Actually, I didn't write that, it was somebody responding to my post (you mis-snipped :). In fact, I agree with you, it's not cheating. The poster should've said it makes the game more vulnerable to being beaten by someone who could detect patterns in the RNG sequence.
In fact, I seem to remember seeing a TV program about a former Nevada Gaming employee who tested machines and was indicted for using the knowledge he gained to predict RNG sequences. He claimed that the pattern was fairly easy to spot. Perhaps someone can fill in the details (his name, facts of the case, etc).
Countgr8@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 5/17/2006 2:58:57 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
john.douglass@yahoo.com writes:
Furthermore, if the RNG were only to be run once per time the game needed a
random number, it would make any unintentional patterns in the RNG alot more
obvious to someone seeking out such patterns, thus making the game vulnerable to cheating.
Using ones brain to figure something out is not cheating.
···
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]