STP is not anymore an unknown than any other hand of vp
just a little more complicated to calculate
"wizard of odds.com" has the calculations
and
there are good pay tables for stp, but as hard to find as any good
pay table these days
VEN/PALAZZO had some nice ones that are probably gone by what i am
reading
> As for the writer of the post who felt it was necessary to point
out
what a
> lousy game it was - Stuff a sock in it. I think we had this
discussion on
> vpFREE not long ago regarding posts like that about jackpot
photos.
I've
> enjoyed your posts very much but that one was way out of line.
IMHO.
>
> - Brian in MI
To Brian in MI
I'm new here and since you didn't get my original post, I'll spend
it
out for out. That picture is great casino propaganda. I get the
same
feeling when the Lottery agencies have pictures of people who won
million dollar jackpots from making wagers that return 70%. I am
happy
for the person who hit the jackpot, but want to remind people that
jackpot comes at a cost.
Again, for all those people who don't understand N-Play or STP; the
optimal return MEANS the player has to recieve the fair number of
dealt
winners, if not, then that player is playing a game at less than
optimal return. Or said, differently, one is EXPECTED to hit 10X
with
a dealt royal -- otherwise, the game returns is much less than the
number quoted. I don't like STP game structure because the player
must
make a "6" coin payment on each hand (a sum certain payment) while
his
return is unknown (the payoff is sum uncertain). So if you don't
get
10X with dealt straight flush, or 10X with dealt quads, etc, you
are
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "chungsterama" <chungsty@...> wrote:
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Marksalot300@ wrote:
playing a game at less than optimal return. Food for thought.