vpFREE2 Forums

Pep Talk needed - please help! YOUR NOT THE ONLY ONE! :)

It's a loss stretch like this that emphasizes just how important it is
to consistently play at an advantage, where possible, in order to have
an expected cushion when these droughts occur.

One thing I'm kind of surprised hasn't come up in this whole discussion is
the possibility that a lot of us...in particular when we find ourselves in a
downward slump...may NOT actually be playing as accurately as we think we are.
(I am truly impressed by the number of folks here who can claim 100% accuracy
on FVP or WinPoker....I know I can't, even after poking around with it for
years.)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

One thing I'm kind of surprised hasn't come up in this whole

discussion is

the possibility that a lot of us...in particular when we find

ourselves in a

downward slump...may NOT actually be playing as accurately as we

think we are.

(I am truly impressed by the number of folks here who can claim

100% accuracy

on FVP or WinPoker....I know I can't, even after poking around

with it for

years.)

True...but if we weren't, in fact, playing optimally, how would we
know? Live casino play lacking the feedback of the VP software, we
wouldn't know if we'd blown it (although sometimes I "catch" a
mistake after it's too late, for instance in DB when I draw to a
lone Ace and belatedly realize that there were two small cards
suited with the Ace and I should have drawn two to the flush).

I can testify that FPDW and JOB can be played at high speed with
virtual 100% accuracy; FPJW is almost as easy; and 10/7 DB is a
stone cold bitch to play accurately; in fact, I consider FPDB to be
a breakeven game, the EV of +.015 notwithstanding, because it is SO
hard to avoid minor errors.

You also need to consider that the vast majority of errors you or I
would make are minor ones that cost very small amounts of EV.
Playing quarters, for example, the failure to draw to the threeflush
costs something like .02 bets (I'm not going to bother to go look it
up.) Even a dozen or so of these errors in an hour shouldn't result
in a significant decline in results. Even booboos like throwing away
the 5 from 55678 in JOB aren't THAT costly. So in order for a bad
session to have been "caused" by errors, those errors would have had
to be both plentiful and egregious. After a certain amount of
practice, a lot of plays become "automatic", so the chance of an
error brought on by fatigue or inattention lessens with experience.

I'd say that having a crappy day, being tired, in a bad mood, the
cocktail waitresses have particularly nice boobs, my back is
hurting, whatever is making me play inaccurately, isn't costing me
more than 0.2 percent of my EV. Not really enough to "cause" a bad
result (although by no means insignificant in and of itself).

One thing I'm kind of surprised hasn't come up in this whole

discussion is

the possibility that a lot of us...in particular when we find

ourselves in a

downward slump...may NOT actually be playing as accurately as we

think we are.

(I am truly impressed by the number of folks here who can claim

100% accuracy

on FVP or WinPoker....I know I can't, even after poking around

with it for

years.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I agree with you 100%. I know from personal experience, that when
I'm going "bad" for a long period of time, I don't play nearly as
accurately. I also don't believe that most forum members always
play at 100% accurancy. I know I don't, and I have above average
intelligence, schooling, professional degrees, and countless hours
of WinPoker laptop practice over the last 6 years. I'm also a
realist. Those poor misguided souls who think they're "pros", are
doomed to be losers in both the long and short term if they're
playing over their heads.

ยทยทยท

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, rwhannu@a... wrote: