--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> It's nice to know that Robbie is so jealous of me that he
mentions
my name in most of his posts. I've decided to combine all of these
threads together to limit the number of items posted. They're all
pretty much the same anyway, since Rob repeats himself so often.
But little dicky, I thought you KNEW this was all about humiliating
such a farce as you! And admit it, the only readon you pasted all
the
posts is so you could delete as much ridicule and truths about you
as
possible. C'mon....play fair............
If that was the reason then why didn't I delete it all or even 10%?
Sorry, little man, but your lies are easily refuted.
> I do want to highlight some of the latest descrepancies in Rob's
> posts. The lastest is the change in win goals on his lastest trip
to Laughlin. So far this year Rob has claimed a win everytime he
gambled. Now, he lowers his win goal to $1500. Ask yourself this,
if
you were winning every time you played, why would you lower the
goal?
> If anything, most of us would raise the goal. Food for thought.
Probably a vaild question----if you were talking to a fellow
addict!
People who raise goals for no reason have little discipline and
fall
more into you and your wife's sad category than anywhere else. I
play
only for goals and these days only when there's something my
children
may want.
Sorry, Rob but you've claimed many times that discipline is a big
reason for your success. Now, you change tactics in mid-stream.
Discipline? You've got to be kidding. Not to mention, you drove all
the way over to Laughlin. If winning was such a sure thing, why not
stay an extra hour and get the whole $2500? Do you actually think
anyone will believe your excuse. ROTFLMAO.
> I also wanted to highlight another item. Rob never responded to
this question so let me ask him again. How can you have only 8
losses
at the $25 level and yet claim a total of 31 session losses
overall?
Hint: This is impossible, I suspect Rob just didn't think through
this lie. Of course, this calls into question EVERYTHING that Rob
has
ever claimed. If he will lie about his gambling record here, how
can
anyone accept ANYTHING he says as the truth.
Sorry little dicky, but in your continuing quest to one-up me you
just seem to keep falling back on your face that's already
completely
covered with egg. I saved you the embarrassment before, but you're
asking for another smack--so here goes!---8 losses (or close to
that)
at $25/1 @ $100/and close to 22 on $10. Read Rule #6 again from my
strategy page. It'll clearly tell you why your 'impossible dream'
is
now just another nightmare for you to wallow thru all night long.
Robbie's Rule #6: When caught in an obvious lie ... come up with a
new lie.
Too bad this lie isn't any better than your last one. As everyone
else knows (and Robbie should too), any single level in a progression
is equivalent to any session played without a progression. So, let's
take a look at Rob's results. He claims to have won 23/31 at $25 and
7/8 at $100 ... for a total of 30/39 wins. He also claims to have
had, at most, 31 losses at the $10 level. I believe Rob is now a 259
total tries.
a) Previously Rob indicated is reached the $100 level about 10% of
the time. Now it appears he's changed that to 3%. Chalk up another
lie.
b) The chances of winning 30/39 sessions is nearly impossible. A
positive game like 10-6 DDB gives around a 30-40% chance of winning
any one of these sessions. Rob claims over 75% wins. This is
hilarious.
c) Now let's look at level four. Rob is claiming a total of 31 losses
out of around 150 tries. Yup, he's claiming another 80% win rate
equivalent to a single session player expectation of 30-40%. Not to
mention that the 30-40% number is ANY win, Rob needs to cover the
losses of all his previous levels also. This is even more hilarious.
d) When I came up with the 1% probability of reaching his current win
level it assumed ALL sessions included the $25 level if needed. Now,
I suspect the number will be less than .1%. In fact, out of 1000 sims
I didn't get a single win total equal to Rob's claims.
Sorry Rob, this lie isn't any better than the last one.
> Re: Little dicky's Shattered Life....
Yes, I like that one!
You like all of your lies.
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> > > > > > I've figured out why my pal is so misled and
> unknowledgeable in the world of the modern programmer, and why he
can't listen to or even hear logic. He's still embedded into the
days
where he used punch-out cards to program the computers!
> >
> > > > > Sorry to blow your bubble again moron, but punch cards
went
> out
> > > in the 60s. Sure, a few technically backwards organization
still
> > used them (probably where Rob came up with this).
> >
> > > > HAHAHA!! A RATTLED LITTLE DICKY isn't the WORD for what he
must
> > be going through with this shot! Goddam---right to the HEART!!
> > Imagine what would happen if I opened my eyes and fired away!!
> > (Now onto the neurotic try at 'setting the record straight' so
in
> > > his mind, he won't be able to believe anyone's laughing at
him.)
> >
> > > Are you through babbling yet? I guess Rob must have thought
punch
> > > cards were used into the 90s. Is he lost or what?
> >
> > Doesn't much matter what I think, little dicky.
>
> I agree with that statement completely.
>
> > What I KNOW is what's
> > important here, and I know you are RATTLED beyond your normal
> limit.
> > Why else would you be so persistent on telling us meaningless
> > nonsense about the punch cards you're so infatuated with??
>
> Nice try dipstick. I made you look like a fool for bringing up
punch cards. It's been obvious for a long time that you are
complete
techno-weenie. This just adds more evidence.
When "back in the day" means punchcards for you and that's what you
base all your illogic and denial on here, then your meals will
forever consist of crow.
You can't get out of your situation. You've shown just how out-of-
date with reality you are. How are all those corded phones in your
house doing?
> > > > >>However, I started using
> > > > > dependent computer terminals in the early 70s and was
using
> > both networked PCs and UNIX workstations at the time I retired.
I
> > know you won't understand any of this, but others will.
> > > >
> > > > I don't know about laughing any more here, because I've
laughed so much I now have to THROW UP!!
> > >
> > > Nice try,
I know, but aren't they all.....
No, some of them are very poor tries. In everycase all they amount to
is a "try".
but you've once again shown you have no comprehension
> of the real world. Of course, RIV has been telling us that all
> along. Now we get to see it from Robbie himself.
I suppose Robbie still plays pong too ... on his B&W TV.
> >
> > You have no mercy. You want me to DIE LAUGHING at your damage
> > control!?
> Hollow words. Do you still believe that no one can read? You
brought up punch cards, you look foolish. How's that rotary phone
of
yours?
You know, I actually stopped laughing while you went on another
gambling binge, but now my side has to be stitched up AGAIN!!!
HHHAAA HA HA HA!!!!!
A very poor try. Just as hollow as before. PS. I still haven't
gambled since 4/4.
> > > > > One dimensional....B&W.....and too simple for words. And
why doesn't he want to realize the technological advances
> > > > that have been made? Obviously, the girls in the short
skirts
> who sat nearby and punched the cards all day long! I really
should
> > start charging for this stuff!
> > > > > You already got paid more than this drivel is worth.
ZERO.
> > > > > PS. I'll correct your spelling for you in the subject
line.
> > > I can only imagine the embarrassment that would cause Rob to
> babble on like this. We've already seen many times that his
frustration is directly correlated to his babbling. Of course,
everyone can see why Rob is resorting to trash talking. I've proved
him to be a LAF and a con man. His back is against the wall.
> > Yes, that's some wall behind me there, yesiree! Babbling/trash-
> > talking....oh my, these are the main issues here now that
little
> > dicky can't find his way home to comfy land. Yikes!
>
> RIV. Still works for me. By the way, Are your rabbit ears still
> bringing in good TV reception?
What? Now you're saying I have "rabbit ears" on Easter sunday??
Every morning.
> -------
> Re: VP Machines ARE Programmed To Run In Few Hot & Many More Cold
> Cycles
But isn't it good to see those truthful but to some, hurtful, words
once again.....
Yes, I don't mind you being associated with a mathematical
impossibility.
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> > > > Give it up, little dicky. Over and over again you're out-
> classed and made the fool of your own field. Trying to make
yourself feel better about all the sense here is superficial and
will
be rendered useless just as soon as you read my reply. I sense
you're
geek-armor weakening as we speak. Oh, can it EVER get any better
than this?!! When will we have the chance again to watch as little
dicky wallows away in self-sympathy?? And I though pulling the
nerds'
pants down in the girl's high school gym was the epic moment in my
life!
> > > >
> > > > > I see that Rob's "wordiness" continues.
> > > >
> > > > Yup--by a professional writer to boot! The more I can lay
on
> you the better the day....and night!
> > >
> > > Oh, haven't you been sleeping well? That's too bad, I suppose
> > having your con exposed will do that. All you need to do is go
get some help and you'll feel much better.
> >
> > I don't need sleep when I'm having THIS much fun! I could stay
> awake forever if I was able to write you into the ground as often
as I'm doing tonight!!
>
> I think it's pretty clear that all these words ... babbled in
every
> post ... claiming to have so much fun ... is a little too forced.
> Could it be that this is just another attempt to try and look
good
in the face of overwhelming defeat? Rob's Little Bighorn.
HAHA! Watching your armor deteriorate is only the BEGINNING of the
fun!
Let's keep track of how many facts Rob posts here. So far ... ZERO.
Of course, the rest is his normal babbling.
> > > > >Did I mention that is a sure sign he has been rattled?
> > > >
> > > > Kind of a wee bit too late to wear that comfy blankey to
bed,
> > > little dicky. You've been spanked so hard MY HAND is red!
> > > It's never too late for the truth. You should know that by
now.
> >
> > Now you're speaking my language. Too late though. Both my hand
and your butt are RED!
>
> So, Rob wants to touch my butt. I knew he was jealous, but this
is
a little extreme.
A spanking's a spanking!
A pervert is a pervert.
> > > > >Yup, poor Robbie, repeating the same insults over and over
> > again. Is he this repetitive in real life?
> >
> > >And loving every repeat, because just as we used to kick the
nerds down when they tried so hard to get up, it's just as
satisfying
now....even more so, as I get to watch a live nerd suffer over and
over again before my very eyes. Thank you God!
> > > Notice the dramatic increase in words. A sure sign I called
this one correctly. Not only that, but he just repeated his
standard
BS again. How sweet it is ...
> >
> > You're right--I'm really on a roll tonight and lovin every
minute
> of it! What a way to end a great day! Nerd-whacking!!
>
> The repetitive, hollow words continue. Each time he demonstrates
his obvious frustration. How sweet it is ...
Yes, it is VERY sweet getting in this many shots. and i thought the
fun of the holiday was over!!
Over and over again. All part of Robbie's Rule #6.
> > > > > I bet Rob really like the one about buying property in
> > Louisiana.
> > > >
> > > > I'll wait and see if optdouble can respond, but don't
count
on it. He claims to be a software engineer, yet, he doesn't
understand that "secondary programming" and a "second program" are
two entirely different things. Secondary programming is ANY code
inserted to modify the behavior of the RNG.
> > > > Isn't that just like a nervous ranting geek to make believe
he knows things someone else doesn't--
> > >
> > > I think your shill has been uncovered, little man. Opt-shill
goes
> > on about ALL sorts of special programming that would take lots
of
> > extra memory. I guess he thinks IGT is in the business to lose
> money
> > just to provide special help to the casinos. He also failed to
> > explain why the NGC, which reviews every line of code, would
> somehow
> > miss all of this special programming.
> >
> > Yada yada yada on and on and on about his saving face. He just
HAD
> to
> > get these words of geek-wisdom in or else he would toss and
turn
> all
> > night long!
>
> It appears Robbie faces another sleepless night. Did you see him
> refute anything I stated? Nope. Once again the facts are little
> Robbie's downfall. How sweet it is ...
You mean refute what you refute? You have no facts, so why waste
time? Optdouble's obviously bothered you with his logic and you sit
there stymied and irritated. All that does is give me a warm and
fuzzy that you are left speechless again. Yummy!
LMAO. You mean his claims of a backroom switch? I can just imagine
that gives you a "warm and fuzzy" one. Hollow doesn't even begin to
describe this statement ... All you have to do is read reg 5 and 14
to know that this is illegal.
http://gaming.nv.gov/stats_regs.htm#regs
> > > > and/or tries to correct someone with BS!
> > > > Where would this nerd be without his ability to 'set his
record
> > > > straight' which he so neurotically needs to do every time
> someone
> > > > comes on and shows a tad bit of intelligence that goes
beyond
> his
> > > > archaic knowledge base? How he must HURT inside.....
> >
> > > Yup, your shill sure is "intelligent", I'd think even you
would
> > have been embarrassed by his ridiculous statements.
> >
> > I don't really know what a 'shill' is, but I'm betting it's
some
> sort
> > of imaginary thing having to do with gambling, since gambling
> > controls every aspect of your life.
(and needless to say little dicky was in a hurry here too)
> --------------------
I didn't care if you understood or not. Everyone else knows, which
puts you right where I want you.
> Re: VP Machines ARE Programmed To Run In Few Hot & Many More Cold
> Cycles
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks, Rob. Finally a clear explanation that we can
all understand. Although we will be probably see a bunch of
replies talking about how this is "illegal" and "wouldn't be
allowed".
> > > > > That's because it IS illegal ... not to mention, casinos
have nothing to gain. They already have the edge in almost all
> games. Why would they risk losing their lucrative gambling
business?
> >
> > > > Blah blah blah---same old rant with the same old tune of
geek-
> > > denial attached.
> > >
> > > Looks like the facts did it again. Stopped Robbie cold.
> >
> > Brrrrr....yup it's really cold here in Phoenix tonight! If
little
> > dicky had any facts for a change I'd dance the jig. All I see
is
> > whining like "gee, it's illegal because I don't do it"
and "casinos have nothing to gain because I don't get that part of
it". Truly, a weeny whiner!
> Still out in the cold, little man? How does it feel to have your
> idiotic claims shown impotent time and again?
It might be a tad more meaningful if you supplied some reason and a
little less whining. You've got nowhere to go but up here anyway.
I guess Robbie must be fully in agreement with opt-shill that the
casinos violate reg 5. ROTFLMAO.
> Do you really trust the casinos that much??? After
> minimally complying with the regulations, you should expect them
to
> try and take every dollar that they can in any way humanly
possible.
>Well, first off, this would NOT be "minimally complying with
> > the regulations", it would be breaking the law.
>Which law---geek law?
> NV law that doesn't allow machines to be modifed.
(and needless to say little Robbie was in a hurry here too)
> > That's exactly why they arrive in true form just as I've
explained with the facts a thousand times. What? Doesn't fit into
little dicky's pipeline mind? Must be wrong!! Geek-law is right and
> everyone else is wrong!!
> Everyone else (except you and opt-shill) can read the law and
accept it. If they've been in casinos very often they've probably
even seen techs changing paytables/games/etc. The machine is shut
down and the process takes quite a bit of time. Next, I suppose,
you'll claim they do this all for show. LMAO.
I know you're digging for more info here because this knowledge
interests you. You might even pick up some of that longed for info
if
you'd let me explain the Nv. contract to you. You only have two
shades--Black & White. The contract is multi-colored for several
purposes that you'll never get with the blinders planted firmly
onto
your face. And what does the tekkies working on machines have to do
with the way they are programmed in cycles at the factory?
What is "multi-colored" about the word NO? It is so ammusing to see
Robbie scramble here. So, let's see him do it again ... Robbie
explain the "contract" that NV has with the casinos. ROTFLMAO.
> > > > you've already been instructed on how the
> > > > contracts are written, you don't want a personal education
> class on contract law, and you clearly couldn't live with
yourself
if you ever came to the understanding that what you believe in is
not
the way it is. Does the words 'little dicky's foolish' make any
sense
to you??
> > >
> > > Still no contracts involved, LAFman. Just NGC regs. However,
this is an entirely different regulation (reg 5). The one that
doesn't allow casinos to change any programming in the machines
without NGC approval. Let's hear you lie your way of of this one.
> >
> > Right on cue! I've directed little dicky to look up more of the
> state CONTRACT and he does EXACTLY as I tricked him into doing--
flops out another regulation from the CONTRACT. And this gets
funnier. Then he proceeds to step into it BIG TIME! He makes
believe
everyone against his geek-logic is sayiung that the machines are
changed after they arrive at the casinos!! Can anyone possibly be
more thick??
> ROTFLMAO. Did Rob actually think anyone would read his mighty
babble and believe it? All he did was deny what is clearly written
in
black and white. Rob, you're not doing too well here. Maybe you
should rethink your entire approach. Just tell everyone the dog ate
all the NGC regs and made them invalid.
Remember those blinders and remember the colors. And just now dense
can you be not to understand that the regs are included in a
CONTRACT??
Still waiting for you explain a "contract" where neither party signs
off on it. This is too funny.
How can you possibly expect even your 2 fans here to
continue believing anything you spew??? I try to play fair, but gee
whiz--you give me soooo much of an advantage!
Chucle, chuckle. I'm still waiting for you to explain a "contract"
between a state and a bunch of casinos where the casinos have no say
in the matter. Did I mention your scrambling ...
> > > > I mean, who do you think is contributing the money to build
all of those huge casino hotels anyways....
> > > > >
> > > > > The players playing without an edge. Yup, the players who
> play
> > > > > roulette, craps, BJ, stud, etc.; the players crowding
into
> the
> > > > poker rooms where the casinos takes a % of every pot; the
> players
> > > > hitting the slots; the clueless VP players. I think we're
up
to
> > > about 99% of casino customers. Was this really supposed to be
an
> > > > intelligent statement?
> > > >
> > > > There it is again....it's "the other guys" who lose and not
> > little dicky or any of the 'gurus'. Ho-Hum.... So wordy, yet so
> > nerdy....
> >
> > > So, you think these players all win? How do the casinos stay
in
> > > business?
> >
> > Only a few intelligent players win, bozo. Like myself, Bob, and
a
> > handful of people who write to me that all use some variation
of
my play strategies.
>
> Save your watch ...
???
Is that your definition of a contract? Not surprising ...
> > Fools like you & the gurus have no chance without
> > continuous extreme luck and you know it. The real money never
> leaves with you. You make a bundle in 'phantom bucks' because you
play like frenzied addicts, but how many times are you laughed at
when you walk in the bank with a theoretical deposit??!!
> Another scramble, Robbie? This is getting beyond OBVIOUS. I have
you
> so nailed at every turn that all you can do is babble. By the
way,
> did you get your babbler tuned up? While you're at it, I would
also
> suggest a brain overhaul. Your current one is leaking logic all
over the place.
Silly, maybe self-entertaining....but as usual, a simple cover to
that which you are in extreme denial about.
Still leaking. But I'm glad you admitted I was entertaining.
> > > > > > So, basically a bunch of "advantage players" playing
the
> same
> > > > > machine more or less ensures that the number of Royal
Flushes
> > will be LESS than expected almost all of the time since the
machine
> > will not be making enough money to get into a mode where "hot
cycle
> > corrections" are needed.
> >
> > > > > Did I mention clueless?
> >
> > > > I certainly have, many times, and you fit that bill like a
tee.
> >
> > > Poor try Robbie. This guy's just another yahoo who believes
the
> > > machines are controlled externally. Even you know better than
> that.
> >
> > Externally? Now you making THAT up too?? Are you THAT sore
about
> > losing here??
>
> Sorry, to hit you with the facts again, but your shill claimed
that
> the machines would be set to pay back less during promotions.
That
is called an "external switch". So, are you supporting this
position?
> Are you claiming to be just as idiotic?
I don't have info on this new point other than to NOT believe you,
because that's always the safe bet. One thing i do know. I watched
a
vp tournament in Laughlin 2 years ago, and the Royals were coming
out
as fast as R,W, & B 7's in slot machine tournaments. How'd they do
that?
So, you are claiming to believe there's an illegal external switch.
LMAO. By the way, if they put a tournament board into the machines
they can pay back whatever they want. These special boards also
usually have timers or countdown credits. Are you really this
clueless?
> > > > > > In other words, enough idiot players would be needed
to
> > > > > > make the required profit on the machine to ensure that
> enough Royal Flushes could be "allowed".
> >
> > > > > I wonder if this guy even understands that this is beyond
> > > secondary programming. This would require throwing out the
RNG
> > altogether.
> >
> More evidence that you've never kept up with modern technology in
your own sorry field. Do you have to keep embarrassing me, as your
sponsor here??
LMAO. You just supported a claim that hands were given out based on
some other criteria besides random. This is "throwing out the RNG". I
think embarrassing is too easy a word to describe your situation.
> > >
> > > Your repetitive words are getting more hollow all the time.
> Please explain how the NGC code reviewers would miss all this
extra
code.
And who says it's "missed"? You're even misleading yourself
now....incredible!
I see. The NGC makes regs that the employees purposedly ignore or are
instructed to ignore. And, no employee EVER admits this. LMAO. Did
the Easter bunny bring you this tale?
> > Please...PLEASE stop embarrassing yourself! It embarrasses me
too
> you know, as your sponsor here!
>
> LMAO. Put a direct question to Robbie and watch him scramble.
Whatsa matter, little man. The truth hitting you where it hurts?
As your sponsor here, you should care just a little more than that.
Hmmmm. You sponsor someone proving you are a LAF ... You're not too
bright are you? But then, we already knew that.
> > > This would also suggest that somebody would be a COMPLETE
IDIOT
> to
> > keep playing a machine after it just hit a Royal Flush,
> > > correct? Because the machine would surely be overcorrected
> after
> > that point, and would probably be starting a bunch of new cold
> cycles.
> >
> > > > > So, I guess the two times I hit RFs within 15 minutes of
each
> > > other on the same machine is impossible. I'd better go back
and
> > check those W2Gs and see if they are real.
> >
> > > > You just proved another point. That machine was in a hot
cycle that was required to correct it's hold percentage upwards.
Thank you.
> >
> > > After giving me a double RF? Yup. That's right. This machine
pays double on RFs. 4.4% of the total payout. You better head back
to
> > the drawing board, your lies are easily dismissed.
> >
> > Oh, so now you add THAT in only after you struggled? And leave
it
> to you to make up that 4.4% number. It paid you what it paid you
that night and it had nothing to do with theory. You can't even
enjoy
> the times you win because you're so intertwined with analyzing
every aspect of the math models. No wonder you lead such a sour
life!
>
> Boy is Rob ever scrambling bigtime. Once again he can't respond
to
a factual statement.
If ever you provided a fact to some off-the-wall assertion you've
made, I'll eat my hat on top of the Stratosphere.
So, you don't believe it's a double payabck RF? 8000 credits? Would a
picture suffice or do you need to see it yourself?
> This is getting hilarious. Rob must not know that everytime a big
> storm passes near Louisiana a part of the coast is reclaimed by
the
> gulf. I thought this story was shown so many times last summer
that
> EVERYONE would know it by now. I guess Robbie missed it ... like
so
> many other things that pass him by.
Only gambling addicts paid attention to all that nonsense last
summer, for fear that their favorite machines might not be
available
on their next pass thru while on a phoney vacation. The rest of us
had our own lives to attend to.
So, according to Rob, only gambling addicts watch the news. I suspect
a few folks out there might disagree with this idiotic assertion.
LMAO.
> > > > > > Also, it would stand to reason that correct "casino
> strategy"
> > > for
> > > > > VP machines would be to take over a machine which has
just
> > busted
> > > > out somebody after they placed a decent amount of credits
on
> it,
> > in
> > > > the theory that they have used up a lot of the cold cycles,
and
> > the
> > > > machine is then theoretically nearer to a corrective hot
cycle.
> > > >
> > > > > I doubt that this is Robbie. Even he can see how idiotic
this
> > > > sounds. Did I mention clueless?
> >
> > > > Is that supposed to be a reply--or are you at a loss for
words
> > > > again?? At least you didn't make me laugh here too!
> > >
> > > 18 words this time ... A new record for you. I made my points
and
> > you looked foolish trying to refute the facts with nothing but
> > idiotic babbling. How sweet it is ...
> >
> > HAHAHA! I've even got you analyzing posts now! You are sooooo
my
> > puppet. and being your own worst enemy is an added bonus that I
> thank
> > the Lord for every moment I'm on here!
>
> Yup. You've got me right where I want you. Good job. I still love
the
> one about multiple cold cycles. A mathematical impossibility and
> Robbie keeps uttering it over and over again.
Impossible to you but true to the rest of the world.
"Impossible ... but true" ... Only Rob could utter such an idiotic
line. This is getting good. I can't remember when little Robbie
uttered so MANY foolish comments one right after another.
Did you ever
think that might be the reason you're wearing that Dunce Cap every
waking hour?
ROTFLMAO. I wonder if Robbie even realizes he said the equivalent of
1+1=3, and then states I'm wearing a "Dunce Cap" by believing that
1+1=2. He really keeps 'em coming.
> --------------------------
> Re: The Secret Behind vpFREE
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I know I know, you depend on these long, messy
threads
> to
> > > try and confuse anyone who reads them....which is not the
norm
> for
> > a geek--we all see how nervous you are in your quest to make
> yourself
> > feel at least half-confident after you've been flogged in
public
> yet
> > again. I suggest for that good feeling of being superior, bo on
> back
> > in and boss your wife around again. That'll get your
confidence
> back
> > up there, for sure! Make believe she's me and it'll climb that
much
> > faster. Go ahead---give it your best shot like you do all the
time!
> > Never mind you've never had the upper hand with me. Just "make
> > believe" (now that's not hard for a pathological addict todo,
is
> > it???) you're pushing a REAL MAN around and you'll be set free!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, who is the wordy one? It looks like I hit a
nerve
> > again.
> > > > Rob obviously thought that posting a response, with the
proof
> of
> > > his
> > > > > > lies deleted, that he could make it go away. LMAO.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That hurt, didn't it!
> > > > >
> > > > > No, not in the least. I got a good laugh at all of your
> > babbling.
> > > >
> > > > That REALLY hurt, didn't it!
> > >
> > > Is your babbler stuck? Did I mention repetitive?
> >
> > the more you read it the more you get an itch you'll never be
able
> to
> > scratch. Am I THE MASTER or what!
>
> THE MASTER liar. That is exactly what you are. It's nice to see
we
> agree on something.
By your irritation, even calomine lotion won't help!
Robbie, the master liar. Kind of has a ring to it. At least Rob went
back to his normal babbling instead of uttering another ridiculous
claim.
> > > > It's OK, little dicky. I understand your
> > > > pain here, seeing that you realize other people can see how
you
> > > boss the wife around and all. You can use my nanky. And good.
> > that's the sign of a direct hit. Whenever you try to weasel out
of
> a
> > topic you simply post RIV and hope it all just goes away.
> > >
> > > LMAO. I really think his babbler IS stuck. Same words over
and
> over
> > > again. No facts, no logic, just the same old drivel. Rob, I
think
> > you better take that babbler in for some repairs. Maybe a 2
million
> > > babble checkup.
> >
> > Kinda hard to diffuse the bomb I set about you abusing your
wife
> day
> > in and day out, huh?? Just gets a little under your skin, right
> > little dicky??
>
> This too funny. This is RIV in high gear. Just who do you think
> people would believe is an abuser? A cyberbully like you or a
> logical, fact bearer like myself? ROTFLMAO.
"Fact bearer"?!!! HHHHAAAAAA ahhaaa ah ahah hahaha!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe
if you didn't LIE so much little dicky, you might get your two fans
to support you some more!!
The facts nail Roibbe again. Robbie, the master liar, who believes
1+1=3. Need I say more.
> > > > > No, everyone skims over your babbling so easily. All
those
> > words just go down the tube without having there intended
effect.
> > > >
> > > > Here's a flash, little dicky....they're all for only YOU!!
I
> > > already see your pain here and you never were any good at
hiding
> > it. So why not let's SHARE it!!
> > >
> > > Yawn. Robbie pretty much just admitted to being a complete
moron.
> > > Everyone else can see your words never effect me.
> >
> > Taken from the sticks & stones mentality from growing up! Tey I
saw
> > you geeks a bit differently. You were stomped on, called names,
> > knocked down, you got up, we knocked you fools down again, and
> > eventually you started crying out "MOMMY, MOMMY...the cool guys
are
> > hurting me!!" You're really doing the same thing here. If
nothing
> > affected you you'd simply walk away and not have any need to
say
a
> > thing. But you're hurtin little dicky, and the pain is REAL!
>
> RIV. Robbie was never a cool guy. His continual mention of his
> childhood days makes that abundantly clear. I guess he thinks
that
by asserting he was someone, it will change history ... is this guy
ever going to grow up?
Prove that 'assertion' that i was 'never a cool guy'!! Load up that
geek-gun and fire away!!!
You just proved it yourself. The real "cool guys" moved on with their
lives. Made something of themselves. They don't bring up their high
school days over and over again because they continued to enjoy new
and exciting events in their lives. Just the opposite of little
Robbie.
> > > It's your middle name, Rob Adlads Singer. And, just another
> reason
> > > for your jealousy.
> >
> > Now who in the name of Pete is that!? I swear, you are sooo
corny
> and
> > such a nerd that if I could take a dump on you as you squaeled,
I
> > would!
>
> Once again everyone else got it. You know, in the lines you just
> deleted. LMAO.
??? I guess you got tired here.
Nope. Just another demonstration of you stupidity.
> --------------------------------
> Re: Dancer-haters
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> > > > YOU are your
> > > > own worst enemy, and YOU are the reference you're looking
for.
> > Live with it....but please don't die over it! I need a whipping
> post!!
> >
> > > The old babbler is still stuck. Maybe a little grease between
the
> > > fingers will help.
> >
> > Now wait a minute. My wife isn't all hagged out by casino trips
and
> > as such, I certainly have no reason to grease my fingers. I see
why
> > you do. The romance disappeared long ago, and now you stay
together
> > through intimidation and a mutual addiction to casinos and
> gambling.
> > A legacy to be proud of if there ever was one.
>
> Let's see, which one of us visited a casino in the last two
weeks?
> Uh, that would be Rob. Once again, need I say more ...
May I point out that I didn't drag my wife along with, and neither
was she wanting to go to a casino?? Or how about I might have
played
45 minutes and left?? Now let's compare that to 3 hours a day all
while blaming an addict wife for making you go!! NEXT!!!
More denial. Did we expect anything less? We already know your wife
has to work to support your losses. Someone has to support you.
> ----------------------------
> Re: VP Machines ARE Programmed To Run In Few Hot & Many More Cold
> Cycles
> > The more you post the more I come
> > alive! It's not often that geek-haters get to romp & stomp on
them after high school days are done. Again, thank you God!
> Back into his high school fantasy. You must have been abused
quite
a bit. However, it was 40 years ago, get over it.
Back in my day it was a good piece of ass that brought tears to our
eyes. For you, it was guys like me that made you whimper and cry.
and
don'tcha know it....I'm STILL doing it TODAY!!
Even more evidence. It's been shown over and over again that when
someone keeps repeating some old story, it's highly likely the story
is a lie.
> > > > > And all you've 'proved' is you're a dork. And stupid. and
> > blind. and one who works in a closed room of math models and
geek-
> > expressions. And you're alone. Why, we all should only listen
to
> you
> > and not anyone else who says you're wrong, RIGHT?!! Now maybe
you
> > know what a true vp-blind clown is, RIGHT? RIGHT!
> >
> > > Didn't you mention "wordy" a bit ago? ... It's pretty obvious
> who's
> > rattled here. Rob obviously choose not to respond to my points
> > below because he knows he can't refute the facts. How sweet
> itis ...
> >
> > > one problem with your obvious nervous reply....My words hit
> > > home and cause you trouble every time--
>
> >
> > > which is the prime objective of my existence here. The more I
> > write, as a true writer and not a wannabee trying to 'belong'
like
> > you, the better!
> >
> > > > > Then why didn't Rob write something in response to my
facts?
> > Why did he choose to just babble away instead? You be the the
judge.
> >
> > > > I AM the judge....and jury. And to you, I'm your
executioner
> too!
> > > > Feel that knife called 'the truth'? Feel it going right
thru
> your
> > > > make believe heart? (I say make believe because no human
heart
> > > could EVER treat a wife as disrespectful as you've done)!
> > >
> > > The wife babble again? You're not listening, son. You're
making
a
> > > complete fool out of yourself.
> >
> > I don't THINK so little dicky, and from the sound of your deny
> reply
> > you might just be holding together by a thread!
>
> LMAO. You are getting totally thrashed and you have nowhere to
go.
> You've tried these hollow monkey boy responses before and it
didn't
> work any better then. Remember, you ended up running away and
> sulking. It's going to happen again, because you have no weapons.
All you have is easily refuted lies and false claims.
I've got the BIG advantage here....YOU have to look that poor woman
in the eyes every day and think of what a messed-up retirement
you've
made for her because of problem gambling. Then you've got to face
yourself, if you can ever do it again.
LMAO. Once again Robbie tries the same old hollow words. Come on, no
new lies? You must be a big disappointment to opt-shill.
> > > > i've asked for you to show at least SOME dignity. I mean, I
> > really don't like stomping on a dead man (just a hurtin' one!).
> >
> > > LMAO. Your words are dust. They've dried out and everyone can
now see what's behind them. A frustated bully who has met his match.
> >
> > Now it's 'dust'! The words that 'don't affect him' are
now 'dust'!! Well, it's good to know he can't be 'affected' by
them!!! HAHAHA!!!!
>
> You already knew that ... but you have nothing else to offer. You
> have no weapons, you have no facts, you have no logic. All you
have
> is your childhood fantasies of days long gone. Have I mentioned
that you need help?
(and needless to say little Robbie was in a hurry here too)
> Re: I'm Starting To Worry About The Denyer's Health
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> >
> > With the administered beating this nerd is absorbing, one might
be wondering just how much loss he can endure. Well, from my
> experience these jerks can absorb a HUGE amount of punishment,
but
this might be getting to be too much. I've noticed it takes the
dicker twice as long to respond to my messages than it takes me to
reply to his. One can only imagine the misery he goes through in
doing so. Sounds like fun!
> It is fun. I enjoy making you look foolish. There's no way you
can
> perpetrate your con with your impotence exposed for everyone to
see.
It certainly is as I've said, and it'll just keep getting better as
long as you don't pop thru your roof with the high blood pressure.
115/70
The truth always finds it's mark, and it found you long ago here.
My
job is to keep wailing away at you until you admit your a fool
gambler wqho's cursed his former loving wife with the same disease.
Same old hollow words yet again. Hey, opt-shill, you better have a
talk with the monkey boy, he's lost it entirely.
> > One thing I don't want to see is the dicker getting sick - or
worse.That would be awful. There'd be nothing to look forward to on
here anymore. I enjoy verbally abusing the geek, making him feel
smaller thanhe degenerated into when he allowed pathological
gambling
to take overhis (and unfortunately, her) lives, and it's just sooo
preciouswatching him come unraveled over not understanding modern
technologyassociated within his own geek-field when he was
employed.
And justwhere else can you find someone so willing to deny and lie
abouteverything he makes himself look foolish about? I need him for
laughs.(insert thankful prayer).
> It was nice of RIV to give us some more insight into what is
going
on in Robbie's life. RIV, keep up the good work.
What else could you say?
Nothing else, just the facts, as usual.
> ---------------------
> Re: Now Isn't This Special.....
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
> wrote:
> > From a post tonight on vpFREE-----------
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > "Overall for the trip we didn't hit any royals and finished down
> > about $2800. However, the $165 cashback from the Venetian and
$150
> > sweepstakes win did bring this down to under $2500 in absolute
cash.Just about where I would expect to be with 100K coin-in and no
> royal.
> > rhizome"
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > I guess the math came through for these people, yesiree! Just
where they 'expected to be' after $100k of "playing like the
addicts
do"! And no doubt they bought every book by Jean Scott, Dan Paymar,
and all of Bob Dancer's strategy cards just so it wouldn't be a
surprise when it happened the way the math predicted it would! But
gee, they got their cash back and hit the sweepstakes BIG time,
didn't they...... And you know what? If they get a chance to chat
with any of the gurus or Mr. Wizards....even our own little
dicky....there really will be no problem after all. If they can
somehow manufacture that they played in 'positive EV' situations,
then they've lost absolutely nothing. What they did, by golly, is
WIN
because they 'played with an edge'! Now all they gotta do is figure
out how to deposit all those phantom bucks. At 1.5%, that's 1500 of
them! But you know what? Little dicky can help them there too. He
makes deposits 'all the time'!!
> I think Rob's jealousy here is very telling. An individual posts
an
> honest account of his trip which resulted in a loss. Everyone has
had losses and this is nothing special. However, Rob, who has
claimed
> that APers never admit losing, now comes unglued when a loss is
> reported.
AHAHAH HA HA HA!! I knew you couldn't let that one die little
dicky!
You skipped the point and are now caught again--
You had a point? All you did was go on and on about someone losing
which you admit doing yourself. If that's suppose to be a point then
I think your logic is leaking bigtime.
gee, that's starting
to sound like a broken record about you. This fool poster has been
so
overwhelmingly misled by the gurus and math idiots, that he now
thinks it's allright to lose because "that's what the math
predicted
would happen with no royals"!! If I though he could be saved I'd
write him a personal message. But he obviously clings to the
Queen's
baloney and Dancer's and yours and Paymars etc. etc., and he'll be
a
loser all his life like the rest of his mentors are.
So, I guess Rob really is claiming he NEVER loses. ROTFLMAO. You
should have stuck to your high school fantasies.
> Come on Rob, admit it. You are so jealous of APers that you will
say anything ... even if it contradicts what you've previously said
over and over again.
I wonder if any of that'll ever happen.....
It just did ... again.
OK, let's tally up Rob's facts ... 0+0+...+0 = 0.