In a message dated 11/28/2005 10:37:46 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
bob.dancer@compdance.com writes:
<<I was discussing whether it was likely I could
average $150K a year or more playing live poker --- given my personal
strengths, weaknesses, and already-obtained skills. If not, it would
make no sense to change games.>>
Your statement reminds me of a quote:
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof
against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting
ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
~Herbert Spencer
I haven't changed games, just simply added on poker. I'm having the time of
my life and I'm 61 yrs old, too old to learn anything right? The software
and books I'm studying are like brain candy. Anybody reading this with any self
imagined mental limitations can prove themselves wrong by doing the "Cloud
busting" experiment on the Neil Slade site, _http://www.neilslade.com/_
(http://www.neilslade.com/) It really works. It really does.
JT
Moderator of vpPOKER, a yahoo group for video poker players interested in
live/Internet poker. vpPOKER-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]