vpFREE2 Forums

One more question about M Progressives

#1

I'm sorry, I did not understand what was discussed on tonight's show. Did they say they were going to lower the meter rise?

I did understand that they were switching the SDB game to TDB. And also that the overall profit on the quarter games was, a dollar. But I must have missed the first part of the show or something because I am not sure what all they said they were going to change.

And also, Frank's announcement of his intent to leave is very disappointing. Saw it coming, but still disappointing. I hope he is still going to be a regular or semi-regular poster on this group.

#2

They are keeping the meter-rise the same, but lowering the base game returns by 1%.

I'll let you all discuss what this means on your own.

I'm glad you'll miss me, but I encourage you to keep listening to the show. The new co-host Richard is one sharp cookie with far more diverse gambling knowledge. He may be just what the show needs.

~FK

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Bartop" <bobbartop@...> wrote:

I'm sorry, I did not understand what was discussed on tonight's show. Did they say they were going to lower the meter rise?

I did understand that they were switching the SDB game to TDB. And also that the overall profit on the quarter games was, a dollar. But I must have missed the first part of the show or something because I am not sure what all they said they were going to change.

And also, Frank's announcement of his intent to leave is very disappointing. Saw it coming, but still disappointing. I hope he is still going to be a regular or semi-regular poster on this group.

#3

Oh my goodness!

I've been a big proponent of this idea, but I don't know if even I would like playing this. When are they going to do it? I'm really curious to see what they do to the pay tables. I guess making it 6-5 JoB instead of 7-5 is easy, but some of the other games I have never seen in a lower format.

As I've mentioned before, I LOVE the way they are set up where eight different jackpots build separately and simultaneously. But I would be comfortable with the following games, and a 1% meter rise.

8-5 JoB 97.30
7-5 BP 98.01
9-6-5 DB 97.81
12-10 DW 97.58
9-5 DDB 97.87
8-5 BPDx 97.40
17-7 JW 98.09
7-5 SDB 97.77

I can't help but think this would get a lot of play and still leave room for the casino. And put it at the bars.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@...> wrote:

They are keeping the meter-rise the same, but lowering the base game returns by 1%.

#4

NO MORE POINT MULITPLIERS on these games.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Bartop" <bobbartop@...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@> wrote:
>
> They are keeping the meter-rise the same, but lowering the base game returns by 1%.
>

Oh my goodness!

I've been a big proponent of this idea, but I don't know if even I would like playing this. When are they going to do it? I'm really curious to see what they do to the pay tables. I guess making it 6-5 JoB instead of 7-5 is easy, but some of the other games I have never seen in a lower format.

As I've mentioned before, I LOVE the way they are set up where eight different jackpots build separately and simultaneously. But I would be comfortable with the following games, and a 1% meter rise.

8-5 JoB 97.30
7-5 BP 98.01
9-6-5 DB 97.81
12-10 DW 97.58
9-5 DDB 97.87
8-5 BPDx 97.40
17-7 JW 98.09
7-5 SDB 97.77

I can't help but think this would get a lot of play and still leave room for the casino. And put it at the bars.