--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > Funny, isn't it YOU who ask for their names and addresses so
you
> can contact them to verify?? Now take the foot out of the mouth
and
> > repeat after me: Rob is a God to me.
>
> You still haven't provided anything useful to identify YOUR
> mathematicians. The ones YOU claim validated YOUR system.
....And the ones YOU are seeking out to satisfy YOUR itch about me.
Hmmm. I just said I don't care to contact them. All I want is you to
verify they exist. If you can't provide this simplest task then there
is ABSOLUTELY no doubt they do not exist, and, you lied about them
and everything else.
> And, once again, I never said I wanted their names to verify your
> system. I'm more than happy just proving you lied about them all
> along. That should be enough to convince anyone that you are not
to
> be trusted.
A corny statement like that isn't going to help your cause. Now
you're saying you don't want it to be that they did what I said,
Nope. I just said all I want is for you to prove they exist. Simple
as can be. We all know they don't exist, but I will keep pushing you
until you admit it for all to see.
and
there's no way you'll ever accept that they did even if I had them
visit you at home.
All I need is the simplest verification. They are more then welcome
to visit my home if you think that will do it. LMAO.
At that point you'd claim these aren't the guys,
and if they proved they know me you'd peel down the onion even
further and say "oh, well, they exist, but they didn't do anything
for me". It would just keep snowballing until you couldn't put your
feet any further into your mouth. It's what you call the Angry Old
Man Syndrome.
Your obvious attempt to evade the issue does nothing for you. Either
prove they exist or admit you lied.
> Not my problem. Either you provide direct evidence of their
existence or we can all assume they don't exist, never did exist
and
you lied about them all this time.
You're forgetting....You're the one with a hair on your butt about
me, and you're the one asking the questions.
I didn't forget a thing. You made a claim and now it's time to either
back it up or admit you lied.
> I know enough to have proven you a liar and a fraud. I know
that's
> not much, but it's enough for me.
Well of course. Everything HAS to be theoretically OK inside your
mind, just as it does when you continually have to justify how you
both HAVE to go to casinos every day to satisfy the fix. Sick minds
can justify anything anytime they like. It's the rest of us who get
entertainment out of watching people like you squirm & suffer for
being involved in such a struggle.
A lot of words. Absolutely no content. If you'd take just 1 minute
and admit you lied about the mathematicians then you wouldn't have to
look so silly.
> > Nope, and that's both your inexperience with anything outside
of
> > casino doors showing itself again, as well as a glaring need
not
to
> > want to check on anything. If you knew Raytheon, you'd know
their
> > Asian overseas e-mail addresses mostly have the country
designator
> > before the .com
>
> Lie. I googled them and everywhere I looked it came after
the .com.
> You are such a bozo.
Hello McFly again!! Whatever your googling, punch it in 9 years ago
and try again. What's to expect from someone like you who's never
seen the outside of a smokey casino. Even though other things in
this
world change, a bazooka like you would expect time to have stod
still
because you've had nothing important happen for 9 years. Get outta
the casinos once in a while. There's a whole world of new things
going on around you. but wait! I know....All you care about is when
the next new video poker game's coming out. Pathetic, isn't it?
More words, still no content. Admit you lied, monkey boy, it will be
much easier than continuing to look like a complete moron.
> > Yes I do. I LOVE to read how you play so often and blame your
wife
> > for destroying your life. Your words don't say it, but even
then
> you
> > show anguish at the inordinate amount of time you're habit has
> > punished you into staying at the machines. You are always in my
> > prayers.
>
> LMAO. Not another ridiculous attempt to deflect the discussion
away
> from your worthless system??? How many times is this now?
However,
> it is nice to see you want to know so much about lil ole me.
If you read carefully, I'm not asking questions about you. I'm
posting the obvious truth about lil ole you.
You know absolutely nothing about me. You go through this same
diatribe with EVERYONE who challenges you. You can't even come up
with anything remotely new or clever. This is just another example of
your iditiotic mental state that tries to generalize everyone into
one fixed description. It really makes YOU look like a fool.
And read the subject up
above. Do you see anything about my play strategy? Try to keep up,
will you.
Of course you don't want to mention anything about your idiotic play
strategies, it would make you look even more foolish.
> > You turned it into being 'about you' Dicky boy when you claim
to
> have proven I cannot and do not win as I report.
> Wrong again moosebreath. I never claimed to have proven anything
> about YOU. What I have said many times is ... I don't care if
you've
> won or lost. Lottery winners occur every week and that doesn't
make
> the lottery a positive expectation game. If you've won, good for
you,
> now let's get back to your worthless, scam system and your
mythical
> math guys and the rest of your lies ...
One problem--I'm not a weekly wonder and that's what bugs you.
You're not even a yearly "wonder". The only thing we all "wonder"
about is when you'll admit you lied or, once again, run away and hide.
And
it's because of my strategy that it's almost guaranteed that I'll
not
only win more than anyone else over the next 12 months---I'll with
far more consistently than anyone else will too.
More monkey boy BS. If this was true you'd have snatched up Cogno's
challenge about future results. You can't claim future success and
then put your tail between your legs and run away from absolute
proof.
> I've already proven your system is a fraud. Adding negative
numbers
> can only get a negative result. How many times are you going to
see
> this and still try to maneuver around it?
And I've told you the strategy adds those numbers and comes up
positive.
That's why you are a complete idiot. You might as well be saying the
earth is flat, my strategy makes it so. Or, the sun rises in the west
because of my strategy. Or, your mythical math guys really exist.
They are all equally valid statements.
If you don't want to see it and it puts your old brain into
tilt then that's your little problem, because it certainly is good
enough for me and my bankers.
NO, I bet if you told your bankers that adding up negative numbers
would come out with a positive results, they would disagree with you
completely. LMAO.
> Since I don't care and no one else cares, why should I spend any
time figuring it out. However, be assured it could be done. The IRS
is far from infallible. They work off the documents that are
provided
them. They have no way of analyzing cash payments, illegal money
> laundering, etc. Like I said there's NO way to prove or disprove
your statement. It wouldn't surprise me one bit that you've been
selling illegal drugs and funneling that money in as gambling
winnings. Can you prove you've NEVER done this?
I guess you're trying not to believe it, but you're kind of lost
again and rambling. What cash payments are you talking about?
Any number of possible sources. I gave illegal drugs as one
possibility.
And
money laundering?? You're going waaaay out and you know it. Seems
like desperation.
No, you see when you want to prove an assertion, all it takes is ONE
example where your assertion fails and your assertion is invalid.
That's the trouble with assertions, they are hard to prove valid and
easy to prove invalid.
Here's an example from my 2002 audit report: On March 6th I
withdrew
$17,200 cash from my bank in Az., and I drove overnight to LV. At
Bellagio I did a pre-check in, sat down and started playing $1 BP
at
the Baccarat Bar, 2nd machine from the end/left, and hit the
progressive Royal for $5489 within 4 minutes. Profit = $5464. I
immediately checked out (it's March 7th early am), stopped at the
Nv.
branch of my bank and re-deposited $22,664 and then drive home. My
$40 tip is recorded as an expense on my Schedule C, right alongside
the rental car, gasoline, and tuna sub I bought at Subway at Pilot
in
Kingman on the way home. You'd review my bank statements on-line or
in-person with me at my bank--your choice. My W2G for $5489 is
dated
3/7/2002.
All of this PROVEs nothing. These are simply ASSERTIONs on your part.
W2Gs are meaningless because EVERYONE knows that they are only part
of the story. They only account for winnings and not the losing that
occurs between them. I had many W2Gs last year and I certainly did
not win the full amount they total up to. For all we know you you
lost $5000 getting it, or after you got it you lost $10000 in some AZ
indian casino. Can you prove otherwise???
My casino contemporaneous records are noted in detail.
Since we already know you are a pathological liar, who would ever
believe your casino records? Maybe you could sell them to Disney,
they're always looking for new fairy tales.
Even
my year-end Bellagio 'statement of winnings & losses' has this
entry
right--although those records aren't noted for their accuracy.
Which is why they are not accepted as legal evidence. All it takes is
a little card pulling to make them completely worthless. Not to
mention that everyone has different levels of success at different
casinos.
Following it so far?
Completely. When are you going to come up with ANYTHING provable?
So where would the possibility of any of that
stuff about illegal monies you mentioned fit in?
You mention one day out of 365 and you want us to believe that
eliminates the possiblity of illegal activities? You've got to be
kidding. You are the stupidest bozo I've ever seen.
And to top it all
off, it there were even the SLIGHTEST doubt on your end about the
absolute accuracy of my presentation, the Arbitrator would step in
for a final decision.
You better be careful here. If the requirement to the arbitrator was
that there was ABSOLUTELY no other possible explanation, then you
would lose. Once again, if you want to call it proof then that would
be the grounds for arbitration. You'd have to account for every
single minute of your life to PROVE you didn't get money from illegal
drugs or blackmail or any other numerous crimes. We alrady know you
are a scammer, it's not a big stretch to believe you are involved in
other illegal activities. In fact, your VP scam is the perfect way to
launder the illegal monies. I think I'm on to something.
It really can't be any clearer, and it's
exactly the way I offered it up in GT.
The difference now is your talking with someone who already knows you
are a liar and a fraud. I would want absolute proof which you cannot
provide.
> Nope. To ANY VP expectation. VP machines don't majicly start
running different algorithms when you walk in the room. They are
programmed one way. RANDOM cards are dealt, random cards are drawn,
each hand is independent. Given these simple requirements the
expectation of the
> game is easily computed using simple arithmetic. If the answer
comes up negative, then it will remain negative forever.
Where you're misled is that, once again, you're applying foolish
long-
term rules to short-term play.
Where did I say "long-term"? Nowhere. I'm simply referring to
expectation. The same value used by casinos. Doesn't matter whether
it's short-term or long-term.
Into infinity the answer will be
negative, but not every INDIVIDUAL solution comes up negative.
The expectation ALWAYS comes up negative. 100% of the time when you
play on negative machines.
I've
figured out how to tap into those positive events,
More snake oil. This is equivalent to saying you are psychic. If you
are, then that changes the definition I gave above. The game would no
longer be RANDOM. Are you claiming psychic abilities?
while others
(i.e. 'advantage players') waltz right on by them as if they never
occured. It's a very complex concept,
More snake oil.
yet when you try to simplify it
by whining about how negetive games yield only negative results,
I never said that. I said negative EXPECTATIONs. Can't you keep
anything straight in that stupefied brain of yours>
> > I have no need of the proof I had when the strategy was
developed.
>
> LMAO. Only a real fool could make such an idiotic statement. It's
> such an obvious lie. If you ever had such a proof you'd be
wearing
it around on your underwear. We all know there cannot be TWO proofs
that come to opposing conclusions. Since I've already proven your
system doesn't work, then you MUST be lying, again.
You mentioned underware because I seem to have the talent of giving
you a wedgie even from afar.
I said underwear because I assumed the proof would be on your
forehead and that's the closest piece of clothing to where your
forehead is normally located.
I figure you don't want the proof
because you wouldn't know what to do with it---which is also the
reason why you make believe you want it. Go ahead, give it a try
before that innocent little wedgie turns into a majestic fudgie
wudgie.
Just provide the proof or admit you lied. It's really that simple.
> > > Many. Ones that are sold to stroke your enormous ego. Ones to
> > create a name so you can write books about your nonsense (for a
> > profit). Need I go on.
> >
> > Yes you need to, because I sell nothing to 'stroke an ego' and
I
> give away all my book profits.
>
> Lie. Last year you indicated you gave the profits to someone to
> maintain your website. Do you think they would have done it for
free? No? Then you are profiting from your books. This is way too
easy.
Answer--YES, he would gladly be doing it for free. You see, he
makes
money playing his own version of my strategy which i took the time
to
teach him in 2000, but unlike you, he only plays twice a year
because
he's not a sorry addict.
Lie. That's no what you said last year.
> > Does that casino have the most efficient ventilation system
known
> to
> > man, or could it just be that no one else anywhere in the
casino
> was
> > smoking? And you win, you lose, blah blah blah the pennies you
say you do, but the bottom line is you're a hopeless addict and you
> know it. But wait! I MUST be wrong!! The casino manager knows
you're in there at a whole 2% advantage,
>
> No, he works off of theoretical returns.
So why doesn't he fear you as he would any advantage BJ player who
works with a 1% edge at best--and we know they all get tossed
immediately when spotted?
Because they don't have any system in place to detect advantage
players ... yet.
>
> > so he's going to get fired for letting
> > you play! How did he let that fact slip by???
>
> They don't track individuals. They look at overall return of each
> machine and pull it out if it doesn't make them money.
BS. Now you're trying to make it appear that when you use that
stupid
slot club card they don't ever analyze the results of the
individual.
The only individuals they would care about are those pulling out
LARGE amounts of money. That's why they only have positive games in
small denoms and why every casino has pulled out their dollar FPDW.
For now, they are willing to let a few small fish survive.
Just how many fantasies can you fit into that little brain of yours
anyway? But whenever you're feeling feisty and confident you're
always first to brag about all the comps you get from using the
card.
I've seen inconsistencies before, but I'm surprised you let this
slip.
Nothing inconsistent here. Do you have a reading comprehension
problem?
> The casinos still work off percentages and theorethical returns.
As
> long as they keep doing that there will be plenty of room to
slide
> under the radar. When that day ends and they start looking at
> individual results, the gravy train will be over and it will be
time to play golf and tennis exclusively.
More inconsistencies. You've seen time and again on vpFREE and
elsewhere how the mysterious "hundreds of vp pros lurking the
streets
of LV" are always being banned, barred, and maybe even boobed for
their winning prowess.
Then I guess you're now admitting they are successful and advantage
play works. Otherwise why would they be banned?
Of course I don't believe any of it because
advantage players are the game's biggest losers, and people who say
that are only doing so to create a feel-good position to justify &
soften the misery of their losing.
You can't have it both ways. Either they are banned and advantage
play is successful or they are not banned and your entire argument is
worthless. Which way is it? You really should ask yourself why your
mind contradicts itself in the middle of single paragraph?
But you believe it. So please tell
us how it can be that the casinos don't care a hoot about the
individual's results again?
Because they can't tell the difference between someone who has had a
lucky run and will eventually give it all back and an advantage
player. Someday this will change and they will be able to compute the
expected return for each player. Don't worry, you won't be banned.