. How many have nukes, and how many can
deliver them this far? Then take a guess at how many are closeby an
ocean or large waterway. Then look up how many LA class subs we've
got prowling the seas and how many multi-warhead tipped nuclear
missiles are on them and what kind of destruction they can dish out.
Then figure out what aircraft carry similar weaponry (I know, an
unlearned geek like you would have to reference Jane's to get
anything right). And when you're all done getting spoon-fed the facts
think about which FIRST WORLD countries wouldn't take our side after
pre-emptive strikes. Talk is one thing (the French & Germans) but you
think they'll try to attack us after that? See, I TOLD you you should
have gotten out more when you had the chance.

> > We already know you have no conscience.
>
> So you agree that's the ONLY way to deal with these barbarians.
Good. You have a conscience, you lose.

Nope. I do know an alcoholic, brain-addled moron could never
understand what needs to be done.

???

>
> Otherwise you'd have quit
> > abusing your family long ago. No one is suprised that you'd

take

> the
> > same approach to the rest of the world. Unfortunately, the

world

> > would be unliveable after your solution ... or maybe you think
> > nuclear winter would be an improvement?
>
> In a one-sided event like this, who cares what happens 'over
there'?

LMAO. There is no "over there" when it comes to massive nuclear
attacks. You are beyond help.

You are sooo naiive. Just like the nerds from years ago. An old man
still stuck in the past.

> Saving this country is the only thing that matters. Maybe you're

OK

> with losing Cleveland or SF or NYC, as a method of making peace
with
> these losers. With you in charge that's just what would happen--
> they'd have the time and the resources to go ahead with it. BOOM!

With your approach we lose them all and the rest of the country.

have another drink and try again tomorrow.

Admit it. All you care about is losing the video poker machines and
nothing else. But then again, you really have nothing else to live
for.>

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> > Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is
Robbie
> > contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.
>
> Fact: Kennedy KILLED Mary Jo Kopeckne, and his family helped sway
law
> enforcement to wash it all away. No money was paid to anyone.

"If (O'Reilly/Kennedy) did something wrong as you say, he'd be

behind

bars right now where he should be if that's the case." Your own

words moron.

You're confused as usual---or maybe you NEED to act confused so you
don't look so stupid. "IF O'Reilly did something wrong" were the
words--be a good geek and look it up this time.

> Fact: O'Reilly was ACCUSED of SAYING things that were never
> substantiated. O'Reilly countersued the accuser. No money is

known to have exchanged hands. For as many people that say O'Reilly
paid the broad off, there's twicew as many who believe she paid HIM
off---whether it be in the form of money or a blow job, doesn't
matter.

>
> Whoops little dicky.....sorry to make you eat crow YET AGAIN.

LMAO. You must really work overtime to look STUPID. I never stated
anything about O'Reilly. Are you answering your own posts now? I

hope that crow tastes good, dufus. You have several more courses
coming up.

Whooooosh! Striaght over your head!! AGAIN!!!! Are you THAT dumb? I'd
cut and paste your original comment(response) that was posted in
response to multiple words of wisdom by your pal, but I know you'll
do it and try to make all this go away anyway. I've served you enough
crow in the past so I'll let up some here just for you little
dicky....just for you!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> > > It was pretty bad for awhile. Much improved over the last 6
> months.
> > > Isn't it nice to know that you've been trumped by me ...

again.

> >
> > The only people who go to it now are degenerate locals like you
and
> > Mrs. addict, and they make believe it's the gourmet meal of a
> > lifetime. Those type dufuses enjoy low-life buffets, greasy

spoon

> > cafes, and quick in-and-out type joints just so they can get
their gambling in with as little interruption as possible.
>
> LMAO. It really gets to you to be shown up again. If you quit
trying
> to pass on your opinion as fact you wouldn't get into this kind

of

> predicament. Your idiotic attempts to sound like you know

anything

at all about LV is hilarious. Have another drink, dufus.

What got to you this time----the "degenerate locals" part? No

wonder

your upset. The truth again.

Let me know the first time you and the truth get together. It would a
first.

If I left it up to you, you'd
marginalize the gourmet restaurants all over the Strip
as "overpriced" and "you're paying for the name" because you can't
afford to go to them---which you really could if you didn't lose

all

your money in the cheap joints. I'm betting the acid's really

flowing

in that oversized belly right about now!

If it's so oversized why are you scared silly to play me in tennis?
Your the biggest coward I've ever encountered. No, go change your
diaper. I know it gets wet every time I mention tennis.

>
> > > >
> > > > Is that the laughing thing you're struggling with

explaining?

> > >
> > > No struggle. I suspect your granddaughter was "mesmerized" by
you
> > > constantly licking the TV screen.
> >
> > She can't reach it yet.
>
> ROTFLMAO. Put that drink down and reread my comment. You are such

a

> dufus. Your stupidity is unmatched.

If you learned sentence structure in school (oh, that's
right....nerds only cared about statistics, drafting, trigonometry
and Latin) you'd figure it out without me giving you thses hints.

Too late. ROTFLMAO. Now, put down that drink and go to bed, your wife
will be home soon and she'd prefer you were sleeping.

>
> > I didn't vote for the fat boy so why would you corrupt my input
as having anything whatsoever to do with such a criminal?
>
> Doesn't change the fact you contradicted yourself in the very

next

> sentence. You do this constantly. You don't even realize it. It's
> like your brain is disconnected from your fingers and mouth.

If you even read your own writing you'd see you're contracdicting
both you AND me in the same sentences.

Too late, moron. We all can see you're so drunk you don't even know
what you're doing. This is great.

I'll bet you wake up each
morning with a criticizm of your wife rolling out of your mouth.

Just

like get with your plethora of mistakes here, I can hear a loud

SLAP

in the distance. But all is forgiven moments later after you

announce

which casino you're taking her to today. Addicts will be addicts!

Have another drink, dufus. Maybe then you could come up with an
original line. What? You don't understand what the word "original"
means? I didn't think so.

> > > Some would say GWB is a "murderer that got away with it". A
> charge that might stand up in some courts.
> >
> > Then let's put $10k on that right now! More facts little dicky?
> then
> > back it up!! I'll even give you the number----ONE court. If

even

> ONE
> > court convicts him and sends him away, you win! Otherwise, it's
> just
> > that same 'ol feel-good nonsense you're famous for.
>
> I meant the court of world opinion, dufus.

Ahumma ahumma ahumma ahumma..... Figure it out first, banana head.

I have it all figured out dufus, only you don't like the fact that I
am right one more time.

I suspect if a vote were
> taken today that GWB would be found guilty in the majority of
> countries in the world.

Gets your facts straight, bozo. What's up here----voting or
hearings?? You'd suspect just about anything with an approach like
that.

The facts are simple. The vast majority of people in the WORLD
believe GWB is a criminal and would find him guilty. Now, put down
that drink, give your 8x10 glossy of GWB a big hug and go to bed.

I know, you'd just nuke-em if they disagree
> with you and your fantasy boy. How's your tongue? Has it

recovered

> from the SOTU?

I love it when you show your frustration with a president that

stuffs

it back into the faces of the liberals every time they try to one-

up

him. He makes them...and therefore you...look sooo bad it's almost
embarrassing for me to have to sit thru it all.

LMAO. The tougue must still be a little sore.

>
> > > > > > On the contrary. In my comments last night I said we
should
> > > just go to the Afghan-Pakistani border and set off a dozen
nukes
> > > that'll kill most or all of the Al-Q leaders.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or ... maybe just kill a lot of innocent people, give
Muslims
> > > good reasons to hate America, create a few thousand more

OBLs,

> and
> > > give
> > > > > America a black eye in the rest of the world that would

be

> > > > impossible to remove. Good idea, moron.
> > > >
> > > > Typical twisted and cowardly logic. If we don't create
millions
> > of
> > > > collateral victims while blasting the terrorist leaders

into

> > Allah-land over there, you and I will become THEIR collateral
> damage
> > over here.
> > >
> > > Another completely illogical statement. You do this so often
and
> > > don't even realize it. I guess that what happens when you

have

NO
> > > facts to back up your childish assertions.
> >
> > I noticed you stopped cold when it was time to explain your
> nonsense.
>
> Everyone can plainly see your ridiculous ideas are childish and
> irrational. Nothing else needs to be explained.

Translation: you agree with me but don't want to say it here.

No, that must be the liquor fogging your already diminished thinking.

> > I won't push and make you sweat for now. But here's another

piece

> of
> > reality for you to stew over. Actially, two.
> > 1) Today God blessed the world by sinking a shithole ferry
between
> > Egypt & Saudi Arabia. 1000 possible Islamist extremists
eliminated.
> > 2) Denmark publishes a picture of the Maniacal Muslim Prophet
with
> a
> > bomb as a turbin, causing world-wide Muslim protests, violence,
and
> > crazed reactions. Just like with you, the truth sets them off.

If

> the
> > LIVING Pope was drawn with his dick in his hand, do you think

HIS

> > followers would react in such moronic proportions? There's a

good

> > reason for you to wake up and realize that the only good Muslim
is
> a
> > dead Muslim. You can't just sit back and negotiate with such
> animals, you can't expect to wage wars with every country in

which

they hide, and you can't worry about killing ten thousand of them
just to get one or two fanatical leaders. They represent such a

poor,

> downtrodden slice of society that they have nothing to lose by
rebelling after a leader is destroyed.
>
> Have another drink. It helps portray the real Rob Singer, an
abusive and moronic individual.

Tell me I didn't expect that from one who hasn't a grasp on the

world

situation..... You make me look better every passing moment, and I
don't even NEED your support!

No, you need professional help. Please, tell us again how a massive
nuclear war will solve all the problems of the world.

>
> > > > > > We don't know where they're hidden
> > > > > > but we know they're there somewhere. Bury them alive or
> blow
> > > them to bits. So what if we kill millions of innocents--

simple

> > > casualties of war, and almost every one of them in that area
will be put out of their misery anyway. The main purpose after the
kill? No remaining Al-Q will mess with our country again. They only
> > understand and respect
> > > > > > viscious violence, and they use our coddled, pacifist
ways
> > > > against us while they slowly peel away. One BIG message

would

> > eliminate the threat forever.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you really this naive? It would NOT remove the

threat.

> > > Instead,
> > > > > it would multiply the threat 100 times over. You really
> should
> > > try
> > > > > using that wasted space above your neck every now and

then.

> > Have
> > > > you ever read a history book in your life?
> > > >
> > > > Your position is that of most sissified scardy cats in the
> > country.
> > >
> > > No, my position is actually much closer to GWBs' position

then

> your
> > > idiotic "nuke em" plan. So, it appears you think GWB is
a "scardy
> > > cat".
> >
> > Where'd you pull that out of?
>
> So far GWB hasn't nuked anyone.

Duh! Give me a few days to check that statement out.

I'll give you all the time you need. For most people that's about a
nanosecond, for you it may takes several years.

>
> > First, you're position is one of
> > cowardice. Does the great GWB sound like a back-off coward to
you??
>
> The draft dodger has the gall to call someone else a coward. You
are
> the epitomy of cowardice. You ran when faced with honorably

serving

> your country.

HELLO! I wasn't involved in the hippie draft!

Coward.

It was a method of
weeding out the do-nothings and the low lifes anyway. Instead and
unlike you--who hide in the bowels of corporate America after a

short

stint smoking dope in the military--I served the US Gov't. for TEN
years.

Coward.

You are the putrid smell at the bottem of that bottle
> you are drinking to forget your failures. You can't eliminate the
> stench because YOU are the stench.

As a matter of fact, I'm on my 2nd Jack Daniels Single Barrel right
now!

Was there ever a doubt?

Premium pour. No stench.

In your hands, plenty of stench.

You'd know that if you didn't spend so
much time in those dumps you take your addict wife to. But who

knows.

Maybe that's all she's worth. I mean, pathological gamblers are a
dime a dozen in that scumbag town.

We're still waiting for that original thought, dufus.

>
> > > > You're afraid that your daily visits to degenerate casinos
> would
> > be
> > > > disrupted, or you might have to hold a gun for a change.
> Explain
> > > > where the 'threat' would come from if we wiped out their
> leaders,
> > >
> > > The other billion Muslims.
> >
> > One billion Muslims against a super-power. You need to brush up
on
> > modern warfare.
>
> You need to read a little history and understand the real
capabilites
> of our armed forces. Do you really think we'd stand up against a
> worldwide force against us? Do you think they'd support us after

a

> pre-emptive nuclear strike? Robbie, the dufus, shows his
intelligence level once again.

Tell me, are you afraid of your own shadow too?

I served my country while you ran and hid in a sewer of a country.
The stench is still part of you and will always be part of you. I
wonder who everyone believes is afraid of their shadow? Yes, dufus,
it's you.

And I'm surprised at
how really really stupid you are when it comes to reality. Or even
your famous fallback--'theory'--in this case. Think of the

countries

where the Muslim scum hang out. How many have nukes, and how many

can

deliver them this far? Then take a guess at how many are closeby an
ocean or large waterway. Then look up how many LA class subs we've
got prowling the seas and how many multi-warhead tipped nuclear
missiles are on them and what kind of destruction they can dish

out.

Then figure out what aircraft carry similar weaponry (I know, an
unlearned geek like you would have to reference Jane's to get
anything right). And when you're all done getting spoon-fed the

facts

think about which FIRST WORLD countries wouldn't take our side

after

pre-emptive strikes. Talk is one thing (the French & Germans) but

you

think they'll try to attack us after that? See, I TOLD you you

should

have gotten out more when you had the chance.

Please, tell us again how a massive nuclear war will solve all the
problems of the world. While your at it, moron, do you really believe
that Russia and China would standby while we destroy humanity?

>
> > > We already know you have no conscience.
> >
> > So you agree that's the ONLY way to deal with these barbarians.
> Good. You have a conscience, you lose.
>
> Nope. I do know an alcoholic, brain-addled moron could never
> understand what needs to be done.

???

Finally, the sum of all your intelligence.

>
> >
> > Otherwise you'd have quit
> > > abusing your family long ago. No one is suprised that you'd
take
> > the
> > > same approach to the rest of the world. Unfortunately, the
world
> > > would be unliveable after your solution ... or maybe you

think

> > > nuclear winter would be an improvement?
> >
> > In a one-sided event like this, who cares what happens 'over
> there'?
>
> LMAO. There is no "over there" when it comes to massive nuclear
> attacks. You are beyond help.

You are sooo naiive. Just like the nerds from years ago. An old man
still stuck in the past.

Please, tell us again how a massive nuclear war will solve all the
problems of the world. Do the voices tell you this? How long have you
been hearing these voices? We already know you haven't had an
original though in several decades.

>
> > Saving this country is the only thing that matters. Maybe

you're

OK
> > with losing Cleveland or SF or NYC, as a method of making peace
> with
> > these losers. With you in charge that's just what would happen--
> > they'd have the time and the resources to go ahead with it.

BOOM!

>
> With your approach we lose them all and the rest of the country.
have another drink and try again tomorrow.

Admit it. All you care about is losing the video poker machines and
nothing else. But then again, you really have nothing else to live
for.

Here's the drunken draft dodger looking in the mirror again. You
don't even have the balls to respond on this forum without a couple
of drinks so I know you'll never face me on the tennis court.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

> > > > It was pretty bad for awhile. Much improved over the last 6
> > months.
> > > > Isn't it nice to know that you've been trumped by me ...
again.
> > >
> > > The only people who go to it now are degenerate locals like

you

> and
> > > Mrs. addict, and they make believe it's the gourmet meal of a
> > > lifetime. Those type dufuses enjoy low-life buffets, greasy
spoon
> > > cafes, and quick in-and-out type joints just so they can get
> their gambling in with as little interruption as possible.
> >
> > LMAO. It really gets to you to be shown up again. If you quit
> trying
> > to pass on your opinion as fact you wouldn't get into this kind
of
> > predicament. Your idiotic attempts to sound like you know
anything
> at all about LV is hilarious. Have another drink, dufus.
>
> What got to you this time----the "degenerate locals" part? No
wonder
> your upset. The truth again.

Let me know the first time you and the truth get together. It would

a first.

Impossible to get anything through to anyone who stays out all night
playing video poker. The mind becomes mush after 2 hours. That
explains why you're all over the map.

> If I left it up to you, you'd
> marginalize the gourmet restaurants all over the Strip
> as "overpriced" and "you're paying for the name" because you

can't

> afford to go to them---which you really could if you didn't lose
all
> your money in the cheap joints. I'm betting the acid's really
flowing
> in that oversized belly right about now!

If it's so oversized why are you scared silly to play me in tennis?
Your the biggest coward I've ever encountered. No, go change your
diaper. I know it gets wet every time I mention tennis.

I guess you're feeling pretty silly right about now little dicky!

> >
> > > > >
> > > > > Is that the laughing thing you're struggling with
explaining?
> > > >
> > > > No struggle. I suspect your granddaughter was "mesmerized"

by

> you
> > > > constantly licking the TV screen.
> > >
> > > She can't reach it yet.
> >
> > ROTFLMAO. Put that drink down and reread my comment. You are

such

a
> > dufus. Your stupidity is unmatched.
>
> If you learned sentence structure in school (oh, that's
> right....nerds only cared about statistics, drafting,

trigonometry

> and Latin) you'd figure it out without me giving you thses hints.

Too late. ROTFLMAO. Now, put down that drink and go to bed, your

wife will be home soon and she'd prefer you were sleeping.

I know. You're trying to impress that dufus who said he liked your
letters instead of responses! I'm so good it really hurts now!

> > > I didn't vote for the fat boy so why would you corrupt my

input

> as having anything whatsoever to do with such a criminal?
> >
> > Doesn't change the fact you contradicted yourself in the very
next
> > sentence. You do this constantly. You don't even realize it.

It's

> > like your brain is disconnected from your fingers and mouth.
>
> If you even read your own writing you'd see you're contracdicting
> both you AND me in the same sentences.

Too late, moron. We all can see you're so drunk you don't even know
what you're doing. This is great.

I'm wondering if you played 6 hours or 10 from the looks of things
here.

> I'll bet you wake up each
> morning with a criticizm of your wife rolling out of your mouth.
Just
> like get with your plethora of mistakes here, I can hear a loud
SLAP
> in the distance. But all is forgiven moments later after you
announce
> which casino you're taking her to today. Addicts will be addicts!

Have another drink, dufus. Maybe then you could come up with an
original line. What? You don't understand what the word "original"
means? I didn't think so.

YUP! 10.
  

> > > > Some would say GWB is a "murderer that got away with it". A
> > charge that might stand up in some courts.
> > >
> > > Then let's put $10k on that right now! More facts little

dicky?

> > then
> > > back it up!! I'll even give you the number----ONE court. If
even
> > ONE
> > > court convicts him and sends him away, you win! Otherwise,

it's

> > just
> > > that same 'ol feel-good nonsense you're famous for.
> >
> > I meant the court of world opinion, dufus.
>
> Ahumma ahumma ahumma ahumma..... Figure it out first, banana head.

I have it all figured out dufus, only you don't like the fact that

I am right one more time.

YUP! 10 it is!

> I suspect if a vote were
> > taken today that GWB would be found guilty in the majority of
> > countries in the world.
>
> Gets your facts straight, bozo. What's up here----voting or
> hearings?? You'd suspect just about anything with an approach

like

> that.

The facts are simple. The vast majority of people in the WORLD
believe GWB is a criminal and would find him guilty. Now, put down
that drink, give your 8x10 glossy of GWB a big hug and go to bed.

More quoting from that 'fact sheet'? Oh please stop it now---I can't
stop buckling over in giggles!!

> I know, you'd just nuke-em if they disagree
> > with you and your fantasy boy. How's your tongue? Has it
recovered
> > from the SOTU?
>
> I love it when you show your frustration with a president that
stuffs
> it back into the faces of the liberals every time they try to one-
up
> him. He makes them...and therefore you...look sooo bad it's

almost

> embarrassing for me to have to sit thru it all.

LMAO. The tougue must still be a little sore.

> >
> > > > > > > On the contrary. In my comments last night I said we
> should
> > > > just go to the Afghan-Pakistani border and set off a dozen
> nukes
> > > > that'll kill most or all of the Al-Q leaders.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or ... maybe just kill a lot of innocent people, give
> Muslims
> > > > good reasons to hate America, create a few thousand more
OBLs,
> > and
> > > > give
> > > > > > America a black eye in the rest of the world that would
be
> > > > > impossible to remove. Good idea, moron.
> > > > >
> > > > > Typical twisted and cowardly logic. If we don't create
> millions
> > > of
> > > > > collateral victims while blasting the terrorist leaders
into
> > > Allah-land over there, you and I will become THEIR collateral
> > damage
> > > over here.
> > > >
> > > > Another completely illogical statement. You do this so

often

> and
> > > > don't even realize it. I guess that what happens when you
have
> NO
> > > > facts to back up your childish assertions.
> > >
> > > I noticed you stopped cold when it was time to explain your
> > nonsense.
> >
> > Everyone can plainly see your ridiculous ideas are childish and
> > irrational. Nothing else needs to be explained.
>
> Translation: you agree with me but don't want to say it here.

No, that must be the liquor fogging your already diminished

thinking.

> > > I won't push and make you sweat for now. But here's another
piece
> > of
> > > reality for you to stew over. Actially, two.
> > > 1) Today God blessed the world by sinking a shithole ferry
> between
> > > Egypt & Saudi Arabia. 1000 possible Islamist extremists
> eliminated.
> > > 2) Denmark publishes a picture of the Maniacal Muslim Prophet
> with
> > a
> > > bomb as a turbin, causing world-wide Muslim protests,

violence,

> and
> > > crazed reactions. Just like with you, the truth sets them

off.

If
> > the
> > > LIVING Pope was drawn with his dick in his hand, do you think
HIS
> > > followers would react in such moronic proportions? There's a
good
> > > reason for you to wake up and realize that the only good

Muslim

> is
> > a
> > > dead Muslim. You can't just sit back and negotiate with such
> > animals, you can't expect to wage wars with every country in
which
> they hide, and you can't worry about killing ten thousand of them
> just to get one or two fanatical leaders. They represent such a
poor,
> > downtrodden slice of society that they have nothing to lose by
> rebelling after a leader is destroyed.
> >
> > Have another drink. It helps portray the real Rob Singer, an
> abusive and moronic individual.
>
> Tell me I didn't expect that from one who hasn't a grasp on the
world
> situation..... You make me look better every passing moment, and

I

> don't even NEED your support!

No, you need professional help. Please, tell us again how a massive
nuclear war will solve all the problems of the world.

Oops--you need more help. MASSIVE nuclear war? With whom?

> >
> > > > > > > We don't know where they're hidden
> > > > > > > but we know they're there somewhere. Bury them alive

or

> > blow
> > > > them to bits. So what if we kill millions of innocents--
simple
> > > > casualties of war, and almost every one of them in that

area

> will be put out of their misery anyway. The main purpose after

the

> kill? No remaining Al-Q will mess with our country again. They

only

> > > understand and respect
> > > > > > > viscious violence, and they use our coddled, pacifist
> ways
> > > > > against us while they slowly peel away. One BIG message
would
> > > eliminate the threat forever.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you really this naive? It would NOT remove the
threat.
> > > > Instead,
> > > > > > it would multiply the threat 100 times over. You really
> > should
> > > > try
> > > > > > using that wasted space above your neck every now and
then.
> > > Have
> > > > > you ever read a history book in your life?
> > > > >
> > > > > Your position is that of most sissified scardy cats in

the

> > > country.
> > > >
> > > > No, my position is actually much closer to GWBs' position
then
> > your
> > > > idiotic "nuke em" plan. So, it appears you think GWB is
> a "scardy
> > > > cat".
> > >
> > > Where'd you pull that out of?
> >
> > So far GWB hasn't nuked anyone.
>
> Duh! Give me a few days to check that statement out.

I'll give you all the time you need. For most people that's about a
nanosecond, for you it may takes several years.

> >
> > > First, you're position is one of
> > > cowardice. Does the great GWB sound like a back-off coward to
> you??
> >
> > The draft dodger has the gall to call someone else a coward.

You

> are
> > the epitomy of cowardice. You ran when faced with honorably
serving
> > your country.
>
> HELLO! I wasn't involved in the hippie draft!

Coward.

> It was a method of
> weeding out the do-nothings and the low lifes anyway. Instead and
> unlike you--who hide in the bowels of corporate America after a
short
> stint smoking dope in the military--I served the US Gov't. for

TEN

> years.

Coward.

>
> You are the putrid smell at the bottem of that bottle
> > you are drinking to forget your failures. You can't eliminate

the

> > stench because YOU are the stench.
>
> As a matter of fact, I'm on my 2nd Jack Daniels Single Barrel

right

> now!

Was there ever a doubt?

> Premium pour. No stench.

In your hands, plenty of stench.

> You'd know that if you didn't spend so
> much time in those dumps you take your addict wife to. But who
knows.
> Maybe that's all she's worth. I mean, pathological gamblers are a
> dime a dozen in that scumbag town.

We're still waiting for that original thought, dufus.

That I can tell. After all, who DOESN'T know about your tasteless
family.....

> >
> > > > > You're afraid that your daily visits to degenerate

casinos

> > would
> > > be
> > > > > disrupted, or you might have to hold a gun for a change.
> > Explain
> > > > > where the 'threat' would come from if we wiped out their
> > leaders,
> > > >
> > > > The other billion Muslims.
> > >
> > > One billion Muslims against a super-power. You need to brush

up

> on
> > > modern warfare.
> >
> > You need to read a little history and understand the real
> capabilites
> > of our armed forces. Do you really think we'd stand up against

a

> > worldwide force against us? Do you think they'd support us

after

a
> > pre-emptive nuclear strike? Robbie, the dufus, shows his
> intelligence level once again.
>
> Tell me, are you afraid of your own shadow too?

I served my country while you ran and hid in a sewer of a country.
The stench is still part of you and will always be part of you. I
wonder who everyone believes is afraid of their shadow? Yes, dufus,
it's you.

> And I'm surprised at
> how really really stupid you are when it comes to reality. Or

even

> your famous fallback--'theory'--in this case. Think of the
countries
> where the Muslim scum hang out. How many have nukes, and how many
can
> deliver them this far? Then take a guess at how many are closeby

an

> ocean or large waterway. Then look up how many LA class subs

we've

> got prowling the seas and how many multi-warhead tipped nuclear
> missiles are on them and what kind of destruction they can dish
out.
> Then figure out what aircraft carry similar weaponry (I know, an
> unlearned geek like you would have to reference Jane's to get
> anything right). And when you're all done getting spoon-fed the
facts
> think about which FIRST WORLD countries wouldn't take our side
after
> pre-emptive strikes. Talk is one thing (the French & Germans) but
you
> think they'll try to attack us after that? See, I TOLD you you
should
> have gotten out more when you had the chance.

Please, tell us again how a massive nuclear war will solve all the
problems of the world. While your at it, moron, do you really

believe

that Russia and China would standby while we destroy humanity?

Now there's a question....Russia & China. Dilapidated and outdated
sub fleets--both of them, and these subs are the ultimate weapon. All
of them can easily be taken out by our surface ships let alone subs.
Overrated....both of them, by liberals. Worried about by chicken
littles. Always an excuse---never any facts.

> >
> > > > We already know you have no conscience.
> > >
> > > So you agree that's the ONLY way to deal with these

barbarians.

> > Good. You have a conscience, you lose.
> >
> > Nope. I do know an alcoholic, brain-addled moron could never
> > understand what needs to be done.
>
> ???

Finally, the sum of all your intelligence.

I guess I've used up 100% of my brain!

> > > Otherwise you'd have quit
> > > > abusing your family long ago. No one is suprised that you'd
> take
> > > the
> > > > same approach to the rest of the world. Unfortunately, the
> world
> > > > would be unliveable after your solution ... or maybe you
think
> > > > nuclear winter would be an improvement?
> > >
> > > In a one-sided event like this, who cares what happens 'over
> > there'?
> >
> > LMAO. There is no "over there" when it comes to massive nuclear
> > attacks. You are beyond help.
>
> You are sooo naiive. Just like the nerds from years ago. An old

man

> still stuck in the past.

Please, tell us again how a massive nuclear war will solve all the
problems of the world. Do the voices tell you this? How long have

you

been hearing these voices? We already know you haven't had an
original though in several decades.

> >
> > > Saving this country is the only thing that matters. Maybe
you're
> OK
> > > with losing Cleveland or SF or NYC, as a method of making

peace

> > with
> > > these losers. With you in charge that's just what would

happen--

> > > they'd have the time and the resources to go ahead with it.
BOOM!
> >
> > With your approach we lose them all and the rest of the

country.

> have another drink and try again tomorrow.
>
> Admit it. All you care about is losing the video poker machines

and

> nothing else. But then again, you really have nothing else to

live

> for.

Here's the drunken draft dodger looking in the mirror again. You
don't even have the balls to respond on this forum without a couple
of drinks so I know you'll never face me on the tennis court.

OOPS! Another blooper by the dicker! I KNOW you're not gonna get any
sleep tonight!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

Just like with Michael Jackson. He SEEMS guilty to the rest of us,

but the jury that was there ALL THE TIME said he wasn't. We gonna
trust a grump like John here or the jury to be right? The civil cases
after the criminal hearings are something I don't understand. OJ/MJ are
PROVEN innocent beyond a shadow of a doubt unanimously in painstaking
hearings,<<<

A jury verdict of not guilty doesn't mean innocent, it menas not proven
beyond a reasonable doubt. The European term of not proven is probably
more correct then our term not guilty. I don't think there are any
intelligent people think OJ is innocent of that brutal double homicide.

then people are allowed to take a second, less qualifying shot at

them for monetary purposes. What's the point? Why then not give them a
THIRD crack at it, where if there's a 50-50 or greater jury vote,
the 'victim's' family could throw pies at the defendant.<<<

I actually like that suggestion, or perhaps they could be forced to
read all postings on free^2, and if the crime was particularly heinous,
they would be forced to read all the postings on vpfree!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The European term of not proven is
probably more correct then our term not guilty. I don't think there are
any intelligent people think OJ is innocent of that brutal double
homicide.

The jury decides whether a person either did it or they didn't. Not
guilty = innocent of all charges. OJ's jury said the evidence presented
told them HE DID NOT KILL THEM. They weren't asked to play with words.
Nothing can ever be "proven" unless there's unaltered video tape and a
confession. My question remains to people who go on saying he's not
innocent: Are you more in tune with 100% of the facts presented before
the court than the jury is? What's the reasonable answer here? Of
course. The jury knows more about the case than you.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_mavin" <vp_mavin@...> wrote:

A jury verdict of not guilty doesn't mean innocent, it menas not

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > Well, I guess that lets Ted Kennedy off the hook, or ... is
> Robbie
> > > contradicting himself ONE MORE TIME.
> >
> > Fact: Kennedy KILLED Mary Jo Kopeckne, and his family helped

sway

> law
> > enforcement to wash it all away. No money was paid to anyone.
>
> "If (O'Reilly/Kennedy) did something wrong as you say, he'd be
behind
> bars right now where he should be if that's the case." Your own
words moron.

You're confused as usual---or maybe you NEED to act confused so you
don't look so stupid. "IF O'Reilly did something wrong" were the
words--be a good geek and look it up this time.

Your own words moron implied that the system always works. The name
wasn't important to your statement. What part of always don't you
understand? Of course, intelligent people realize the system falters
over and over. OJ is a prime example. DNA testing has proven that
innocent people have been convicted of crimes they did not do. Please
continue to respond and make youself look dumber and dumber.

>
> > Fact: O'Reilly was ACCUSED of SAYING things that were never
> > substantiated. O'Reilly countersued the accuser. No money is
known to have exchanged hands. For as many people that say O'Reilly
paid the broad off, there's twicew as many who believe she paid HIM
off---whether it be in the form of money or a blow job, doesn't
matter.
> >
> > Whoops little dicky.....sorry to make you eat crow YET AGAIN.
>
> LMAO. You must really work overtime to look STUPID. I never

stated

> anything about O'Reilly. Are you answering your own posts now? I
hope that crow tastes good, dufus. You have several more courses
coming up.

Whooooosh! Striaght over your head!! AGAIN!!!! Are you THAT dumb?

I'd

cut and paste your original comment(response) that was posted in
response to multiple words of wisdom by your pal, but I know you'll
do it and try to make all this go away anyway.

Please do. This drunken attempt to save face once again will not
work. The rest of us know how to read.

I've served you enough
crow in the past

At your own table I presume.

so I'll let up some here just for you little
dicky....just for you!

Nice try, dufus. I won't let up because I caught you in a lie ONE
MORE TIME.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> > > > > It was pretty bad for awhile. Much improved over the last

6

> > > months.
> > > > > Isn't it nice to know that you've been trumped by me ...
> again.
> > > >
> > > > The only people who go to it now are degenerate locals like
you
> > and
> > > > Mrs. addict, and they make believe it's the gourmet meal of

a

> > > > lifetime. Those type dufuses enjoy low-life buffets, greasy
> spoon
> > > > cafes, and quick in-and-out type joints just so they can

get

> > their gambling in with as little interruption as possible.
> > >
> > > LMAO. It really gets to you to be shown up again. If you quit
> > trying
> > > to pass on your opinion as fact you wouldn't get into this

kind

> of
> > > predicament. Your idiotic attempts to sound like you know
> anything
> > at all about LV is hilarious. Have another drink, dufus.
> >
> > What got to you this time----the "degenerate locals" part? No
> wonder
> > your upset. The truth again.
>
> Let me know the first time you and the truth get together. It

would

a first.

Impossible to get anything through to anyone who stays out all

night

playing video poker. The mind becomes mush after 2 hours. That
explains why you're all over the map.

Sorry, dufus, I never play VP all night. Are you ever right? Nope.

>
> > If I left it up to you, you'd
> > marginalize the gourmet restaurants all over the Strip
> > as "overpriced" and "you're paying for the name" because you
can't
> > afford to go to them---which you really could if you didn't

lose

> all
> > your money in the cheap joints. I'm betting the acid's really
> flowing
> > in that oversized belly right about now!
>
> If it's so oversized why are you scared silly to play me in

tennis?

> Your the biggest coward I've ever encountered. No, go change your
> diaper. I know it gets wet every time I mention tennis.

I guess you're feeling pretty silly right about now little dicky!

Nope, because I know you'll never show.

>
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is that the laughing thing you're struggling with
> explaining?
> > > > >
> > > > > No struggle. I suspect your granddaughter

was "mesmerized"

by
> > you
> > > > > constantly licking the TV screen.
> > > >
> > > > She can't reach it yet.
> > >
> > > ROTFLMAO. Put that drink down and reread my comment. You are
such
> a
> > > dufus. Your stupidity is unmatched.
> >
> > If you learned sentence structure in school (oh, that's
> > right....nerds only cared about statistics, drafting,
trigonometry
> > and Latin) you'd figure it out without me giving you thses

hints.

>
> Too late. ROTFLMAO. Now, put down that drink and go to bed, your
wife will be home soon and she'd prefer you were sleeping.

I know. You're trying to impress that dufus who said he liked your
letters instead of responses! I'm so good it really hurts now!

I'm right on target again. Nothing to say, dufus? Did you ever
consider your wife ISN'T working late, but out with a REAL man?

> > > > I didn't vote for the fat boy so why would you corrupt my
input
> > as having anything whatsoever to do with such a criminal?
> > >
> > > Doesn't change the fact you contradicted yourself in the very
> next
> > > sentence. You do this constantly. You don't even realize it.
It's
> > > like your brain is disconnected from your fingers and mouth.
> >
> > If you even read your own writing you'd see you're

contracdicting

> > both you AND me in the same sentences.
>
> Too late, moron. We all can see you're so drunk you don't even

know

> what you're doing. This is great.

I'm wondering if you played 6 hours or 10 from the looks of things
here.

I got home before 4:00PM. (Are you always wrong? Yes.) After that I
have no need to drown my sorrows in an alcoholic frenzy like you do.
I read your posts, get a good belly laugh, exercise, watch a little
TV and hit the hay (that means go to bed, dufus).

>
> > I'll bet you wake up each
> > morning with a criticizm of your wife rolling out of your

mouth.

> Just
> > like get with your plethora of mistakes here, I can hear a loud
> SLAP
> > in the distance. But all is forgiven moments later after you
> announce
> > which casino you're taking her to today. Addicts will be

addicts!

>
> Have another drink, dufus. Maybe then you could come up with an
> original line. What? You don't understand what the

word "original"

> means? I didn't think so.

YUP! 10.

And I know how you got there,
1,2,3,4,3,4,2,5,4,5,6,3,4,8,4,7,9,7,8,2,3,7,10?

> > > > > Some would say GWB is a "murderer that got away with it".

A

> > > charge that might stand up in some courts.
> > > >
> > > > Then let's put $10k on that right now! More facts little
dicky?
> > > then
> > > > back it up!! I'll even give you the number----ONE court. If
> even
> > > ONE
> > > > court convicts him and sends him away, you win! Otherwise,
it's
> > > just
> > > > that same 'ol feel-good nonsense you're famous for.
> > >
> > > I meant the court of world opinion, dufus.
> >
> > Ahumma ahumma ahumma ahumma..... Figure it out first, banana

head.

>
> I have it all figured out dufus, only you don't like the fact

that

I am right one more time.

YUP! 10 it is!

Now, you're using you IQ as a response ... The screen getting a
little blury?

> > I suspect if a vote were
> > > taken today that GWB would be found guilty in the majority of
> > > countries in the world.
> >
> > Gets your facts straight, bozo. What's up here----voting or
> > hearings?? You'd suspect just about anything with an approach
like
> > that.
>
> The facts are simple. The vast majority of people in the WORLD
> believe GWB is a criminal and would find him guilty. Now, put

down

> that drink, give your 8x10 glossy of GWB a big hug and go to bed.

More quoting from that 'fact sheet'? Oh please stop it now---I

can't

stop buckling over in giggles!!

I believe the "buckling over".

>
> > I know, you'd just nuke-em if they disagree
> > > with you and your fantasy boy. How's your tongue? Has it
> recovered
> > > from the SOTU?
> >
> > I love it when you show your frustration with a president that
> stuffs
> > it back into the faces of the liberals every time they try to

one-

> up
> > him. He makes them...and therefore you...look sooo bad it's
almost
> > embarrassing for me to have to sit thru it all.
>
> LMAO. The tougue must still be a little sore.

I see you mised one. Can't see very well when your so drunk?

>
> > >

we

> > should
> > > > > just go to the Afghan-Pakistani border and set off a

dozen

> > nukes
> > > > > that'll kill most or all of the Al-Q leaders.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Or ... maybe just kill a lot of innocent people, give
> > Muslims
> > > > > good reasons to hate America, create a few thousand more
> OBLs,
> > > and
> > > > > give
> > > > > > > America a black eye in the rest of the world that

would

> be
> > > > > > impossible to remove. Good idea, moron.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Typical twisted and cowardly logic. If we don't create
> > millions
> > > > of
> > > > > > collateral victims while blasting the terrorist leaders
> into
> > > > Allah-land over there, you and I will become THEIR

collateral

> > > damage
> > > > over here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another completely illogical statement. You do this so
often
> > and
> > > > > don't even realize it. I guess that what happens when you
> have
> > NO
> > > > > facts to back up your childish assertions.
> > > >
> > > > I noticed you stopped cold when it was time to explain your
> > > nonsense.
> > >
> > > Everyone can plainly see your ridiculous ideas are childish

and

> > > irrational. Nothing else needs to be explained.
> >
> > Translation: you agree with me but don't want to say it here.
>
> No, that must be the liquor fogging your already diminished
thinking.

And another one.

>
> > > > I won't push and make you sweat for now. But here's another
> piece
> > > of
> > > > reality for you to stew over. Actially, two.
> > > > 1) Today God blessed the world by sinking a shithole ferry
> > between
> > > > Egypt & Saudi Arabia. 1000 possible Islamist extremists
> > eliminated.
> > > > 2) Denmark publishes a picture of the Maniacal Muslim

Prophet

> > with
> > > a
> > > > bomb as a turbin, causing world-wide Muslim protests,
violence,
> > and
> > > > crazed reactions. Just like with you, the truth sets them
off.
> If
> > > the
> > > > LIVING Pope was drawn with his dick in his hand, do you

think

> HIS
> > > > followers would react in such moronic proportions? There's

a

> good
> > > > reason for you to wake up and realize that the only good
Muslim
> > is
> > > a
> > > > dead Muslim. You can't just sit back and negotiate with

such

> > > animals, you can't expect to wage wars with every country in
> which
> > they hide, and you can't worry about killing ten thousand of

them

> > just to get one or two fanatical leaders. They represent such a
> poor,
> > > downtrodden slice of society that they have nothing to lose

by

> > rebelling after a leader is destroyed.
> > >
> > > Have another drink. It helps portray the real Rob Singer, an
> > abusive and moronic individual.
> >
> > Tell me I didn't expect that from one who hasn't a grasp on the
> world
> > situation..... You make me look better every passing moment,

and

I
> > don't even NEED your support!
>
> No, you need professional help. Please, tell us again how a

massive

> nuclear war will solve all the problems of the world.

Oops--you need more help. MASSIVE nuclear war? With whom?

Your scenario, dufus. Your brain appears to have quit functioning
altogether.

>
> > >
> > > > > > > > We don't know where they're hidden
> > > > > > > > but we know they're there somewhere. Bury them

alive

or
> > > blow
> > > > > them to bits. So what if we kill millions of innocents--
> simple
> > > > > casualties of war, and almost every one of them in that
area
> > will be put out of their misery anyway. The main purpose after
the
> > kill? No remaining Al-Q will mess with our country again. They
only
> > > > understand and respect
> > > > > > > > viscious violence, and they use our coddled,

pacifist

> > ways
> > > > > > against us while they slowly peel away. One BIG message
> would
> > > > eliminate the threat forever.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you really this naive? It would NOT remove the
> threat.
> > > > > Instead,
> > > > > > > it would multiply the threat 100 times over. You

really

> > > should
> > > > > try
> > > > > > > using that wasted space above your neck every now and
> then.
> > > > Have
> > > > > > you ever read a history book in your life?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your position is that of most sissified scardy cats in
the
> > > > country.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, my position is actually much closer to GWBs' position
> then
> > > your
> > > > > idiotic "nuke em" plan. So, it appears you think GWB is
> > a "scardy
> > > > > cat".
> > > >
> > > > Where'd you pull that out of?
> > >
> > > So far GWB hasn't nuked anyone.
> >
> > Duh! Give me a few days to check that statement out.
>
> I'll give you all the time you need. For most people that's about

a

> nanosecond, for you it may takes several years.

Poor dufus Robbie can't respond anymore.

>
> > >
> > > > First, you're position is one of
> > > > cowardice. Does the great GWB sound like a back-off coward

to

> > you??
> > >
> > > The draft dodger has the gall to call someone else a coward.
You
> > are
> > > the epitomy of cowardice. You ran when faced with honorably
> serving
> > > your country.
> >
> > HELLO! I wasn't involved in the hippie draft!
>
> Coward.
>
> > It was a method of
> > weeding out the do-nothings and the low lifes anyway. Instead

and

> > unlike you--who hide in the bowels of corporate America after a
> short
> > stint smoking dope in the military--I served the US Gov't. for
TEN
> > years.
>
> Coward.
>
> >
> > You are the putrid smell at the bottem of that bottle
> > > you are drinking to forget your failures. You can't eliminate
the
> > > stench because YOU are the stench.
> >
> > As a matter of fact, I'm on my 2nd Jack Daniels Single Barrel
right
> > now!
>
> Was there ever a doubt?
>
> > Premium pour. No stench.
>
> In your hands, plenty of stench.
>
> > You'd know that if you didn't spend so
> > much time in those dumps you take your addict wife to. But who
> knows.
> > Maybe that's all she's worth. I mean, pathological gamblers are

a

> > dime a dozen in that scumbag town.
>
> We're still waiting for that original thought, dufus.

That I can tell. After all, who DOESN'T know about your tasteless
family.....

Everyone. I don't have any need to discuss them on a forum. You have
the NEED because you live through them vicariously due to your
failures in life. It's so easy to see right through you.

>
> > >
> > > > > > You're afraid that your daily visits to degenerate
casinos
> > > would
> > > > be
> > > > > > disrupted, or you might have to hold a gun for a

change.

> > > Explain
> > > > > > where the 'threat' would come from if we wiped out

their

> > > leaders,
> > > > >
> > > > > The other billion Muslims.
> > > >
> > > > One billion Muslims against a super-power. You need to

brush

up
> > on
> > > > modern warfare.
> > >
> > > You need to read a little history and understand the real
> > capabilites
> > > of our armed forces. Do you really think we'd stand up

against

a
> > > worldwide force against us? Do you think they'd support us
after
> a
> > > pre-emptive nuclear strike? Robbie, the dufus, shows his
> > intelligence level once again.
> >
> > Tell me, are you afraid of your own shadow too?
>
> I served my country while you ran and hid in a sewer of a

country.

> The stench is still part of you and will always be part of you. I
> wonder who everyone believes is afraid of their shadow? Yes,

dufus,

> it's you.

Yet another one.

>
> > And I'm surprised at
> > how really really stupid you are when it comes to reality. Or
even
> > your famous fallback--'theory'--in this case. Think of the
> countries
> > where the Muslim scum hang out. How many have nukes, and how

many

> can
> > deliver them this far? Then take a guess at how many are

closeby

an
> > ocean or large waterway. Then look up how many LA class subs
we've
> > got prowling the seas and how many multi-warhead tipped nuclear
> > missiles are on them and what kind of destruction they can dish
> out.
> > Then figure out what aircraft carry similar weaponry (I know,

an

> > unlearned geek like you would have to reference Jane's to get
> > anything right). And when you're all done getting spoon-fed the
> facts
> > think about which FIRST WORLD countries wouldn't take our side
> after
> > pre-emptive strikes. Talk is one thing (the French & Germans)

but

> you
> > think they'll try to attack us after that? See, I TOLD you you
> should
> > have gotten out more when you had the chance.
>
> Please, tell us again how a massive nuclear war will solve all

the

> problems of the world. While your at it, moron, do you really
believe
> that Russia and China would standby while we destroy humanity?

Now there's a question....Russia & China. Dilapidated and outdated
sub fleets--both of them, and these subs are the ultimate weapon.

All

of them can easily be taken out by our surface ships let alone

subs.

Overrated....both of them, by liberals. Worried about by chicken
littles. Always an excuse---never any facts.

LMAO. You never hesitate to make foolish, drunken claims are simply
not backed up by the facts.

>
> > >
> > > > > We already know you have no conscience.
> > > >
> > > > So you agree that's the ONLY way to deal with these
barbarians.
> > > Good. You have a conscience, you lose.
> > >
> > > Nope. I do know an alcoholic, brain-addled moron could never
> > > understand what needs to be done.
> >
> > ???
>
> Finally, the sum of all your intelligence.

I guess I've used up 100% of my brain!

Do I think the liquor has decimated 100% of your capabilities.
ABSOLUTELY.

> > > > Otherwise you'd have quit
> > > > > abusing your family long ago. No one is suprised that

you'd

> > take
> > > > the
> > > > > same approach to the rest of the world. Unfortunately,

the

> > world
> > > > > would be unliveable after your solution ... or maybe you
> think
> > > > > nuclear winter would be an improvement?
> > > >
> > > > In a one-sided event like this, who cares what

happens 'over

> > > there'?
> > >
> > > LMAO. There is no "over there" when it comes to massive

nuclear

> > > attacks. You are beyond help.
> >
> > You are sooo naiive. Just like the nerds from years ago. An old
man
> > still stuck in the past.
>
> Please, tell us again how a massive nuclear war will solve all

the

> problems of the world. Do the voices tell you this? How long have
you
> been hearing these voices? We already know you haven't had an
> original though in several decades.

The dufus missed another one.

>
> > >
> > > > Saving this country is the only thing that matters. Maybe
> you're
> > OK
> > > > with losing Cleveland or SF or NYC, as a method of making
peace
> > > with
> > > > these losers. With you in charge that's just what would
happen--
> > > > they'd have the time and the resources to go ahead with it.
> BOOM!
> > >
> > > With your approach we lose them all and the rest of the
country.
> > have another drink and try again tomorrow.
> >
> > Admit it. All you care about is losing the video poker machines
and
> > nothing else. But then again, you really have nothing else to
live
> > for.
>
> Here's the drunken draft dodger looking in the mirror again. You
> don't even have the balls to respond on this forum without a

couple

> of drinks so I know you'll never face me on the tennis court.

OOPS! Another blooper by the dicker! I KNOW you're not gonna get

any

sleep tonight!!

I slept great knowing you'd continue to slobber and make fool of your
self. How's the headache?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On the contrary. In my comments last night I said