Tom,
I am opposed to giving RS any opening to preach his non-strategy. His ideas are completely opposite of the goals of this forum. It would be best if he could simply be ignored and forgotten.
Being realistic and pragmatic, however, we must sometimes choose between the lesser of two dislikes (as we so often have to do in elections).
Therefore, it is probably better to allow him to post openly (fully moderated) than to try to shut him out completely. We can never trust him, but we can hope that he will want to keep that privilege and is intelligent enough to not jeopardize that by also posting under another pseudonym.
Dan
ยทยทยท
At 10:07 AM +0000 3/2/03, vpFREE@yahoogroups.com wrote:
On 1 Mar 2003 at 16:30, Bill Coleman wrote:
> Can we reopen the question of full moderation? I have changed my
opinion on this as well, and I suspect others have, too.
The full-moderation poll is a continuing one. Members who haven't voted
may do so, and those who have, can change their votes at any time.
--
Dan Paymar, author of the book, "Video Poker - Optimum Play"
Editor and Publisher of "Video Poker Times" newsletter
Web site at http://www.OptimumPlay.com