I believe brumar_lv's math is correct. For Jacks or Better, the
probability is about (40,390/649740)^2 ~ 0.003864, and the
reciprocal of the last value is about 259. There may be a
misunderstanding of the question here...how about the re-
phrasing "What is the probability that your next 2 royal flushes
will both be dealt royal flushes?"
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Rick & Lucky Lucy"
<luckylucy39@e...> wrote:
You are saying the probability of hitting 2 DEALT royals back to
back
is only 264 to one when the probability of hitting 1 DEALT royal is
650000 to one? Get real!
Rick
> If you have a solution that isn't "WAY off" then please show us
your
> solution. I thought the 16.25 and 264 values were reasonable
> approximations, but if I'm wrong I'd like to know why.
>
> > Well back to the old drawing board, your calculations are WAY
off.
> > And throw away that calculator from the Cracker Jax box. 
> >
> > The 16.25 you are quoting is royal cycles not dealt hands.
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "brumar_lv" <brumar_lv@y...>
wrote:
> > > Although this has no practical value, here's my stab at
calculating
> > > the likelihood of getting 2 consecutive dealt RF's. I don't
mean in
> > > 2 consecutive plays ... I mean getting a dealt RF and then
the next
> > > RF also being dealt.
> > >
> > > Assume a RF comes, on average, every 40,000 hands.
Likewise, a
dealt
> > > RF comes, on average, every 650,000 hands (both figures are
just
> > > approximations ... the 40,000 figure varies a lot depending
on the
> > > player strategy and type of game).
> > >
> > > 650,000 / 40,000 = 16.25 That is, every 16.25 RF's is
dealt (on
> > > average of course).
> > >
> > > Probability of it happening twice in a row: 16.25 x 16.25 =
264
> > > That is, there is 1 chance in 264 of a dealt RF followed by
another
> > > dealt RF.
> > >
> > > Assuming this is correct, I'm somewhat surprised the odds
are this
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Steve Jacobs <jacobs@x> wrote:
> On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:38 pm, Rick & Lucky Lucy wrote:
> > > low ... I thought it would higher.
> >
> >
> > vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >