I'm going to avoid the semantic responses against NOTI & just say that at
one time husband & and wife were permitted to be on the same account using the
same card (referring to casinos in general). Then one day it changed so that
we had to have separate cards.
A lot of people advised having separate cards anyway so that you could get
multiple offers thus leveraging the benefits of the promotion. This would be
good if you both gambled but worked against you if only one gambled as in my
case. So whenever my wife goes on a trip without me, it causes a problem when
the casino restricts comp usage to the actual card holder since she cannot
access my comps. That's why I miss the old days. Fortunately, many casinos don't
have this restriction or don't enforce it & whenever I mention it most have
volunteered to work around it. I'm sure the work-around is due to consistent
play & because I ask infrequently.
I've always wondered why the change? The reason I was given was because it's
the law. However, I think the real reason is to generate more play. Yes,
there might be a law but what are they protecting against especially if they
have the consent of both spouses?
**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel
deal here.
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]