Very good points Dick!
If I end up playing the 9/6 DDB (1-coin in), holding the lone Ace
rather than Ace and K or J of the same suit, I thought is the right
play since 4 Aces pays $400 vs RF paying only $250.
Gilbert,
Most of the games you noted were about 1% lower payback at the .25
level (except for JOB which was around 2%). The loss for the royal
will average out to around 1.3%, so playing the dollars will
actually
cost a little in the long run but should also reduce the
volatility.
You should also note there may be stragegy differences as well.
Dick
PS. It would bother some people to get short pay royals. If this
bothers you as well, it should be another consideration.--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "gilbert_616" <gilbert_616@y...>
wrote:
> Currently the way I am doing it, I've been playing the $1
machines
> 9/6 JB, 8/5 BP, or 9/6 DDB but playing only 1-coin or sometimes 2-
> coins instead of the .25 cents or .05 cents machines that have
> really bad Pay Schedules like 8/5 or 7/5 JB, 7/5 BP, 9/5 or 8/5
DDB.
> I'm doing ok with this most of the time except that 2 or 3 times
> already, the RF shows up which is enough to meet my goal and go
home
> a winner. But on the way home, I still wonder whether I would
have
> been better of in the lower denom (RF paying $1,000 for .25 cent
> machines). RF cycle is approx. 40,000 so I thought I should not
> count on it much to achieve my game plan or goal. If I'm in
vegas,
> no doubt I'll be playing max-coin in those lower denom machines.
> I guess not many play vp with small bankroll like me (in Indian
> casinos) so I think I'll just keep experimenting for awhile to
see
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
> which way is better.
>
> Again, thank you all for your comments and suggestions.
>
> Wish vegas is a lot closer!
> Gilbert