vpFREE Admin wrote:
> In reference to Jaime's "Shoot me a note if you're interested in
> learning more" comment: I've been trying, unsuccessfully, for some
> time to find out some specifics on who qualifies for ValetNoir's
> services, and why VN might be better than an in-house host. A post
> that provides some details would be of interest to me, and probably
> others also.
On 24 Jan 2005 at 9:09, Harry Porter replied:
I'll offer a couple of anecdotal comments based upon limited
interaction with VN. However, the truth is that I'm sure Jaime would
love to respond in some fashion to this (but, of course, is now
hesitant given concerns/objections expressed to her earlier post).
No reason to be hesitant.
Jaime has an open invitation to clarify ValetNoir's role in the overall
scheme of things. Two questions:
1. Who is VN's target audience, or specifically, what minimum level of
play (coin-in per day on a casino's better vp machines) does it take to
qualify for VN's services?
2. For a given level of play at a particular casino ($100,000 coin-in
per day on 9/6 JoB at the Venetian, for example) can a player get more,
less, or about the same comps using VN instead of an in-house host?
vpFREE Administrator