This person might care because they are single and realizing that
married APs are, in effect, allowed two accounts while a single AP is
only allowed one. I've alluded to this in previous posts, and the
fact is that's just how it is; no one said life is fair. The casino
is allowed to discriminate, and sometimes you are on the short end
and sometimes you benefit. I've learned to accept it and recommend
everyone else do the same.
Personally though, I do find umbrage with people who benefit from one
form of discrimination and then complain about another. As an
example, a married AP using a spouse's card to get max benefits on
both accounts complaining that some casinos give people with Asian
surnames added benefits. In my opinion, if you are reaping the
benefits of discrimination in one case (married vs. single) you've
lost any right to bitch about getting discriminated against in
another case (asian vs. other). I know that statement won't be
popular. But the fact is people in general tend to be oblivious to
inequities when these inequities are in their favor but are quite
vocal when they are on the short end. Hell, technically, faster
lines for higher tier cards are a form of discrimination. So while I
am neither married nor have an asian surname, I've benefited from
casino discrimination, and therefore feel no right to bitch about
it. I guess that is why I've learned to accept it. But at the same
time I certainly do enjoy pointing out inequities when I see them if
only to remind the people who are benefitting from them how fortunate
they are.
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "George Lee" <glee4ever@...> wrote:
If you not a Stations exec, why should you care?