vpFREE2 Forums

Rookie Question

I apologize if I'm asking a stupid question...if I shouldn't be asking
here just let me know and / or redirect me?

I've been working with Dancer's VP for Winners software. For the most
part, I've been able to make sense of my errors. There is one that I
just cannot wrap my brain around, though.

Working with 9/6 Jacks, Intermediate, here is the hand:

7C JC AS 5C KD

I suggested holding Jack, Ace, King.

It claims major error, only to hold Jack of Clubs, King of Diamonds?

I can't wrap my brain around the reasoning. The EV for my hand was
reported to be 2.2803, for the Jack/King 2.4172. I don't see why
holding a Jack and King of different suits would be better than
holding a Jack, Ace, and King of different suits?

On a side note, I was practicing up to play at Harrah's in Vegas
coming up, but it sounds like they don't give any love to the 9/6
Jacks players?

I don't see why
holding a Jack and King of different suits would be better than
holding a Jack, Ace, and King of different suits?

Not a stupid question at all. You have to look at both of the P's. Possible
and probable. Naturally, with high cards the first thing you are looking for
is to pair, and push on the hand. Now if you look at possibles, holding all
three high cards, there is a zero possibility of drawing three runners and
hitting a quad, which is possible holding only two. Also zero possibility of
filling a full house. Holding two you can draw a boat. Holding the three
high cards, you can fill only one straight, the ace high. Holding the J and
K, you can fill two straights, K high and A high. I don't want two short
circuit your learning curve in one post, but you might need to bone up on
converting the possibles into probables by going to a website like
wizardofodds.com and noodling around in his various sections on probability.
You can see what your expected fill rates are on paying hands for holding
two and three high cards. I'm sure you will find something of interest at
his site.
                                                Nudge

···

From: "t4bz" <t4bz@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Rookie Question

t4bz

> I don't see why holding a Jack and King of different suits would be
> better than holding a Jack, Ace, and King of different suits?

nudge51 replied:

You have to look at both of the P's. Possible and probable.
Naturally, with high cards the first thing you are looking for
is to pair, and push on the hand. Now if you look at possibles,
holding all three high cards, there is a zero possibility of drawing
three runners and hitting a quad, which is possible holding only two.
Also zero possibility of filling a full house. Holding two you can
draw a boat. Holding the three high cards, you can fill only one
straight, the ace high. Holding the J and K, you can fill two
straights, K high and A high.

You have nailed the essence, nudge, but forgive me if I correct the
specifics. Short of taking a very close look at the math behind the
possible hand formations it's very difficult to cite what makes one
hold more favorable over another.

In this case, it's the greater potential for 2 Pair and 3 of a Kind on
the JK hold that make it the strongest. All other factor are lesser
in combination.

The unsuited JK hold has an EV of 2.4172 coins on a 5 coin bet. The
unsuited JKA EV is 2.2803. (Note: I've assumed the other cards in
the hand are smaller than 9 so as not to involve interference in
forming straights on the hold.) The contribution of each possible
hand to these EV's is as follows.

JK - HiPr: 1.52 2Pr: 0.44 3K: 0.26 S: 0.14 FH: 0.05 4K: 0.02
JKA- HiPr: 1.61 2Pr: 0.25 3K: 0.12 S: 0.30 FH: 0.00 4K: 0.00

diff HiPr: 0.09 2Pr: 0.19 3K: 0.14 S: (.16) FH: (.05) 4K: (.02)

As indicated, JK actually has a smaller probability of forming a
straight vs JKA. While the JK hold can form either a K-high or A-high
straight vs. just the A-hi of the JKA hold, because there are more
ways for the JK straight to "go wrong", it has a smaller chance of
completion. (I haven't looked at the numbers, but I expect JQ, with 3
possible formations may reverse this relationship.)

So, it's the 2Pr and 3K hold possibilities that are key to making the
JK hold stronger. (Note that HiPr adds a bit more, but not enough to
differentiate the two holds; similarly the reduced EV in the FH and 4K
are insufficient to be a distinction.)

···

------

I don't mean to hit anyone over the head with the details -- simply
illustrate that it's often the case that it takes a detailed
examination of the numbers to understand what makes a hold stronger.

These values come from WinPoker,using the "Analyze/Any Hand" feature,
which details the number of possible hand formations from any hold.

To arrive at the numbers I've detailed it's necessary to take these
values to a spreadsheet, divide each number of individual winning hand
possibiliities by the total number of hands that can be formed (to
arrive at a probability; each hold has a different number of total
hand formations, depending upon the number of cards held), and then
multiply by the respective payouts.

One interesting fact from the "Hand Details" summary is that holding
"J", "AK", and "AJ" are all stronger holds than "AJK". "J" is the
weakest of these 3; as you should expect, "AK" and "AJ" are equally
strong.

- Harry

Harry Porter wrote:

···

The contribution of each possible hand to these EV's is as follows.

JK - HiPr: 1.52 2Pr: 0.44 3K: 0.26 S: 0.14 FH: 0.05 4K: 0.02
JKA- HiPr: 1.61 2Pr: 0.25 3K: 0.12 S: 0.30 FH: 0.00 4K: 0.00

diff HiPr: 0.09 2Pr: 0.19 3K: 0.14 S: (.16) FH: (.05) 4K: (.02)

----------

Clearly some signs on the differences in hold EV's were reversed in
transcription:

The difference line should read:

diff HiPr: (.09) 2Pr: 0.19 3K: 0.14 S: (.16) FH: 0.05 4K: 0.02

The gist of all other statement is unchanged; the differences in the
2Pr and 3K are the key to what strengthens JK over JKA.

- H.

You guys are fantastic. Thanks for taking the time to explain it. It
makes sense (although my brain still struggles to keep up). I've aced
beginner level stuff but obviously I still have a way to go with
Intermediate / Advanced...my thoughts were to always hold as many faces
as possible...but I see why that isn't a universal rule. I really
appreciate the insight!

I have been to the Wizard site many times...I'll go back and poke
around a bit more.