You can disagree all you want with Chief, but he is 100% correct.
(100.33% if you include cash back.) Your post is completely
revisionist.
Although some came close, your posts were unmatched for vitriol,
invective, and vulgarity. They were the worst things I have read in 15
years of online activity. Your posts were the primary reason that
vpheaven was terminated. I know, because I pulled the plug.
In addition, I resent the fact that you used a variation of the vpheaven
name for your purposes, despite my request that you choose another. I
hope you have room for 2 badges, because I, too, find your actions
during that period contemptible.
icroyals
former vpheaven listowner
···
-----Original Message-----
From: Video Poker Vegas [mailto:vpve…@…net]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 1:12 PM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Should Rob Singer become a "moderated member"
of vpFREE?
Chief, I will have to disagree with you on this one. IMHO, you are the
one
practicing revisionist history. I gave Singer numerous outs and advised
him
that if he did not back off from his blatant lies and untruths, that I
would
expose the truth. He chose not to rescind his lies and actually
continued
to tell more. I'm not castigating him for investigating me, I am simply
reporting a fact. He did an outstanding job. I engaged in dialogue
with
Singer on the old vpheaven, on the same level he engaged me. I never
revealed any private matters concerning Singer, as that information came
from public records. I did not reveal his current address but did
narrow it
down to an apartment complex. He never public revealed the information
he
found about me on the advice of his attorney that I did not qualify as a
public figure. In fact, if he had revealed that information, it would
have
most likely added credibility to my revelations, not detracted from
them.
If I played a part in the demise of vpheaven, I played an even larger
part
in the resurrection of vp-heaven, which was up and running within an
hour.
In four months, vp-heaven has acquired more members than vpheaven. You
and
others are free to post on vp-heaven just as you did on vpheaven as
there
has been no change in moderation practices. As an added bonus, you will
be
reaching out to a larger membership. There was nothing revisionist
about my
original post and I can honestly say that I wear as a badge of honor the
fact that you hold me in contempt.
Rasti$Rulz
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vp-heaven
----- Original Message -----
From: <chiefvrwc2@aol.com>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:00 AM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Should Rob Singer become a "moderated member" of
vpFREE?
In a message dated 2/28/2003 10:22:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
vpvegas@charter.net writes:
> Rhonda, I am sorry to report that you should be concerned. Singer
went
> after me because I exposed him as a fraud on vpheaven. Singer
commissioned
> an investigation of me and found out details that I didn't even
know!
If nobody was ever a member of VPHeaven or had a memory that lasted
longer
than six months, this post might sound reasonable. But I was there and
for
YOU to castigate Singer after your outrageous conduct, that ultimately
caused
the end of VPHeaven, is beyond belief.
You continually foul mouthed and harangued Singer simply because you
disagreed with him. You outed his personal information including his
real
name, where he worked, where he lived, and his financial and private
affairs.
He never publicly reciprocated even though he had the goods on you.
Your
behavior was contemptible as is your attempt at revisionism.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=1705
065732:HM/A=1464858/R=0/*http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/cpm/grp/300_Cqu
o_1/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl>
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egrou
pmail/S=:HM/A=1464858/rand=836576415>
vpFREE Home Page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE
vpFREE Links:
http://www.lvcm.com/tomesims/VP/Links.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]