Dancer's implicit quid pro quos and pay-offs are exactly what politicians and
campaign contributors have been doing for years. Why doesn't Dancer get
respectable and move to DC and the big time?
On second thought, he might reasonably consider that proposal as a moral
devolution from his VP hustling!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sort of sounds like he is not on your favorite people list.
On Fri, 16 May 2003 12:30:01 EDT, you wrote:
Dancer's implicit quid pro quos and pay-offs are exactly what politicians and
campaign contributors have been doing for years. Why doesn't Dancer get
respectable and move to DC and the big time?On second thought, he might reasonably consider that proposal as a moral
devolution from his VP hustling![Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/a7ga
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/