someone know the return and variance for the 99.95% version of Pickem
if payoff for 4 sevens is doubled? thanks.
pickem analysis
I got 101.3977 @ 27.3797. All I did was increase the payout for 4 of a
kind to 215 in Winpoker. Don't know if this is right since I am sort
of math challenged<G>.
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Eric <oddsworking@...> wrote:
someone know the return and variance for the 99.95% version of Pickem
if payoff for 4 sevens is doubled? thanks.
You've taken the right approach, but your math mechanics may be off a bit.
Quads pay 600 * 14 (double sevens) / 13 = 646.
I got 100.343%, Var 15.969
Brian
···
ozymandias77096 <ugwf@hal-pc.org> wrote:
I got 101.3977 @ 27.3797. All I did was increase the payout for 4 of a
kind to 215 in Winpoker. Don't know if this is right since I am sort
of math challenged.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I agree on the mean, but get a slightly higher variance (16.4).
I think you need to change it to
Non-Seven quads: 600 * 12 / 13
Seven quads: 1200 * 1 / 13
This gives the same answer for the mean, but increases the variance.
- John
You've taken the right approach, but your math mechanics may be off
a bit.
Quads pay 600 * 14 (double sevens) / 13 = 646.
I got 100.343%, Var 15.969
Brian
ozymandias77096 <ugwf@...> wrote:
I got 101.3977 @ 27.3797. All I did was increase the payout for 4
of a
kind to 215 in Winpoker. Don't know if this is right since I am sort
of math challenged.---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and
30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Brian Lavoie <blavoie46@...> wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]