vpFREE2 Forums

Singer Backs Away

#1

Hey Jim, thanks for the update. Singer has posted (lied) on this
forum that Fez backed down. It's nice to see the truth.

ROTFLMAO. Robbie, my boy, you are such a loser. I think we can all
rest easy now. Rob only had to win a single session to win the bet.
Using Rob's own claims he should be an 88% favorite to win (75% by my
figures). But, what happens? Robbie backs down. Anyone with half a
brain can figure this out. Robbie couldn't come up with his part of
the bet. ABSOLUTE PROOF that Robbie has been lying about this results
for years.

So, let's hear it Robbie. Tell us why you wouldn't accept a bet where
YOU were significantly favored and lied these last 9 months claiming
it was Fez who backed down. Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle ... How sweet
it is ...

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson <meldrone@...> wrote:

Another public vote re 'singer', from the subject
thread:

DUDE--

1. What difference does it make if you can prove you
can win $2,500 15 straight times, only to lose $40,000
on your 16th time!!! So your a winner 15 out of 16
sessions and are still an overall loser!!!

You FREAKING DISGUST ME that you put this crap in
print and actually have people believe in your
nonsense BS!!

I had a friend in Vegas that committed suicide by
hanging himself in a hotel room playing some stupid
doubleup-like system such as you preach.........again,
you are disgusting and not even funny anymore.

2. Enough also of the BS of you showing us your W2-G'S
or wanting to COMPARE yours with others. One could
have a million dollars in W2-G signings and that
proves NOTHING of your overall win.............STOP
WITH THE BULLSHIT.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THIS BOARD-----SPREAD THE WORD
TO EVERYBODY AND ANYBODY YOU KNOW TO AVOID THIS GUYS
WRITINGS AND NONSENSE AT ALL COSTS.

-FISHHEAD-

#2

You're such a clown, little dicky. When you stop holding hands with
jimmy in order to build your confidence up, I'm sure you'll find time
to re-read the GT articles that clearly spell out how his pal Fezzik
was running away as fast as he can with a whimper and a whine. Sort
of like you always do---except he actually accepted a bet BEFORE
adding in conditions. His loophole & escape only made my publisher
more willing to front-page the column. You lucked out--you hide
between the covers!

Hey Jim, thanks for the update. Singer has posted (lied) on this
forum that Fez backed down. It's nice to see the truth.

ROTFLMAO. Robbie, my boy, you are such a loser. I think we can all
rest easy now. Rob only had to win a single session to win the bet.
Using Rob's own claims he should be an 88% favorite to win (75% by

my

figures). But, what happens? Robbie backs down. Anyone with half a
brain can figure this out. Robbie couldn't come up with his part of
the bet. ABSOLUTE PROOF that Robbie has been lying about this

results

for years.

So, let's hear it Robbie. Tell us why you wouldn't accept a bet

where

YOU were significantly favored and lied these last 9 months

claiming

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

it was Fez who backed down. Chuckle, chuckle, chuckle ... How sweet
it is ...

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson <meldrone@> wrote:
>
> Another public vote re 'singer', from the subject
> thread:
>
> DUDE--
>
> 1. What difference does it make if you can prove you
> can win $2,500 15 straight times, only to lose $40,000
> on your 16th time!!! So your a winner 15 out of 16
> sessions and are still an overall loser!!!
>
> You FREAKING DISGUST ME that you put this crap in
> print and actually have people believe in your
> nonsense BS!!
>
> I had a friend in Vegas that committed suicide by
> hanging himself in a hotel room playing some stupid
> doubleup-like system such as you preach.........again,
> you are disgusting and not even funny anymore.
>
> 2. Enough also of the BS of you showing us your W2-G'S
> or wanting to COMPARE yours with others. One could
> have a million dollars in W2-G signings and that
> proves NOTHING of your overall win.............STOP
> WITH THE BULLSHIT.
>
> LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THIS BOARD-----SPREAD THE WORD
> TO EVERYBODY AND ANYBODY YOU KNOW TO AVOID THIS GUYS
> WRITINGS AND NONSENSE AT ALL COSTS.
>
> -FISHHEAD-

#3

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

You're such a clown, little dicky. When you stop holding hands with
jimmy in order to build your confidence up, I'm sure you'll find

time

to re-read the GT articles that clearly spell out how his pal

Fezzik

was running away as fast as he can with a whimper and a whine. Sort
of like you always do---except he actually accepted a bet BEFORE
adding in conditions. His loophole & escape only made my publisher
more willing to front-page the column. You lucked out--you hide
between the covers!

ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all read. Fezzik said "I accept".
You backed down. It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every reader
who posted on that forum agreed and every reader here who takes the
time to read the exchange will come to the EXACT same conclusion. Of
course, we've all seen you do the exact same thing here. Back out of
every bet. To make this even more humorous, you want us to read YOUR
fantasized version of the bet instead of the EXACT exchange that led
to your cowardly actions. I think it's pretty obvious why GT doesn't
want you proposing any more bets. You are such a loser.

#4

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> You're such a clown, little dicky. When you stop holding hands

with

> jimmy in order to build your confidence up, I'm sure you'll find
time
> to re-read the GT articles that clearly spell out how his pal
Fezzik
> was running away as fast as he can with a whimper and a whine.

Sort

> of like you always do---except he actually accepted a bet BEFORE
> adding in conditions. His loophole & escape only made my

publisher

> more willing to front-page the column. You lucked out--you hide
> between the covers!

ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all read. Fezzik said "I

accept". You backed down.

Apparently you chose not to read where I said "I accept, and since
you asked me to accept added stipulations here's mine". But that's
OK. Why would you read that??

It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every reader

who posted on that forum agreed and every reader here who takes the
time to read the exchange will come to the EXACT same conclusion.

Of course, we've all seen you do the exact same thing here. Back out
of every bet. To make this even more humorous, you want us to read
YOUR fantasized version of the bet instead of the EXACT exchange that
led to your cowardly actions. I think it's pretty obvious why GT
doesn't want you proposing any more bets. You are such a loser.

Oops little dicky---you're 'caught again'! Now I see you are just
just making it up as you go. He who 'backed down' was Fezzik when he
wouldn't accept my simple condition after I accepted his surprises.
And that's where the power of the press comes in--The truth remains
all right there, forever, in B&W for the world to read whenever
they'd like. Try it. It'll burn you even MORE!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#5

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > You're such a clown, little dicky. When you stop holding hands
with
> > jimmy in order to build your confidence up, I'm sure you'll

find

> time
> > to re-read the GT articles that clearly spell out how his pal
> Fezzik
> > was running away as fast as he can with a whimper and a whine.
Sort
> > of like you always do---except he actually accepted a bet

BEFORE

> > adding in conditions. His loophole & escape only made my
publisher
> > more willing to front-page the column. You lucked out--you hide
> > between the covers!
>
> ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all read. Fezzik said "I
accept". You backed down.

Apparently you chose not to read where I said "I accept, and since
you asked me to accept added stipulations here's mine". But that's
OK. Why would you read that??

He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by demanding new terms (and
of course had he accepted those you would have come up with others.
We've all seen it before.). You're a complete fraud and it's clear to
anyone who can read.

It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every reader
> who posted on that forum agreed and every reader here who takes

the

> time to read the exchange will come to the EXACT same conclusion.
Of course, we've all seen you do the exact same thing here. Back

out

of every bet. To make this even more humorous, you want us to read
YOUR fantasized version of the bet instead of the EXACT exchange

that

led to your cowardly actions. I think it's pretty obvious why GT
doesn't want you proposing any more bets. You are such a loser.

Oops little dicky---you're 'caught again'!

We can all see who has been "caught". Little Robbie, who claims to
have won so much, couldn't come up with the cash. How sweet it is ...

Now I see you are just
just making it up as you go. He who 'backed down' was Fezzik when

he

wouldn't accept my simple condition after I accepted his surprises.
And that's where the power of the press comes in--The truth remains
all right there, forever, in B&W for the world to read whenever
they'd like. Try it. It'll burn you even MORE!

If Robbie wrote for a sports magazine I'm sure New England would have
won this year's Super Bowl and the Red Sox would have won the World
Series. Guess what, you don't, they didn't. The same holds for the
bet, YOU backed down, not Fezzik. It all there in B&W for all to
read. How sweet it is ...

#6

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > You're such a clown, little dicky. When you stop holding

hands

> with
> > > jimmy in order to build your confidence up, I'm sure you'll
find
> > time
> > > to re-read the GT articles that clearly spell out how his pal
> > Fezzik
> > > was running away as fast as he can with a whimper and a

whine.

> Sort
> > > of like you always do---except he actually accepted a bet
BEFORE
> > > adding in conditions. His loophole & escape only made my
> publisher
> > > more willing to front-page the column. You lucked out--you

hide

> > > between the covers!
> >
> > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all read. Fezzik said "I
> accept". You backed down.
>
> Apparently you chose not to read where I said "I accept, and

since

> you asked me to accept added stipulations here's mine". But

that's

> OK. Why would you read that??

He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by demanding new terms

Another case of your not being smart enough to read correctly. I
proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to do, he accepted "with
stipulations", I accepted "with one stipulation" and he ran, not
thinking I would accept because he's like you--he could NEVER come up
with even half that cash! And another clear victory for Singer over
anybody!!

> It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every reader
> > who posted on that forum agreed and every reader here who takes
the
> > time to read the exchange will come to the EXACT same

conclusion.

> Of course, we've all seen you do the exact same thing here. Back
out
> of every bet. To make this even more humorous, you want us to

read

> YOUR fantasized version of the bet instead of the EXACT exchange
that
> led to your cowardly actions. I think it's pretty obvious why GT
> doesn't want you proposing any more bets. You are such a loser.
>
> Oops little dicky---you're 'caught again'!

We can all see who has been "caught". Little Robbie, who claims to
have won so much, couldn't come up with the cash. How sweet it

is ...

Oops again little dicky!! Did you read the part in my column where I
deposited $740,000--and verified by the publisher before printing--at
the Westin??? Gosh, golly gee little dicky......but I truly am sorry.
Whadaya gonna say about them apples. As I said---you're such a clown
who's only reason for being here is to look stupid.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#7

Which mental illness is that? The one where somebody
proceeds under an alias, gets revealed by the written
word to be a four-flusher and a coward, and then
claims "a clear victory over anybody"?

The cocktail of schizophrenia and narcissism is
difficult to pin down.

···

-- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@cox.net> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain"
<rgmustain@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111"
<rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> > > > You're such a clown, little dicky. When you
stop holding
hands
> > with
> > > > jimmy in order to build your confidence up,
I'm sure you'll
> find
> > > time
> > > > to re-read the GT articles that clearly
spell out how his pal
> > > Fezzik
> > > > was running away as fast as he can with a
whimper and a
whine.
> > Sort
> > > > of like you always do---except he actually
accepted a bet
> BEFORE
> > > > adding in conditions. His loophole & escape
only made my
> > publisher
> > > > more willing to front-page the column. You
lucked out--you
hide
> > > > between the covers!
> > >
> > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all read.
Fezzik said "I
> > accept". You backed down.
> >
> > Apparently you chose not to read where I said "I
accept, and
since
> > you asked me to accept added stipulations here's
mine". But
that's
> > OK. Why would you read that??
>
> He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by
demanding new terms

Another case of your not being smart enough to read
correctly. I
proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to do, he
accepted "with
stipulations", I accepted "with one stipulation" and
he ran, not
thinking I would accept because he's like you--he
could NEVER come up
with even half that cash! And another clear victory
for Singer over
anybody!!

> > It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every
reader
> > > who posted on that forum agreed and every
reader here who takes
> the
> > > time to read the exchange will come to the
EXACT same
conclusion.
> > Of course, we've all seen you do the exact same
thing here. Back
> out
> > of every bet. To make this even more humorous,
you want us to
read
> > YOUR fantasized version of the bet instead of
the EXACT exchange
> that
> > led to your cowardly actions. I think it's
pretty obvious why GT
> > doesn't want you proposing any more bets. You
are such a loser.
> >
> > Oops little dicky---you're 'caught again'!
>
> We can all see who has been "caught". Little
Robbie, who claims to
> have won so much, couldn't come up with the cash.
How sweet it
is ...

Oops again little dicky!! Did you read the part in
my column where I
deposited $740,000--and verified by the publisher
before printing--at
the Westin??? Gosh, golly gee little dicky......but
I truly am sorry.
Whadaya gonna say about them apples. As I
said---you're such a clown
who's only reason for being here is to look stupid.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#8

I'm glad you appeared here. Poor little dicky needs as much help as
he can get here--as all of you do when I'm around! After a while and
after so many victories it starts to get me feeling a little guilty -
if you know what I mean. After all, I've transformed the entire
Fezzik Gang into bumbling fools more than once--and all on my own.
Hey, even the 'great & feared' Hissle is STILL trying to pick up his
pieces after facing me. So go get a few more of your touts and see
what you can come up with in defense of the dicker!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson <meldrone@...> wrote:

Which mental illness is that? The one where somebody
proceeds under an alias, gets revealed by the written
word to be a four-flusher and a coward, and then
claims "a clear victory over anybody"?

The cocktail of schizophrenia and narcissism is
difficult to pin down.

-- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain"
> <rgmustain@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111"
> <rsinger1111@>
> > wrote:
> > > > > You're such a clown, little dicky. When you
> stop holding
> hands
> > > with
> > > > > jimmy in order to build your confidence up,
> I'm sure you'll
> > find
> > > > time
> > > > > to re-read the GT articles that clearly
> spell out how his pal
> > > > Fezzik
> > > > > was running away as fast as he can with a
> whimper and a
> whine.
> > > Sort
> > > > > of like you always do---except he actually
> accepted a bet
> > BEFORE
> > > > > adding in conditions. His loophole & escape
> only made my
> > > publisher
> > > > > more willing to front-page the column. You
> lucked out--you
> hide
> > > > > between the covers!
> > > >
> > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all read.
> Fezzik said "I
> > > accept". You backed down.
> > >
> > > Apparently you chose not to read where I said "I
> accept, and
> since
> > > you asked me to accept added stipulations here's
> mine". But
> that's
> > > OK. Why would you read that??
> >
> > He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by
> demanding new terms
>
> Another case of your not being smart enough to read
> correctly. I
> proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to do, he
> accepted "with
> stipulations", I accepted "with one stipulation" and
> he ran, not
> thinking I would accept because he's like you--he
> could NEVER come up
> with even half that cash! And another clear victory
> for Singer over
> anybody!!
>
> > > It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every
> reader
> > > > who posted on that forum agreed and every
> reader here who takes
> > the
> > > > time to read the exchange will come to the
> EXACT same
> conclusion.
> > > Of course, we've all seen you do the exact same
> thing here. Back
> > out
> > > of every bet. To make this even more humorous,
> you want us to
> read
> > > YOUR fantasized version of the bet instead of
> the EXACT exchange
> > that
> > > led to your cowardly actions. I think it's
> pretty obvious why GT
> > > doesn't want you proposing any more bets. You
> are such a loser.
> > >
> > > Oops little dicky---you're 'caught again'!
> >
> > We can all see who has been "caught". Little
> Robbie, who claims to
> > have won so much, couldn't come up with the cash.
> How sweet it
> is ...
>
> Oops again little dicky!! Did you read the part in
> my column where I
> deposited $740,000--and verified by the publisher
> before printing--at
> the Westin??? Gosh, golly gee little dicky......but
> I truly am sorry.
> Whadaya gonna say about them apples. As I
> said---you're such a clown
> who's only reason for being here is to look stupid.
>
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#9

Your "so many victories" is everybody over there
saying you're a liar, an idiot and a coward. What
diagnosis has your provider given you for this grade
of hallucinatory behavior?

···

--- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@cox.net> wrote:

I'm glad you appeared here. Poor little dicky needs
as much help as
he can get here--as all of you do when I'm around!
After a while and
after so many victories it starts to get me feeling
a little guilty -
if you know what I mean. After all, I've transformed
the entire
Fezzik Gang into bumbling fools more than once--and
all on my own.
Hey, even the 'great & feared' Hissle is STILL
trying to pick up his
pieces after facing me. So go get a few more of your
touts and see
what you can come up with in defense of the dicker!

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson
<meldrone@...> wrote:
>
> Which mental illness is that? The one where
somebody
> proceeds under an alias, gets revealed by the
written
> word to be a four-flusher and a coward, and then
> claims "a clear victory over anybody"?
>
> The cocktail of schizophrenia and narcissism is
> difficult to pin down.
>
> -- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@...> wrote:
>
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain"
> > <rgmustain@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111"
> > <rsinger1111@>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > You're such a clown, little dicky. When
you
> > stop holding
> > hands
> > > > with
> > > > > > jimmy in order to build your confidence
up,
> > I'm sure you'll
> > > find
> > > > > time
> > > > > > to re-read the GT articles that clearly
> > spell out how his pal
> > > > > Fezzik
> > > > > > was running away as fast as he can with
a
> > whimper and a
> > whine.
> > > > Sort
> > > > > > of like you always do---except he
actually
> > accepted a bet
> > > BEFORE
> > > > > > adding in conditions. His loophole &
escape
> > only made my
> > > > publisher
> > > > > > more willing to front-page the column.
You
> > lucked out--you
> > hide
> > > > > > between the covers!
> > > > >
> > > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all
read.
> > Fezzik said "I
> > > > accept". You backed down.
> > > >
> > > > Apparently you chose not to read where I
said "I
> > accept, and
> > since
> > > > you asked me to accept added stipulations
here's
> > mine". But
> > that's
> > > > OK. Why would you read that??
> > >
> > > He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by
> > demanding new terms
> >
> > Another case of your not being smart enough to
read
> > correctly. I
> > proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to do,
he
> > accepted "with
> > stipulations", I accepted "with one stipulation"
and
> > he ran, not
> > thinking I would accept because he's like
you--he
> > could NEVER come up
> > with even half that cash! And another clear
victory
> > for Singer over
> > anybody!!
> >
> > > > It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every
> > reader
> > > > > who posted on that forum agreed and every
> > reader here who takes
> > > the
> > > > > time to read the exchange will come to the
> > EXACT same
> > conclusion.
> > > > Of course, we've all seen you do the exact
same
> > thing here. Back
> > > out
> > > > of every bet. To make this even more
humorous,
> > you want us to
> > read
> > > > YOUR fantasized version of the bet instead
of
> > the EXACT exchange
> > > that
> > > > led to your cowardly actions. I think it's
> > pretty obvious why GT
> > > > doesn't want you proposing any more bets.
You
> > are such a loser.
> > > >
> > > > Oops little dicky---you're 'caught again'!
> > >
> > > We can all see who has been "caught". Little
> > Robbie, who claims to
> > > have won so much, couldn't come up with the
cash.
> > How sweet it
> > is ...
> >
> > Oops again little dicky!! Did you read the part
in
> > my column where I
> > deposited $740,000--and verified by the
publisher
> > before printing--at
> > the Westin??? Gosh, golly gee little
dicky......but
> > I truly am sorry.
> > Whadaya gonna say about them apples. As I
> > said---you're such a clown
> > who's only reason for being here is to look
stupid.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#10

How's this--It took the whole group to save Fezzik from folding like
a wounded duck. So why wouldn't they come to the aid of a fallen
hero?? That was ESPECIALLY noted after my appearance on his show when
he had to have Hissle in the booth to hold his hand. All that did was
allow me to watch these two so-called 'giants' fall that much harder.
But what a surprise afterwards! It was the only show in the history
of YCBOI that was NOT put into the radio stations on-line archive.
I'd say they learned a lesson in who to take on and who to call names
from the safety of their computers. That's what your reading 'over
there' nowadays.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson <meldrone@...> wrote:

Your "so many victories" is everybody over there
saying you're a liar, an idiot and a coward. What
diagnosis has your provider given you for this grade
of hallucinatory behavior?

--- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

> I'm glad you appeared here. Poor little dicky needs
> as much help as
> he can get here--as all of you do when I'm around!
> After a while and
> after so many victories it starts to get me feeling
> a little guilty -
> if you know what I mean. After all, I've transformed
> the entire
> Fezzik Gang into bumbling fools more than once--and
> all on my own.
> Hey, even the 'great & feared' Hissle is STILL
> trying to pick up his
> pieces after facing me. So go get a few more of your
> touts and see
> what you can come up with in defense of the dicker!
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson
> <meldrone@> wrote:
> >
> > Which mental illness is that? The one where
> somebody
> > proceeds under an alias, gets revealed by the
> written
> > word to be a four-flusher and a coward, and then
> > claims "a clear victory over anybody"?
> >
> > The cocktail of schizophrenia and narcissism is
> > difficult to pin down.
> >
> > -- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain"
> > > <rgmustain@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111"
> > > <rsinger1111@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > You're such a clown, little dicky. When
> you
> > > stop holding
> > > hands
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > jimmy in order to build your confidence
> up,
> > > I'm sure you'll
> > > > find
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > to re-read the GT articles that clearly
> > > spell out how his pal
> > > > > > Fezzik
> > > > > > > was running away as fast as he can with
> a
> > > whimper and a
> > > whine.
> > > > > Sort
> > > > > > > of like you always do---except he
> actually
> > > accepted a bet
> > > > BEFORE
> > > > > > > adding in conditions. His loophole &
> escape
> > > only made my
> > > > > publisher
> > > > > > > more willing to front-page the column.
> You
> > > lucked out--you
> > > hide
> > > > > > > between the covers!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all
> read.
> > > Fezzik said "I
> > > > > accept". You backed down.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apparently you chose not to read where I
> said "I
> > > accept, and
> > > since
> > > > > you asked me to accept added stipulations
> here's
> > > mine". But
> > > that's
> > > > > OK. Why would you read that??
> > > >
> > > > He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by
> > > demanding new terms
> > >
> > > Another case of your not being smart enough to
> read
> > > correctly. I
> > > proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to do,
> he
> > > accepted "with
> > > stipulations", I accepted "with one stipulation"
> and
> > > he ran, not
> > > thinking I would accept because he's like
> you--he
> > > could NEVER come up
> > > with even half that cash! And another clear
> victory
> > > for Singer over
> > > anybody!!
> > >
> > > > > It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every
> > > reader
> > > > > > who posted on that forum agreed and every
> > > reader here who takes
> > > > the
> > > > > > time to read the exchange will come to the
> > > EXACT same
> > > conclusion.
> > > > > Of course, we've all seen you do the exact
> same
> > > thing here. Back
> > > > out
> > > > > of every bet. To make this even more
> humorous,
> > > you want us to
> > > read
> > > > > YOUR fantasized version of the bet instead
> of
> > > the EXACT exchange
> > > > that
> > > > > led to your cowardly actions. I think it's
> > > pretty obvious why GT
> > > > > doesn't want you proposing any more bets.
> You
> > > are such a loser.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oops little dicky---you're 'caught again'!
> > > >
> > > > We can all see who has been "caught". Little
> > > Robbie, who claims to
> > > > have won so much, couldn't come up with the
> cash.
> > > How sweet it
> > > is ...
> > >
> > > Oops again little dicky!! Did you read the part
> in
> > > my column where I
> > > deposited $740,000--and verified by the
> publisher
> > > before printing--at
> > > the Westin??? Gosh, golly gee little
> dicky......but
> > > I truly am sorry.
> > > Whadaya gonna say about them apples. As I
> > > said---you're such a clown
> > > who's only reason for being here is to look
> stupid.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#11

This is the "victory"? They delete your ranting from
the archives while everybody in the place says you're
a charlatan, a liar and a coward?

That's what they call a "hallucination".

···

--- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@cox.net> wrote:

How's this--It took the whole group to save Fezzik
from folding like
a wounded duck. So why wouldn't they come to the aid
of a fallen
hero?? That was ESPECIALLY noted after my appearance
on his show when
he had to have Hissle in the booth to hold his hand.
All that did was
allow me to watch these two so-called 'giants' fall
that much harder.
But what a surprise afterwards! It was the only show
in the history
of YCBOI that was NOT put into the radio stations
on-line archive.
I'd say they learned a lesson in who to take on and
who to call names
from the safety of their computers. That's what your
reading 'over
there' nowadays.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson
<meldrone@...> wrote:
>
> Your "so many victories" is everybody over there
> saying you're a liar, an idiot and a coward. What
> diagnosis has your provider given you for this
grade
> of hallucinatory behavior?
>
>
> --- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@...> wrote:
>
> > I'm glad you appeared here. Poor little dicky
needs
> > as much help as
> > he can get here--as all of you do when I'm
around!
> > After a while and
> > after so many victories it starts to get me
feeling
> > a little guilty -
> > if you know what I mean. After all, I've
transformed
> > the entire
> > Fezzik Gang into bumbling fools more than
once--and
> > all on my own.
> > Hey, even the 'great & feared' Hissle is STILL
> > trying to pick up his
> > pieces after facing me. So go get a few more of
your
> > touts and see
> > what you can come up with in defense of the
dicker!
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson
> > <meldrone@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Which mental illness is that? The one where
> > somebody
> > > proceeds under an alias, gets revealed by the
> > written
> > > word to be a four-flusher and a coward, and
then
> > > claims "a clear victory over anybody"?
> > >
> > > The cocktail of schizophrenia and narcissism
is
> > > difficult to pin down.
> > >
> > > -- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com,
"rgmustain"
> > > > <rgmustain@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com,
"rsing1111"
> > > > <rsinger1111@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > You're such a clown, little dicky.
When
> > you
> > > > stop holding
> > > > hands
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > jimmy in order to build your
confidence
> > up,
> > > > I'm sure you'll
> > > > > find
> > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > to re-read the GT articles that
clearly
> > > > spell out how his pal
> > > > > > > Fezzik
> > > > > > > > was running away as fast as he can
with
> > a
> > > > whimper and a
> > > > whine.
> > > > > > Sort
> > > > > > > > of like you always do---except he
> > actually
> > > > accepted a bet
> > > > > BEFORE
> > > > > > > > adding in conditions. His loophole &
> > escape
> > > > only made my
> > > > > > publisher
> > > > > > > > more willing to front-page the
column.
> > You
> > > > lucked out--you
> > > > hide
> > > > > > > > between the covers!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all
> > read.
> > > > Fezzik said "I
> > > > > > accept". You backed down.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apparently you chose not to read where I
> > said "I
> > > > accept, and
> > > > since
> > > > > > you asked me to accept added
stipulations
> > here's
> > > > mine". But
> > > > that's
> > > > > > OK. Why would you read that??
> > > > >
> > > > > He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by
> > > > demanding new terms
> > > >
> > > > Another case of your not being smart enough
to
> > read
> > > > correctly. I
> > > > proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to
do,
> > he
> > > > accepted "with
> > > > stipulations", I accepted "with one
stipulation"
> > and
> > > > he ran, not
> > > > thinking I would accept because he's like
> > you--he
> > > > could NEVER come up
> > > > with even half that cash! And another clear
> > victory
> > > > for Singer over
> > > > anybody!!
> > > >
> > > > > > It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that.
Every
> > > > reader
> > > > > > > who posted on that forum agreed and
every
> > > > reader here who takes
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > time to read the exchange will come to
the
> > > > EXACT same
> > > > conclusion.
> > > > > > Of course, we've all seen you do the
exact
> > same
> > > > thing here. Back
> > > > > out
> > > > > > of every bet. To make this even more
> > humorous,
> > > > you want us to
> > > > read
> > > > > > YOUR fantasized version of the bet
instead
> > of
> > > > the EXACT exchange
> > > > > that
> > > > > > led to your cowardly actions. I think
it's
> > > > pretty obvious why GT
> > > > > > doesn't want you proposing any more
bets.
> > You
> > > > are such a loser.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oops little dicky---you're 'caught
again'!
> > > > >
> > > > > We can all see who has been "caught".
Little
> > > > Robbie, who claims to
> > > > > have won so much, couldn't come up with
the
> > cash.
> > > > How sweet it
> > > > is ...
> > > >

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#12

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > You're such a clown, little dicky. When you stop holding
hands
> > with
> > > > jimmy in order to build your confidence up, I'm sure you'll
> find
> > > time
> > > > to re-read the GT articles that clearly spell out how his

pal

> > > Fezzik
> > > > was running away as fast as he can with a whimper and a
whine.
> > Sort
> > > > of like you always do---except he actually accepted a bet
> BEFORE
> > > > adding in conditions. His loophole & escape only made my
> > publisher
> > > > more willing to front-page the column. You lucked out--you
hide
> > > > between the covers!
> > >
> > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all read. Fezzik said "I
> > accept". You backed down.
> >
> > Apparently you chose not to read where I said "I accept, and
since
> > you asked me to accept added stipulations here's mine". But
that's
> > OK. Why would you read that??
>
> He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by demanding new terms

Another case of your not being smart enough to read correctly. I
proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to do, he accepted "with
stipulations", I accepted "with one stipulation" and he ran, not
thinking I would accept because he's like you--he could NEVER come

up

with even half that cash! And another clear victory for Singer over
anybody!!

Your idiotic "stipulations" had nothing to do with the actual bet.
That is why it is so easy to tell you were backing down. You had a
bet that favored you by 4-1. What did you do? You backed down. The
only conclusion any reasonable person can get from this is that you
couldn't come up with the cash. Of course, that pretty much tells a
story that YOU have been lying all along.

> > It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that. Every reader
> > > who posted on that forum agreed and every reader here who

takes

> the
> > > time to read the exchange will come to the EXACT same
conclusion.
> > Of course, we've all seen you do the exact same thing here.

Back

> out
> > of every bet. To make this even more humorous, you want us to
read
> > YOUR fantasized version of the bet instead of the EXACT

exchange

> that
> > led to your cowardly actions. I think it's pretty obvious why

GT

> > doesn't want you proposing any more bets. You are such a loser.
> >
> > Oops little dicky---you're 'caught again'!
>
> We can all see who has been "caught". Little Robbie, who claims

to

> have won so much, couldn't come up with the cash. How sweet it
is ...

Oops again little dicky!! Did you read the part in my column where

I

deposited $740,000--and verified by the publisher before printing--

at

the Westin???

Sorry, I don't read your idiotic column. You've proved to everyone
that you didn't have the cash by backing down from the Fezzik bet ...
and, therefore, you've been lying all along.

Hmmmm. Let's see, you go borrow money, deposit it in bank, and later
pay back the loan. Did I miss anything? Oh, and did I mention that
your publisher has NO credibility whatsoever. Anyone who would let a
narcissistic, mentally ill con man write a column for his paper is
pretty much a loser by anyone's definition.

Gosh, golly gee little dicky......but I truly am sorry.
Whadaya gonna say about them apples. As I said---you're such a

clown

who's only reason for being here is to look stupid.

Them "apples" are a lie. Anything else?

#13

Um, I kinda think that went just a tad bit over your head! Since the
plan was for the Bobsie Twins to gang up on me from the start, when
they discovered I was prepared for that and they began to fall apart
in the booth like chopped liver, the word went out halfway thru not
to archive the show. Fezzik's 'Team Face-Savers' as you like to
call 'everybody in the place' had no choice but to come to his rescue
and call me names after their fiasco---and they are still so
enthralled with anger over that and envy over me that a few still do.
Isn't it great!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson <meldrone@...> wrote:

This is the "victory"? They delete your ranting from
the archives while everybody in the place says you're
a charlatan, a liar and a coward?

That's what they call a "hallucination".

--- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

> How's this--It took the whole group to save Fezzik
> from folding like
> a wounded duck. So why wouldn't they come to the aid
> of a fallen
> hero?? That was ESPECIALLY noted after my appearance
> on his show when
> he had to have Hissle in the booth to hold his hand.
> All that did was
> allow me to watch these two so-called 'giants' fall
> that much harder.
> But what a surprise afterwards! It was the only show
> in the history
> of YCBOI that was NOT put into the radio stations
> on-line archive.
> I'd say they learned a lesson in who to take on and
> who to call names
> from the safety of their computers. That's what your
> reading 'over
> there' nowadays.
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson
> <meldrone@> wrote:
> >
> > Your "so many victories" is everybody over there
> > saying you're a liar, an idiot and a coward. What
> > diagnosis has your provider given you for this
> grade
> > of hallucinatory behavior?
> >
> >
> > --- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm glad you appeared here. Poor little dicky
> needs
> > > as much help as
> > > he can get here--as all of you do when I'm
> around!
> > > After a while and
> > > after so many victories it starts to get me
> feeling
> > > a little guilty -
> > > if you know what I mean. After all, I've
> transformed
> > > the entire
> > > Fezzik Gang into bumbling fools more than
> once--and
> > > all on my own.
> > > Hey, even the 'great & feared' Hissle is STILL
> > > trying to pick up his
> > > pieces after facing me. So go get a few more of
> your
> > > touts and see
> > > what you can come up with in defense of the
> dicker!
> > >
> > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson
> > > <meldrone@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Which mental illness is that? The one where
> > > somebody
> > > > proceeds under an alias, gets revealed by the
> > > written
> > > > word to be a four-flusher and a coward, and
> then
> > > > claims "a clear victory over anybody"?
> > > >
> > > > The cocktail of schizophrenia and narcissism
> is
> > > > difficult to pin down.
> > > >
> > > > -- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com,
> "rgmustain"
> > > > > <rgmustain@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com,
> "rsing1111"
> > > > > <rsinger1111@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > You're such a clown, little dicky.
> When
> > > you
> > > > > stop holding
> > > > > hands
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > jimmy in order to build your
> confidence
> > > up,
> > > > > I'm sure you'll
> > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > to re-read the GT articles that
> clearly
> > > > > spell out how his pal
> > > > > > > > Fezzik
> > > > > > > > > was running away as fast as he can
> with
> > > a
> > > > > whimper and a
> > > > > whine.
> > > > > > > Sort
> > > > > > > > > of like you always do---except he
> > > actually
> > > > > accepted a bet
> > > > > > BEFORE
> > > > > > > > > adding in conditions. His loophole &
> > > escape
> > > > > only made my
> > > > > > > publisher
> > > > > > > > > more willing to front-page the
> column.
> > > You
> > > > > lucked out--you
> > > > > hide
> > > > > > > > > between the covers!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all
> > > read.
> > > > > Fezzik said "I
> > > > > > > accept". You backed down.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Apparently you chose not to read where I
> > > said "I
> > > > > accept, and
> > > > > since
> > > > > > > you asked me to accept added
> stipulations
> > > here's
> > > > > mine". But
> > > > > that's
> > > > > > > OK. Why would you read that??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by
> > > > > demanding new terms
> > > > >
> > > > > Another case of your not being smart enough
> to
> > > read
> > > > > correctly. I
> > > > > proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to
> do,
> > > he
> > > > > accepted "with
> > > > > stipulations", I accepted "with one
> stipulation"
> > > and
> > > > > he ran, not
> > > > > thinking I would accept because he's like
> > > you--he
> > > > > could NEVER come up
> > > > > with even half that cash! And another clear
> > > victory
> > > > > for Singer over
> > > > > anybody!!
> > > > >
> > > > > > > It doesn't get any SIMPLER than that.
> Every
> > > > > reader
> > > > > > > > who posted on that forum agreed and
> every
> > > > > reader here who takes
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > time to read the exchange will come to
> the
> > > > > EXACT same
> > > > > conclusion.
> > > > > > > Of course, we've all seen you do the
> exact
> > > same
> > > > > thing here. Back
> > > > > > out
> > > > > > > of every bet. To make this even more
> > > humorous,
> > > > > you want us to
> > > > > read
> > > > > > > YOUR fantasized version of the bet
> instead
> > > of
> > > > > the EXACT exchange
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > led to your cowardly actions. I think
> it's
> > > > > pretty obvious why GT
> > > > > > > doesn't want you proposing any more
> bets.
> > > You
> > > > > are such a loser.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oops little dicky---you're 'caught
> again'!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can all see who has been "caught".
> Little
> > > > > Robbie, who claims to
> > > > > > have won so much, couldn't come up with
> the
> > > cash.
> > > > > How sweet it
> > > > > is ...
> > > > >
>
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

#14

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > You're such a clown, little dicky. When you stop holding
> hands
> > > with
> > > > > jimmy in order to build your confidence up, I'm sure

you'll

> > find
> > > > time
> > > > > to re-read the GT articles that clearly spell out how his
pal
> > > > Fezzik
> > > > > was running away as fast as he can with a whimper and a
> whine.
> > > Sort
> > > > > of like you always do---except he actually accepted a bet
> > BEFORE
> > > > > adding in conditions. His loophole & escape only made my
> > > publisher
> > > > > more willing to front-page the column. You lucked out--

you

> hide
> > > > > between the covers!
> > > >
> > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry, moron, but we can all read. Fezzik said "I
> > > accept". You backed down.
> > >
> > > Apparently you chose not to read where I said "I accept, and
> since
> > > you asked me to accept added stipulations here's mine". But
> that's
> > > OK. Why would you read that??
> >
> > He accepted YOUR terms. You backed down by demanding new terms
>
> Another case of your not being smart enough to read correctly. I
> proposed the bet exactly as he asked me to do, he accepted "with
> stipulations", I accepted "with one stipulation" and he ran, not
> thinking I would accept because he's like you--he could NEVER

come

up
> with even half that cash! And another clear victory for Singer

over

> anybody!!

Your idiotic "stipulations" had nothing to do with the actual bet.

Huh? You talking to yourself again?? He blabbed on the radio that my
results were a lie (sound familiar to a loser??) and the BET was
originally just for money. THEN he decided to add in certain
stipulations that had nothing to do with the bet so I added in one
that did. Then he gave a great big sigh of releif---kinda like you do
when you use one of your many escape clauses. Simpletons would
understand that.

> That is why it is so easy to tell you were backing down. You had a

bet that favored you by 4-1.

I did? Who says it was 4:1?? He said it's impossible for me to win a
session---just like YOU! That's 4:1? Which geek-math is that from?

> Oops again little dicky!! Did you read the part in my column

where I deposited $740,000--and verified by the publisher before
printing--at the Westin???

Sorry, I don't read your idiotic column.

Yet you chose to read the forum info that your hand-holding pal jimmy
put in here! Hmmmm....

Hmmmm. Let's see, you go borrow money, deposit it in bank, and

later pay back the loan.

HAHAHA!!! AHAHAHAHA!!! Please let me catch my breath after that
one!!! So a person who LOSES money gambling can waltz into a bank and
get a--what was it...$740,000!! LOAN!!?? And then "pay it back" after
the sure-thing loss I'd take because there's no way I was winning??
Nuff said.

Oh, and did I mention that your publisher has NO credibility

whatsoever. Anyone who would let a narcissistic, mentally ill con man
write a column for his paper is pretty much a loser by anyone's
definition.

That's the best part. The 'sweetest' part. And the 'frustrating' part
for bozos like you. What really irks you critics is of all the vp
writers and gurus, I'm the only one who sees thru AND EXPOSES all
their nonsense and baloney BS they dish out to unsuspecting
players....yet it's ME who has been the star of Gaming Today for over
5 years, and it's ME who was good enough with the truth to get
published by GBC---THE 2 most respected and tenured publication
houses in the gaming industry! God, what a beautiful world we all
live in....dontcha think?

> Gosh, golly gee little dicky......but I truly am sorry.
> Whadaya gonna say about them apples. As I said---you're such a
clown who's only reason for being here is to look stupid.

Them "apples" are a lie. Anything else?

Yup! Looksa like 'them apples' are still there!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#15

LMAO. Did I mention paranoid ("gang up on me"), delusional ("envy over
me") and narcissistic ("they discovered I was prepared for that") ...

We all read the forum, little man, and this is simply another one of
your typical NPD rants. No one ganged up on you. They simply gave their
honest opinions. You gotta love it ...

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

Um, I kinda think that went just a tad bit over your head! Since the
plan was for the Bobsie Twins to gang up on me from the start, when
they discovered I was prepared for that and they began to fall apart
in the booth like chopped liver, the word went out halfway thru not
to archive the show. Fezzik's 'Team Face-Savers' as you like to
call 'everybody in the place' had no choice but to come to his rescue
and call me names after their fiasco---and they are still so
enthralled with anger over that and envy over me that a few still do.
Isn't it great!

#16

>
> Um, I kinda think that went just a tad bit over your head! Since

the

> plan was for the Bobsie Twins to gang up on me from the start,

when

> they discovered I was prepared for that and they began to fall

apart

> in the booth like chopped liver, the word went out halfway thru

not

> to archive the show. Fezzik's 'Team Face-Savers' as you like to
> call 'everybody in the place' had no choice but to come to his

rescue

> and call me names after their fiasco---and they are still so
> enthralled with anger over that and envy over me that a few still

do.

> Isn't it great!

LMAO. Did I mention paranoid ("gang up on me"), delusional ("envy

over

me") and narcissistic ("they discovered I was prepared for

that") ...

We all read the forum, little man, and this is simply another one

of

your typical NPD rants. No one ganged up on you. They simply gave

their honest opinions. You gotta love it ...

HAHAHA!! Nearly the entire group pounded away, yet I made them look
like mincmeat mush by the time the ordeal was finished. Truth really
does prevail.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@> wrote:

#17

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > Um, I kinda think that went just a tad bit over your head!

Since

the
> > plan was for the Bobsie Twins to gang up on me from the start,
when
> > they discovered I was prepared for that and they began to fall
apart
> > in the booth like chopped liver, the word went out halfway thru
not
> > to archive the show. Fezzik's 'Team Face-Savers' as you like to
> > call 'everybody in the place' had no choice but to come to his
rescue
> > and call me names after their fiasco---and they are still so
> > enthralled with anger over that and envy over me that a few

still

do.
> > Isn't it great!

> LMAO. Did I mention paranoid ("gang up on me"), delusional ("envy
over
> me") and narcissistic ("they discovered I was prepared for
that") ...

> We all read the forum, little man, and this is simply another one
of
> your typical NPD rants. No one ganged up on you. They simply gave
their honest opinions. You gotta love it ...

HAHAHA!! Nearly the entire group pounded away, yet I made them look
like mincmeat mush by the time the ordeal was finished. Truth

really

does prevail.

Yes it does. You ran away like a scared rabbit. How sweet it is ...