That's not very nice (And moderator, what happened to our "be nice or
else" policy?). I converse with players of all denoms. The problem I
have is when people get a really valuable piece of information and
don't understand that sometimes sharing that information vastly
accelerates its fungibility. I don't mean to condescend, but maybe if
you were in my shoes, and knew what I knew, you'd see it more my way.
Harry's second thought was more in line. You'd be surprised who'd line
up for a 4% play at quarters (I was). That's $50 an hour with little
risk. A much, much better play than $1 FPDW with .5% cb, which is also
$50 an hour for most people.
Quarter players are in a different universe, and they really don't
affect the casino's bottom line. Well, not usually (LOL). Quarter
players who out plays at higher levels I have no use for, such as I
have no use for writers who sometimes don't realize their actual, as
opposed to intended audience.
What you say is true about a play being good if it only benefits me.
Well, almost. Hey, at least I'm in the group and not one of maybe
three dozen pros who cull this board looking for stuff they can burn
down personally. Maybe you should address your complaints to them.
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "jackessiebabe" <jackessiebabe@...> wrote:
Harry, most probably he meant exactly what he said. I believe a play
is only good to Paladin if it personally benefits HIM. Since I doubt
that he ever plays at the .25c denonm. (excepting possibly 100 play)
a 4% advantage at quarters would only cause the casino to be infested
with annoying fleas.
~B.
_______________________________________________________________________
paladingaming.net