vpFREE2 Forums

Refreshing information

#261

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> So, you don't even understand that tolerances are often given as
part of the specs. In orther words, you completely bluffing and now
> realize I know a LOT more about specs than do. And, I thought it
was 5 years ago ...

Hello McFly!! Tolerances are ALWAYS identified in aircraft specs.

Aircraft specs bozo not ALL specs. Did you see anywhere where I said
aircraft. You're still losing.

May I suggest if you know
anyone on this forum that you cut your losses before they write you
another personal message saying what a bafoon you are?

Sure, Princess. Dream on. Now, have you set up that appointment with
the shrink yet?

>
> ROTFLMAO.

What does that mean--you are tiring from typing?

Rolling on the floor laughing my ass off. You are so naive.

> > Deny my statement isn't included in 'efficient solution'.
>
> As soon as I get the tears out of my eyes from the last one ...
Whew, OK. I deny it. When word processors showed up the error rates
> initially INCREASED. Inexperience. It didn't get much better

until

> spell checkers showed up.

HaHaHa! Did you type your latest diet out on a word processor or a
typewriter? Which one made more sense and was EASIER? And may I
suggest a good cry now and then. It'll rid the body of all the salt
that's the second most cause of your skyrocketing high-blood

pressure

besides me!

Do you really think this reply is clever? It clearly shows you just
LOST this debate and are now trying to hide it behind another idiotic
rant. Well, Princess, you've done this so many times now its' become
completely transparent. Nobody buy its.

I suspect this also means you take medication for high blood pressure.

>
> > > You want me to send you $300,000?
> >
> > Yup. You got the money honey?

Answer the question and stop trying to make yourself feel better

when

you have little or no response AGAIN.

I see you're now editing out my responses. This is a cowards'
approach (what a surprise). Still won't work, Princess. Your
transparency is showing again so you'd better keep the panties on.
Once again, here's my answer.

The Princess of Cowards has reneged on her offer and won't even admit
it. Let me explain how it works so you can sniffle some more. You
put a challenge on the table--10000:1 that I wouldn't show up at Sams
Town to meet you--I accepted your challenge (for $60). Now, you can
either honor that challenge or pull it from the table(renege), So,
Princess, which is it? Agree or tell everyone your reneging.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#262

It's funny how things happen. In the middle of a one-sided chat as

I

attempt to get through to self-confirmed Ad-Dick, I experienced yet
another incident that will only eat further away at poor Ricky's
nerves. And that ain't good at his age. But he asks for it, and he
continually takes it from behind on every issue. I guess, besides a
brutally tiring round of golf on the one good day a week up there,
that's how he gets his 'workout'.

A newsletter member from my site who is on his way to LV from Rhode
Island made a stopover today so he could learn more of my standard
Romp Thru Town Play Strategy. I met him at the local Injun casino
(Casino Arizona at Talking Stick) where he was prepared to play 100
credits each on 25c/50c/$1/$2--cashing out every time he got $10
ahead minimum, and doing it a total of 3 times. The machines at the
bar all have only 7/5 JB with a sequential RF bonus of 50,000 on
25c/50c/$1, and 6/5 BP with the sequential bonus. I know these are
games Dicky at least SAYS he will stay away from at all costs,
because 'it's impossible to win on them', but since I only train

and

never play professionally at ANY Indian place, Randall was prepared
to do it with his money.

The 1st session ended on 50c and an overall profit of $12.50. The
next one ended at $2 with a SF in diamonds (7-J) for a profit of
$235. The last one ended at $2 again with four Aces for a profit of
$695. Dick, please add that up on your slide rule. Never mind--too
slow. It's +$942.50. And guess what? This guy has never played BP

in

his life, and has not seen four natural Aces on his precious FPDW

at

Sunset Station for as long as he can remember.

So let's see, if he wanted to play the addict way of nothing but

one

denomination - on and on with no goals, rhyme or reason - even

after

those four Aces he'd be stuck $48. Now doesn't that just turn you

on?

Naturally, the geek will say "but gee Rob, please play fair
here!" "If Randall were playing a POSITIVE game like FPDW, there's

a

whole bunch of math models and probability theories by Bilbo Jazbo,
Reid my lips, and MYSELF that say he might possibly could have
probably won something, and at least enough that when he continued
playing on and on like a moronic math geek, he might possible could
probably have had enough credits left to hit a royal."

Now you see even more clearly after today's event why I win and

those

neurotics do not.

Went to the casino tonight. Third time trying Rob's strategy (flat
earth). Started on 25c . A few cash outs but nothing great. moved up
to 50c. Same thing some cash outs but nothing big. Moved up to the
$1.00 and caught quad Aces on BP. Back to 25c. Again not really
catching anything but I couldn't run out the credits. Called it quits
and came home with a profit of $250. Not bad for 5 hours. I can't
play any longer than that. It gets tedious at times plus the casino
is a 90 minute drive from home. After 3 sessions a net profit of
$2300 fror 14 hours of VP. All of this on horrible machines at a
Indian casino.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#263

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

After the 50,000,000 hands (actuallymuch fewer) the results

average

out and the luck factor isoverwhelmed by the influence of
consistently playing skillfully. Irealize these FACTs are way above
your intellect and I don't expect areasonable reply from you even
though this is just the application ofstatistics 101."
>
You see what a dope you turn into when cornered?

Sure, Princess. No good response? That's what happens when you argue
against the FACTS.

All you can go back
on and say AGAIN is "but gee Rob, if you add them all up, it at

some

unknown time turns into skill".
In other words, you know I'm right
and you have no answer for me,

Can I hear you say the earth is flat one more time? You must need a
concrete example that a dimwit like yourself might understand ...

Does gravity work for you? Or, do you float around in some vaporous
state? The reason you feel the effect of gravity is EXACTLY the same
reason that skill overwhelms luck. Gravity overwhelms all the other
forces. This is a fact of nature as surely as skill prevails at VP.
They are the same principle.

> >
> > Put the doughnut down and do some thinking instead of eating

for

a change.
>
> Princess, there's that projected self loathing again. You'd

better

> set up another appointment with a shrink. This time find one that
can help you out.

I guess you didn't like that one bit. Maybe I'll send you a $15

gift

certificate to Krispy Kreme so you can have a way to work off your
anguish.

Sure you will, Princess of Cowards ... Like meeting me at Sams
Town ... you better save the money for that next case of rot gut. Or,
better yet, for your next visit to the shrink.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#264

Went to the casino tonight. Third time trying Rob's strategy (flat
earth). Started on 25c . A few cash outs but nothing great. moved

up

to 50c. Same thing some cash outs but nothing big. Moved up to the
$1.00 and caught quad Aces on BP. Back to 25c. Again not really
catching anything but I couldn't run out the credits. Called it

quits

and came home with a profit of $250. Not bad for 5 hours. I can't
play any longer than that. It gets tedious at times plus the casino
is a 90 minute drive from home. After 3 sessions a net profit of
$2300 fror 14 hours of VP. All of this on horrible machines at a
Indian casino.

This is done a thousand times a day all over the country by gamblers
playing absolutely no system. Your point?

Do you really think a couple of winning sessions means something?
Didn't you check out Eds' simulation posts where he had several wins
before he hit the big loss?

Did you ever consider doing some simulations first?

Dick

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "tomghysel" <tomghysel@y...> wrote:

#265

> It's childish to say "No I didn't!" when you did.

No, it's simply the truth, Princess. Something you know nothing

about.

Waawaawaa.

>
> Golf! HA! I should have guessed. A lazy man's game if there ever
was
> one. I'm glad you're old enough to play. I guess it didn't snow

up

> there today.

It was 100 below with a 70 mph wind, and, I had to trudge through 6
feet of snow. Especially difficult on those long par 5s. If that
wasn't bad enough a pack of hungry wolves came after me and I had

to fight them off with my bare hands. It did make for a nice wolf
stew tonight. Just another lazy day ...

They must have saw one heck of a meal!

Your name, absolutely no value. You continuing to be a coward ...
priceless.

So your point in asking?

>
> >And, my wife is more of a gambler than I am.
>
> You mean your wife has a bigger butt than YOU do? And how many
packs do you healthy specimens go through a day?

No and zero.

Of course not.

How many gallons of booze do you go through? Wait, I

forget, it's a progression so your last 20 drinks only count as 4.

Gee McFly. They don't sell it by the gallon like the redsticks can
get in Minnesota off of the losers up there.....

Never will, Princess. Unless of course, you plan to write about how
you reneged on the bet you offered me.

Looks like you don't have the cash. Ha!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#266

Aircraft specs bozo not ALL specs. Did you see anywhere where I

said aircraft. You're still losing.

Do you remember we were discussing the B2 bomber? Hello???

> > ROTFLMAO.
>
> What does that mean--you are tiring from typing?

Rolling on the floor laughing my ass off. You are so naive.

Then why not say that? What's with the lazy abbreviations? Gramps got
the cramps?

> HaHaHa! Did you type your latest diet out on a word processor or

a typewriter? Which one made more sense and was EASIER? And may I

> suggest a good cry now and then. It'll rid the body of all the

salt that's the second most cause of your skyrocketing high-blood

pressure besides me!

Do you really think this reply is clever? It clearly shows you just
LOST this debate and are now trying to hide it behind another

idiotic rant. Well, Princess, you've done this so many times now its'
become completely transparent. Nobody buy its.

The winner gets to the other guy. Let's see.... Who might that be.

I see you're now editing out my responses. This is a cowards'
approach (what a surprise). Still won't work, Princess. Your
transparency is showing again so you'd better keep the panties on.
Once again, here's my answer.

This seems like your typical lack-of-knowledge response.

One more time: Do as I say on the bet. You are the weak computer
fairy here, and as a professional I direct you to comply. Failure to
agree to MY terms will further confirm you are a true hack who has
little to live for in life but disruption.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#267

Went to the casino tonight. Third time trying Rob's strategy (flat
earth). Started on 25c . A few cash outs but nothing great. moved

up to 50c. Same thing some cash outs but nothing big. Moved up to the

$1.00 and caught quad Aces on BP. Back to 25c. Again not really
catching anything but I couldn't run out the credits. Called it

quits and came home with a profit of $250. Not bad for 5 hours. I
can'tplay any longer than that. It gets tedious at times plus the
casino is a 90 minute drive from home. After 3 sessions a net profit
of $2300 fror 14 hours of VP. All of this on horrible machines at a

Indian casino.

Imagine all the bottles of Geritol Dick could get with just a small
percentage of that!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "tomghysel" <tomghysel@y...> wrote:

#268

> All you can go back on and say AGAIN is "but gee Rob, if you add

them all up, it at some unknown time turns into skill".

In other words, you know I'm right and you have no answer for me,

Can I hear you say the earth is flat one more time? You must need a
concrete example that a dimwit like yourself might understand ...

That's some answer from a self-proclaimed scholar.

Does gravity work for you? Or, do you float around in some vaporous
state? The reason you feel the effect of gravity is EXACTLY the

same reason that skill overwhelms luck. Gravity overwhelms all the
other forces. This is a fact of nature as surely as skill prevails at
VP. They are the same principle.

Is it past your bedtime and are you caught up in some sort of dream
right now? Gravity and video poker? Are you kidding or what? Go ahead
and bring that up at the next Skip Hughes meeting and watch even
Skippy laugh until he buckles over.

> I guess you didn't like that one bit. Maybe I'll send you a $15
gift certificate to Krispy Kreme so you can have a way to work off

your anguish.

Sure you will, Princess of Cowards ... Like meeting me at Sams
Town ... you better save the money for that next case of rot gut.

Or, better yet, for your next visit to the shrink.

I don't believe ST has a Krispy Kreme, but Sunset Station does. How
about there? Two stipulations: You have to come back after I return
from Hawaii (if you have any money left after your "2 hours" of play
on FPDW; and send me the $300k per my instructions. Anything else
constitutes a clucky chicken.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#269

This is done a thousand times a day all over the country by

gamblers playing absolutely no system. Your point?

Your a thousand laughs. You know this for a fact? All you offered is
a bunch of sour grapes here because you can't figure it out.

Do you really think a couple of winning sessions means something?

I do. It means the player didn't lose TODAY, Bozo. Just like all you
expert-play fools want to do only do it maybe 30% of the time.

Didn't you check out Eds' simulation posts where he had several

wins before he hit the big loss?Did you ever consider doing some
simulations first?

Oh my God, he's back to that nonsense again when he has no
answers.....

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#270

This is done a thousand times a day all over the country by

gamblers

playing absolutely no system. Your point?

Do you really think a couple of winning sessions means something?
Didn't you check out Eds' simulation posts where he had several

wins

before he hit the big loss?

Did you ever consider doing some simulations first?

Dick

I did simulations on both FrugalVP and Winpoker. After 50 sessions on
both simulators I had about a 90 percent win ratio. Now I imagine
that someone who uses the evolution strategy for VP where everything
is possible if we throw a billion years/hands into the equation 50
sessions is not enough.
I go to the casino with one intention, win money. I'm not there to
get gold stars on my forehead for perfect play or to get my picture
in VP weekly for lowest loss ratio per session.
I play multi-game machines. I have all the paytables of the games at
the casino on both FVP and Winpoker. Through practice I can play
perfect strategy on every game on the machine except JW, which I hate
anyways.
I never stay on the same game if it's not paying. Even before reading
Rob's strategy I would start with the least volatile and move up
until I would find something in the mood to pay. Sometimes this means
moving from machine to machine.
As I stated in an earlier post I would stray from perfect play at
times. I have broken full houses with 3-3s and 3-Aces in DDB I know
that would probably make you go limp even with an overdose of Viagra
in your system. If your gambling sometimes you have to gamble.
As for this mythical "BIG LOSS" crap you constantly bring up. Big
losses are the byproduct of big losers. I never take more than $700
with me to gamble and I never play more than 4-5 hours. Since April I
have had over $9000 in hand payouts alone and have never, I repeat
never walked out of the casino without stopping at the cashier to
cash out my vouchers. I also recieve free tickets to every concert
from has been groups that Seneca can ressurect from the dead. I have
2 tickets for the Beach Boys on Labor day if you would like them.
Listening to old men sing "Help me Rhonda with my Rogaine" is not my
idea of how to spend Labor day.
With Rob's system I now willing take and run $100 through 25c, $200
through 50c and $400 through $1.00. If I decide I don't want ot risk
$400 at the dollar level I can cut and run. Even with no cashouts I'm
only at a $300 loss. While not good it's not this "Huge Loss" that's
going to put my house in foreclosure.
One last thing. I try not to get into name calling and personal
attacks but I'm beginning to resent your smug, condescending replies.
I would assume from your attempt at humor at the expense of President
Bush that you're a Minnesota Liberal. Nothing personal but I consider
liberals to be the after birth of a dead ideology and try not to get
into any meaningfull discussion with them so if I don't respond to
your post you know why. Sometimes it's just more productive to try
and get Jello to stick to the ceiling
Sorry for any spelling or punctuation errors but it is 3AM here on
the east coast and I'm ready for bed.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#271

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> This is done a thousand times a day all over the country by
gamblers
> playing absolutely no system. Your point?
>
> Do you really think a couple of winning sessions means something?
> Didn't you check out Eds' simulation posts where he had several
wins
> before he hit the big loss?
>
> Did you ever consider doing some simulations first?
>
> Dick

I did simulations on both FrugalVP and Winpoker. After 50 sessions

on

both simulators I had about a 90 percent win ratio. Now I imagine
that someone who uses the evolution strategy for VP where

everything

is possible if we throw a billion years/hands into the equation 50
sessions is not enough.
I go to the casino with one intention, win money. I'm not there to
get gold stars on my forehead for perfect play or to get my picture
in VP weekly for lowest loss ratio per session.
I play multi-game machines. I have all the paytables of the games

at

the casino on both FVP and Winpoker. Through practice I can play
perfect strategy on every game on the machine except JW, which I

hate

anyways.
I never stay on the same game if it's not paying. Even before

reading

Rob's strategy I would start with the least volatile and move up
until I would find something in the mood to pay. Sometimes this

means

moving from machine to machine.
As I stated in an earlier post I would stray from perfect play at
times. I have broken full houses with 3-3s and 3-Aces in DDB I know
that would probably make you go limp even with an overdose of

Viagra

in your system. If your gambling sometimes you have to gamble.
As for this mythical "BIG LOSS" crap you constantly bring up. Big
losses are the byproduct of big losers. I never take more than $700
with me to gamble and I never play more than 4-5 hours. Since April

I

have had over $9000 in hand payouts alone and have never, I repeat
never walked out of the casino without stopping at the cashier to
cash out my vouchers. I also recieve free tickets to every concert
from has been groups that Seneca can ressurect from the dead. I

have

2 tickets for the Beach Boys on Labor day if you would like them.
Listening to old men sing "Help me Rhonda with my Rogaine" is not

my

idea of how to spend Labor day.
With Rob's system I now willing take and run $100 through 25c, $200
through 50c and $400 through $1.00. If I decide I don't want ot

risk

$400 at the dollar level I can cut and run. Even with no cashouts

I'm

only at a $300 loss. While not good it's not this "Huge Loss"

that's

going to put my house in foreclosure.
One last thing. I try not to get into name calling and personal
attacks but I'm beginning to resent your smug, condescending

replies.

I would assume from your attempt at humor at the expense of

President

Bush that you're a Minnesota Liberal. Nothing personal but I

consider

liberals to be the after birth of a dead ideology and try not to

get

into any meaningfull discussion with them so if I don't respond to
your post you know why. Sometimes it's just more productive to try
and get Jello to stick to the ceiling
Sorry for any spelling or punctuation errors but it is 3AM here on
the east coast and I'm ready for bed.

Of course, Princess ... How many separate Ids is this now?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "tomghysel" <tomghysel@y...> wrote:

#272

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> This is done a thousand times a day all over the country by
gamblers playing absolutely no system. Your point?

Your a thousand laughs. You know this for a fact? All you offered

is

a bunch of sour grapes here because you can't figure it out.
>
> Do you really think a couple of winning sessions means something?

I do. It means the player didn't lose TODAY, Bozo. Just like all

you

expert-play fools want to do only do it maybe 30% of the time.

> Didn't you check out Eds' simulation posts where he had several
wins before he hit the big loss?Did you ever consider doing some
simulations first?

Oh my God, he's back to that nonsense again when he has no
answers.....

Responding to your own posts again? I think your internet addiction
may be starting to outweigh your gambling addication.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#273

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Your name, absolutely no value. You continuing to be a coward ...
> priceless.

So your point in asking?

Just to see if you'd changed your cowardly ways, Princess. But no,
you haven't, instead you've started using more false names making you
the coward of all cowards.

>
> >
> > >And, my wife is more of a gambler than I am.
> >
> > You mean your wife has a bigger butt than YOU do? And how many
> packs do you healthy specimens go through a day?
>
> No and zero.

Of course not.

I get it. The reason for your projected self loathing regarding the
word "fat". Either you were obese in your younger days, your wife is
obese or you've been called a fathead all your life. Which is it,
Princess?

> Never will, Princess. Unless of course, you plan to write about

how

> you reneged on the bet you offered me.

Looks like you don't have the cash. Ha!

I'm still waiting for you to "officially" pull your first offer off
table (renege), Princess. At that time I will consider any other
offer you make. Not before. So, what is it? Is the ORIGINAL bet still
on or are you shrinking back into that yellow hole again?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#274

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Aircraft specs bozo not ALL specs. Did you see anywhere where I
said aircraft. You're still losing.

Do you remember we were discussing the B2 bomber? Hello???

In my reply I used the term "specs" in a more general sense. However,
I'm the one who brought up tolerances. You're the one that had no
idea what they were.

>
> > > ROTFLMAO.
> >
> > What does that mean--you are tiring from typing?
>
> Rolling on the floor laughing my ass off. You are so naive.

Then why not say that? What's with the lazy abbreviations? Gramps

got

the cramps?

This is one of the most COMMON internet acronyms around. I used it
because everyone (but you) knows exactly what it means and they are
getting just as good a laugh as I am right now.

>
> I see you're now editing out my responses. This is a cowards'
> approach (what a surprise). Still won't work, Princess. Your
> transparency is showing again so you'd better keep the panties

on.

> Once again, here's my answer.

This seems like your typical lack-of-knowledge response.

Just calling you out, Princess. Showing, once again, what a coward
you are.

>
One more time: Do as I say on the bet. You are the weak computer
fairy here, and as a professional I direct you to comply. Failure

to

agree to MY terms will further confirm you are a true hack who has
little to live for in life but disruption.

I now see that you couldn't compete with the computer programmers in
your organization. You must have hated that quite a bit. Now, with
projected self loathing running your life, you strike back like a
grade school cry baby. You are so transparent.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#275

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > All you can go back on and say AGAIN is "but gee Rob, if you

add

them all up, it at some unknown time turns into skill".
> In other words, you know I'm right and you have no answer for me,
>
> Can I hear you say the earth is flat one more time? You must need

a

> concrete example that a dimwit like yourself might understand ...

That's some answer from a self-proclaimed scholar.
>
> Does gravity work for you? Or, do you float around in some

vaporous

> state? The reason you feel the effect of gravity is EXACTLY the
same reason that skill overwhelms luck. Gravity overwhelms all the
other forces. This is a fact of nature as surely as skill prevails

at

VP. They are the same principle.

Is it past your bedtime and are you caught up in some sort of dream
right now? Gravity and video poker? Are you kidding or what?

Nope. Like I said, same principle. Do you even understand the simple
forces of nature? Do you know what a principle is? Do you really want
to show everyone how stupid you are? Oh, wait, of course you do, you
do it all the taime.

>
> > I guess you didn't like that one bit. Maybe I'll send you a $15
> gift certificate to Krispy Kreme so you can have a way to work

off

your anguish.
>
> Sure you will, Princess of Cowards ... Like meeting me at Sams
> Town ... you better save the money for that next case of rot gut.
Or, better yet, for your next visit to the shrink.

I don't believe ST has a Krispy Kreme, but Sunset Station does. How
about there? Two stipulations: You have to come back after I return
from Hawaii (if you have any money left after your "2 hours" of

play

on FPDW; and send me the $300k per my instructions. Anything else
constitutes a clucky chicken.

When you pull your first challenge off the table. Not before.

If you were man enough (what a joke) to take responsibility for your
first offer then and only then will I consider your next offer. The
Princess of cowards thinks that this attempt to confuse the issue
will help her get out out of the first challenge. Won't happen.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#276

You that paranoid?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

Of course, Princess ... How many separate Ids is this now?

#277

> > Do you really think a couple of winning sessions means

something?

>
> I do. It means the player didn't lose TODAY, Bozo. Just like all
you expert-play fools want to do only do it maybe 30% of the time.
>
> > Didn't you check out Eds' simulation posts where he had several
> wins before he hit the big loss?Did you ever consider doing some
> simulations first?
>
> Oh my God, he's back to that nonsense again when he has no
> answers.....

Responding to your own posts again? I think your internet addiction
may be starting to outweigh your gambling addication.

I wonder....How does that compare to a FOOD addiction?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#278

Just to see if you'd changed your cowardly ways, Princess. But no,
you haven't, instead you've started using more false names making

you the coward of all cowards.

Still paranoid, and still showing signs that you have no clue how to
check out a sender's address location? What kind of computer fairy
WERE you anyway?

I get it. The reason for your projected self loathing regarding the
word "fat". Either you were obese in your younger days, your wife

is obese or you've been called a fathead all your life. Which is it,

Princess?

Nope, I enjoy calling a spade a spade. One of the absolute
requirements of being a successful and consistent winner at gambling
is self-respect and self-confidence. You don't have these then you
can expect to lose due to lack of discipline & determination. Fat
butts don't qualify, as don't smokers and heavy drinkers.

> Looks like you don't have the cash. Ha! Come back when you do,

and stop making excuses.
.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#279

> Do you remember we were discussing the B2 bomber? Hello???

In my reply I used the term "specs" in a more general sense.

However, I'm the one who brought up tolerances. You're the one that
had no idea what they were.

There's that famous Tricky Dicky whining again when you start to
wander. Alzheimer's maybe?

> Then why not say that? What's with the lazy abbreviations? Gramps
got the cramps?

This is one of the most COMMON internet acronyms around. I used it
because everyone (but you) knows exactly what it means and they are
getting just as good a laugh as I am right now.

Well I don't use it because I'm not as lazy as you. What it really is
is a geek phrase some nerd conjured up typing a spreadsheet out with
one hand while his other hand was 'busy'.

> One more time: Do as I say on the bet. And please stop that

crying. We all have superiors who ridicule us. Get over it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#280

> > > All you can go back on and say AGAIN is "but gee Rob, if you
add them all up, it at some unknown time turns into skill".

> In other words, you know I'm right and you have no answer for me.

> >
> Is it past your bedtime and are you caught up in some sort of

dream right now? Gravity and video poker? Are you kidding or what?

Nope. Like I said, same principle. Do you even understand the

simple forces of nature? Do you know what a principle is? Do you
really want to show everyone how stupid you are? Oh, wait, of course
you do, you do it all the taime.

That's all great and dandy, but what about Skippy hughes laughing his
big butt off at you?

> I don't believe ST has a Krispy Kreme, but Sunset Station does.

How about there? Two stipulations: You have to come back after I
return from Hawaii (if you have any money left after your "2 hours"
of play on FPDW); and, send me the $300k per my instructions.
Anything else constitutes a clucky chicken.

When you pull your first challenge off the table. Not before.

That fits the 'clucky chicken' scenario, does it not? Just do what
you've done all your life--what you're told to do, and you'll be
fine.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote: