Serious negative effects of the Administrator's secret censorship.

[vpFREE3]

> The vpFREE Groups do not practice censorship, there aren't

any off-limit topics and no discussion thread has ever been
terminated.

Let's see ... you ban over 95% of the members from ever
seeing anything about your actions and you do not call that
censorship. LMAO.

If your mistakes are as you've stated on VPFree, due to
ineptitude, then you need to correct these mistakes ASAP.
This includes admitting your mistakes on VPFree and
apologizing to all concerned. Without this action then your
admitance of ineptitude was really just a lie. You really
didn't mean it. Dick

Your posts and private emails to me have convinced me that there
isn't any point in trying to discuss anything with you. They are often
illogical and inaccurate, and constantly attempt to confuse the issues
with extraneous diversions.

I'm not going to waste my time with someone who refuses to admit
an obvious, documented error and take responsibility for their actions.

I will not respond to any FREEvpFREE post(s) from you until/unless
you provide the proof that I requested about your Dancer assertion
or admit that you were wrong.

vpFREE Administrator

···

On 25 Nov 2005 at 1:08, rgmustain wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vpFREE Administrator
<vp_free@y...> wrote:

Your posts and private emails to me have convinced me that there
isn't any point in trying to discuss anything with you. They are

often

illogical and inaccurate, and constantly attempt to confuse the

issues

with extraneous diversions.

I'm not going to waste my time with someone who refuses to admit
an obvious, documented error and take responsibility for their

actions.

I will not respond to any FREEvpFREE post(s) from you until/unless
you provide the proof that I requested about your Dancer assertion
or admit that you were wrong.

vpFREE Administrator

This coming from the person who now refuses to answer direct
questions about the topic and after I provided absolutely conclusive
proof that I was right.

I guess this provides some insight into the new moderaters'
personality. This is clearly a person who will not admit their
mistakes. Interestingly, this person now reverts to claiming the
exact opposite is true. If this person really believed in their
position, do you think they would have stopped responding? Nope.

I'm beginning to think that ineptitude may really be the source of
this new administrators' problems. Unfortunately, he really doesn't
think this is the case and has only used this ploy (mentioning
ineptitude) to get sympathy from others. Disgusting.

Dick