Harry: yes, I agree, many people would want to pursue what they could gain short term and not the long term - human nature!
Remember, I'm just the messenger - I didn't write the book! The author believes the machine runs in cycles and you should tally them for a while, noting # of flushes, straights, etc. In DB he states the EV is to keep the two pair and go for the FH. He thinks if you are keeping note of how the machine is dealing, if you have seen lots of 3 of a kind, but does not give many FH, if you have QQx44, you would keep just the high pair and go for something better on the draw. If the machine is dealing lots of 4 of a kind or FH, you would keep the two pair. He further says if you have two low pair, you would keep them both.
Harry wrote:
However, there are few suggestions in video poker that are
potentially more harmful to the player than that they might
reasonably pursue alternative short-term strategies. In most cases
the modifications to strategy strongly affect short-term results in
an adverse manner.
The strategy change suggested by the book author that's noted above
is a prime example. In breaking two pair in DB to aggressively go
after quads, the player will reduce the number of valuable full
houses hit, incurring a cost that will exceed the added credits won
from a greater number of quads. Even in the short-run there's a very
large confidence that the player will wind up behind as a consequence
of such a "short-term strategy".<<< snip
···
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
