cadreaming01 wrote:
I am assuming "RC" as used in this context is an abbreviation
for "Reward Credit" which is a unit of measure for Harrah's Total
Rewards program.
Yes, that's clear now. Thanks.
BTW, I enjoyed your position on "productive" job's
and your ideology on paying to play versus playing to earn. Sometimes in acvpp and particularly in vpfree, I think folks forget
it is a GAME.
Thanks. Sometimes I know I must seem pretty anal and a real cheap skate when I write about alternative strategies to save a fraction of a percent, but that's just my curiosity and interest in math, more than anything else. Frankly, I've spent a LOT of time working on my own strategy cards and perfecting my play, and I'm not about to change everything and also sacrifice a bit of ER ... just so I can add a last-breath game or two to my session based on RoR statistics or whatever -- especially not when I waste even more than that by carelessness while drinking and playing JoB-8/5 at the bar (in my previous post I said 8/6 by mistake).
Alas, I have received the bad news that my favorite casino (Hollywood in Tunica) has cut the number of JoB-9/6 machines in half, and that they might have also reduced cashback. I'll be there next week to find out for certain. I might have to go back to concentrating on brewing beer for my primary recreation
Naaaaah, I'll keep playing, but I might be compelled to return to short-coin ... GASP. Hey, if it's definitely a negative game anyway ... even with cashback and bounceback ... then it doesn't make good sense to play full-coin; the sacrifice in ER while playing SC vs. FC is _more_ than offset by the savings in reducing the amount of coin-in on a negative game. Just do the math. And I can still have fun. Comps will be harder to come by, but we mostly go on day trips, and if we can't earn buffets, we can pay for them with the money we save on our coin-in. It _IS_, afterall, just a game to us, too, and I think many hobbies cost just as much or more.
Cheers.
Bill Velek