In a message dated 03/23/2005 11:37:13 A.M. Central Standard Time,
jackessiebabe@yahoo.com writes:
BTW, if you think that hookers
still cost .50 "a pop", you're a lot older than I've been led to
believe.
Babe,
Harry was referring to the cost of the protective garment worn during the
encounter, not the cost of the encounter......
We should stop this thread before someone gets hit with a bag of
quarters......
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
In a message dated 03/23/2005 11:37:13 A.M. Central Standard
Time,
jackessiebabe@y... writes:
BTW, if you think that hookers
still cost .50 "a pop", you're a lot older than I've been led to
believe.Babe,
Harry was referring to the cost of the protective garment worn
during the
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Opzop2wah@a... wrote:
encounter, not the cost of the encounter......
We should stop this thread before someone gets hit with a bag of
quarters......
====================================
Hi Dori,
Thanks for the translation. Harry emailed me the same thing,
privately. I should realize that I'm too far over the hill to
engage in sexual inneundo posting. And I DON'T want to hear one
word about inneundo!
This is IT, Tom. I promise.
Cheers,
Babe
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Looks like I started something here, but I think I made my point.
Shun them! If you have a free room there, take advantage of it and
play at the Palms or somewhere else. Let their 7/5 machines and
their boob pit be empty (I wish).
Victoria