Christ, Mickey! I'm not saying Scot does not provide valuable information!
I never said that I didn't like the information I am getting! And, yes,
this really is getting stupid!
Here is an example of one of my own personal experiences....
I went to Red Rock Station on the first day of a promotion I read about on
Scot's webpage. I happened to be in the are, but went to Red
Rock specifically because of the information published by Scot. When I got
there, no one in the casino had any information about the promotion. It was
just not happening. I even gave Scot's name to Red Rock, so they could look
for themselves.
I immediately emailed Scot and suggested that he correct the information on
his webpage. I could have kept the information to myself. But, I thought
the right thing to do was to tell Scot, so that he could update his webpage
and prevent others from being inconvenienced.
Scot never replied to me, nor did he change the information on his webpage.
It's logical to assume that others were inconvenienced. But, they probably
decided it was not important enough to mention it to Scot.
But, now, it seems like everyone has missed my point.
In my very first post on this subject, I said, "Now, I always double-check
with a casino before heading over there, if I am going just for something
that Mr. Krause has written."
What the hell is wrong with that?
And, why do I feel like I need to defend myself against you all?
Curtis
···
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 1:31 AM, mickeycrimm <mickeycrimm@yahoo.com> wrote:
If you don't like the information you are getting then go out and find your
own plays.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]