It disagrees by 0.65% with Bob Dancer's figures in the May, 2004 Strictly
Slots.
[Original Message]
From: vpFREE <vpFREE@Cox.net>
To: <vpFREE@Yahoogroups.com>
Date: 8/15/2004 12:20:13 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] OEJ AnalysisThe Wizard of Odds has released an analysis of One Eyed Jacks:
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3nxkq">
http://tinyurl.com/3nxkq</a>vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
Yahoo! Groups Links
Thanks, Howard, hoping you can give more info too. First, disagrees
which way and on which paychedule? The first one (99.62%)? Second, is
the SS article online? I looked in their archives on this page
<http://www.strictlyslots.com/archive/>
and didnt see it.
Thanks.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern" <howard.w.stern@e...>
wrote:
It disagrees by 0.65% with Bob Dancer's figures in the May, 2004
Strictly
Slots.
I looked at the web page. The assumption that a natural royal in
spades and hearts is counted as only a wild royal is incorrect. They
are counted as full royals.
In addition, the game can be found in various versions at MSS, Sam's
Town, Tuscany and Imperial Palace. Probably some others but these I
have personally seen.
NO full pay versions of standard OEJs in LV. Seems odd doesn't it
since they are available in other parts of the country.
Dick
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern" <howard.w.stern@e...>
wrote:
It disagrees by 0.65% with Bob Dancer's figures in the May, 2004
Strictly
Slots.
> [Original Message]
> From: vpFREE <vpFREE@C...>
> To: <vpFREE@Y...>
> Date: 8/15/2004 12:20:13 PM
> Subject: [vpFREE] OEJ Analysis
>
>
> The Wizard of Odds has released an analysis of One Eyed Jacks:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3nxkq
>
> <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3nxkq">
> http://tinyurl.com/3nxkq</a>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>