strategies. What's wrong with using the best possible paytables,
even if slightly negative, and gradually increasing the variance and
denomination when needed? This is my personal approach, and I
usually play only large casinos (Harrah's, Ameristar, etc.) with
Rob's strategies (I can only progress 5 levels from 5c to $1.00 here
in Missouri due to loss limit laws in the state). I am very happy
with the results I've had and it is a lot more exciting than playing
the same denomination all the time. I do try to stick with math-
based plays using Zamzow's VP Stategy Master, however, but I'm not
going to fault Mr. Singer for wanting to play special plays if he
wants meet a certain goal. His ideas are just a baseline for what I
personally do.
Even so, I do sometimes stick with full-pay AAM and 10/7 DB (if
available) when I feel like relaxing and watching the pretty cocktail
waitresses saunter on by. Video poker is just entertainment to me;
there's TONS more money to be made in the stock market. (The US
equities market is currently valued at $22 trillion.....now how's
THAT for a big casino?!? The entire market capitalization of the
world's largest casino company, Harrah's, is a comparatively puny $8-
9 billion).
Anyway, Rob, could you please share some of what you said on
your "Singer Vision" RealPlayer video clip about machine cycles? I
am very interested in hearing your thoughts on this, but the sound
card in my computer is hopelessly misconfigured and I cannot get it
fixed (and I have Infinity speakers with my PC, what an irony!).
Thanks.
~Psych
···
From my own personal perspective, I respect the math AND Singer's