In a message dated 5/16/2003 11:07:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,
vpFREE@yahoogroups.com writes:
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 06:42:36 -0000
From: "missdeuces" <MissDeuces@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Re Bob Dancer &NGCWhile I agree with the theory that he was wrong, what would be the
point of going to NGC over something that happend 5,6,7 years ago? I
don't remember reading that he actually ever asked for scratchers
that he should not get (perhaps I missed that) - I think he found a
situation that he took advantage of. A little charm, a little larger
tip than normal. I have read alot of people voice their theories
and thoughts and outrage about this and it makes me wonder if there
might be a bit of jealousy that he got away with it. Again I don't
think it is right and if I saw it happening today I probably would
bring it to the attention of the casino execs but that is me.
There's no point & I wasn't seriously trying to suggest it.
The point is, could such action be taken if it were to happen in the future?
Also this type of greed does hurt other players. Promotions end sooner,
paytables are brought down. As usual, others end up paying for the actions of
a few.
When it's phrased that we may be jealous that he got away with it, there's an
implication that it's all right as long as you don't get caught. If most of
us think like this then society is in sad shape when our only moral
restrictions are determined by whether or not we will be caught with our hand
in the cookie jar.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]