Yeah, really, Scot.
My opinion is that the following statement reeks of hostility:
"Discussion of the Singer system(s) on vpFREE is discouraged,
but is appropriate on FREEvpFREE...."
It is hostile to say that any discussions about something like
someone's "system of playing video poker" is not appropriate
on vpFREE.
Apparently, it's okay discuss (and even disagree with each
other) about various other aspects of playing video poker.
But, not if it relates to Singer or his method. Yes, Frank, that's
hostile (see definition below).
I use the word 'reek' because the hostility is so obvious to me.
And, I still do not believe that the vpFREE administrator is not
aware of widespread vehemence or hostility toward Rob Singer.
From "Dictionary.com": hos·tile
~adjective
1. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of an enemy: a hostile nation.
2. opposed in feeling, action, or character; antagonistic: hostile
criticism.
3. characterized by antagonism.
4. not friendly, warm, or generous; not hospitable.
~noun
5. a person or thing that is antagonistic or unfriendly.
6. Military. an enemy soldier, plane, ship, etc.
···
On 8/30/07, fayokoyama <FYokoyama@aol.com> wrote:
i agree with Scot. imo the faq does not come close to "reeking of
hostility."
Frank
— In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Scot Krause" <krauseinvegas@…>
wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vpF…@…com]On
Behalf Of Curtis Rich
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:46 PM
> To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Singer revisited
>
> I find it hard to believe that you are unaware of hostility toward
> Rob Singer. Your own vpFREE FAQ about him reeks of hostility.
>
> http://members.cox.net/vpfree/FAQ.htm#50
>
>
> Really? What would you consider to be hostile in there? It's sound
> factual to me. I think even Rob himself would agree that's it's
accurate.
>
> Scot
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]