Hi,
Can anyone give me the payback % of the following VP game.
Based upon 5 coins played:
RF 4,000
SF 250
4 Aces 800
4 pictures 400
4 2's-10's 250
FH 45
Fl 30
Str. 20
3k 15
2 pr. 5
Jacks or better 5
The game I saw actually had prog. for RF,4 Aces and 4 pictures.
Thanks,
Larry Feldman
All this is is 9/6 Double Bonus with the J,Q,K substituting for the
2,3,4 as the bonus quads. It's a tiny bit better to have the face
cards be the bonus cards instead, because honor-card quads hit
slightly more often.
The reductions (from fullpay 10/7) in the payoffs on the full house
and the flush each cost about 1.1%. You get a little back for the
bonus quads being J-K rather than 2-4, but I think it's only about
.2%. So this game is only about a 98% return.
***Just checked: regular 9/7 DB is 99.11%; "aces/Faces" 9/7 DB is
99.24%. It's safe to assume that the enhancement to 9/6 DB is .13% as
well. Barely a 98% game. Sucks big time.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja2000" <lfcmja@a...> wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone give me the payback % of the following VP game.Based upon 5 coins played:
RF 4,000
SF 250
4 Aces 800
4 pictures 400
4 2's-10's 250
FH 45
Fl 30
Str. 20
3k 15
2 pr. 5
Jacks or better 5The game I saw actually had prog. for RF,4 Aces and 4 pictures.
> Hi,
> RF 4,000
> SF 250
> 4 Aces 800
> 4 pictures 400
> 4 2's-10's 250
> FH 45
> Fl 30
> Str. 20
> 3k 15
> 2 pr. 5
> Jacks or better 5
>
> The game I saw actually had prog. for RF,4 Aces and 4
pictures.
<rockofjello333@y...> wrote:
All this is is 9/6 Double Bonus with the J,Q,K substituting for the
2,3,4 as the bonus quads. It's a tiny bit better to have the face
cards be the bonus cards instead, because honor-card quads hit
slightly more often.
The game returns 96.54% (var is 30.58). The game most closely
resembles "Double Double Jackpot Poker"; you had to reset the kicker
bonuses to the base level and short pay the Straight to 4 for 1.
Someone else mention using "Double Jackpot Poker" and making the
required changes, so either way, you would get to the same place.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja2000" <lfcmja@a...> wrote:
Actually, I missed the fact that the straight was down to 4, not 5,
making this 9-6-4 Aces and Faces and because of the straight, even
1.1% worse than I thought.
Below 97% now....not good!
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja2000" <lfcmja@a...> wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone give me the payback % of the following VP game.Based upon 5 coins played:
RF 4,000
SF 250
4 Aces 800
4 pictures 400
4 2's-10's 250
FH 45
Fl 30
Str. 20
3k 15
2 pr. 5
Jacks or better 5
Actually, I missed the fact that the straight was down to 4, not 5,
making this 9-6-4 Aces and Faces and because of the straight, even
1.1% worse than I thought.
Below 97% now....not good!
Thanks to all for your replies...the name on the machine glass was
Double Aces and Faces.
Larry F.