I understand this point of view, and sympathize with those who feel
that the Rob Singer links are non and/or counter productive.
A lot of thought has gone into the Rob Singer situation, and how it
should be handled on vpFREE, and I'm relatively content with current
practices which were primarily motivated by free speech and fairness
considerations.
Hopefully the disclaimer statement that accompanies the links gives
adequate warning to unsuspecting newbies, and I recommend judicious
use of the delete key for the uninterested. I'm going to add a link to
the vpFREE Rob Singer Policy <http://tinyurl.com/aeec> to the
disclaimer.
FWIW, in a 2002 vpFREE poll only 32 of 171 voters disliked "having a
link to Rob Singer's GAMING TODAY columns in vpFREE"
I have a relatively open mind regarding content on vpFREE and welcome
suggestions for improvement. I'm posting this message and all of the
other messages in this thread on FREEvpFREE and request that any
further discussions take place there.
FREEvpFREE:
http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree
<a href="http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree">
http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/freevpfree</a>
vpFREE Administrator
···
On 22 Aug 2003 at 7:21, mkl54321 wrote:
Since this column actually offers no useful information whatsoever,
why post the link to it at all?