vpFREE2 Forums

Progressives, short pay or not

First, thanks Gene for posting all this real time info about some of
the fullpay progressives available in Vegas.

I am curious, when do you folks jump in on a bank of machines with a
progressive, especially a shortpay game?

How about 5-way progressives, like a 7/5 Bonus game? Is 100% good
enough, or do you want more since the Quads will be hit soon?

The strongest casino for progressives in Laughlin is the Edgewater.
A fairly new bank of $ Bonus 7/5, royal and Aces progressive was at
$7,200,456. Would you jump in?

How about Bonus 7/5 Ace$? The EW has both quarter and $ versions,
with progressive royal and Ace$. Is a 300,000 to 1 shot worth it at
100%?

BS

The strongest casino for progressives in Laughlin is the Edgewater.
A fairly new bank of $ Bonus 7/5, royal and Aces progressive was at
$7,200,456. Would you jump in?

Someone please tell me this is a misprint.
-- Steve in LV who is otherwise confused

> The strongest casino for progressives in Laughlin is the

Edgewater.

> A fairly new bank of $ Bonus 7/5, royal and Aces progressive was

at

> $7,200,456. Would you jump in?

Someone please tell me this is a misprint.
-- Steve in LV who is otherwise confused

If its not a misprint, I'll be chartering a helicopter...anyone want
to join me? :slight_smile:

Don the Dentist

> > The strongest casino for progressives in Laughlin is the
Edgewater.
> > A fairly new bank of $ Bonus 7/5, royal and Aces progressive

was

at
> > $7,200,456. Would you jump in?
>
> Someone please tell me this is a misprint.
> -- Steve in LV who is otherwise confused

If its not a misprint, I'll be chartering a helicopter...anyone

want

to join me? :slight_smile:

Don the Dentist

Hmmm, hmmm...

That is $7,200 for a royal flush, $456 for the Quad Aces.

Winpoker says- 100.0187% varience (68+)
royals fall to 32,918 from 40,234 cycle.

No one was even thinking of playing this game.

(BOC- "dominance, submission...Dominance, SUBmission!)

BS

ยทยทยท

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "dds2124 <dds@l...>" <dds@l...> wrote: