vpFREE2 Forums

need some help deciding when to go for royal

Maybe I think of it in those terms because I only have the
opportunity to hit the casinos 2 or 3 times a year. So I budget a
set amount for each of those trips and fully prepare to lose it in
the name of entertainment. So while it is all my money, if the
casino has been kind enough to add to my initial money during a trip,
I will take more risk, while as my money starts to dwindle I may get
more conservative to make it last the duration of the trip. But in
the first instance I may still be saying to myself (or my friends)
that I'm trying the $5 VP with a few Bennies since I'm playing with
the house money!

My only point to this was that when people say it's always a mistake
to think of it as the casino's money, I disagree. There are times
when thinking that way can really represent something else (a larger
bankroll for a defined period of time) that allows you to rationally
change the way you play. Not exactly the same thing as pissing away
your profits just since it is "house money", as long as the house
edge on the games you're playing doesn't change.

>
> I know what you're saying, but in some situations I like to think
of
> betting my winnings as playing with the house money. For

example,

> let's say I have $500 to play with that needs to last the day.

My

> goals are to make the $500 last and have a shot at a big win

(which

I
> might define as several thousand - which is why I'm attracted to

VP

> in the first place). So let's say that early on I hit a royal
> playing quarters for $1000. Now that I'm playing with the

casino's

> money I may step up in denomination and play a $2 machine or some
STP
> or multistrike with some of the profit to go for that "big" win.
So
> while I understand that it is now my money, the fact that it is
> profit means I see it as having a bigger bankroll and having the
> chance to take more risk in a quest for more reward.
>
> Steve

In looking at the overall picture your move to "step up in
denomination" is still being based on your overall bankroll.

But if you view it as the "casino's money", when would it become
yours? And if you had immediately gone home after hitting the royal
and returned a week later, are you still playing with the casino's
money?

It seems prudent (in a game of risk, which is ironic) to assess

your

funds as always being your money. You then determine what and how

to

play accordingly. If you hit an early royal, as in your example,

your

personal bankroll has increased. That's the determining factor in
what you choose to do next. As far as I'm concerned, the casino

where

you won exited being a part of that equation after you were paid.
After all, over the course of the year there will no doubt be

plenty

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mikeymic" <mikeymic@...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "larsonsm" <larsonsm@> wrote:
of back and forth anyway.

Once the change girl or guy puts the jackpot money in my hand, I think of it as my money.

···

--- On Tue, 1/6/09, larsonsm <larsonsm@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: larsonsm <larsonsm@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] My money vs. Casino's money
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 7:00 AM

            I know what you're saying, but in some situations I like to think of

betting my winnings as playing with the house money. For example,

let's say I have $500 to play with that needs to last the day. My

goals are to make the $500 last and have a shot at a big win (which I

might define as several thousand - which is why I'm attracted to VP

in the first place). So let's say that early on I hit a royal

playing quarters for $1000. Now that I'm playing with the casino's

money I may step up in denomination and play a $2 machine or some STP

or multistrike with some of the profit to go for that "big" win. So

while I understand that it is now my money, the fact that it is

profit means I see it as having a bigger bankroll and having the

chance to take more risk in a quest for more reward.

Steve

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups. com, "johnnyzee48127" <greeklandjohnny@ ...>

wrote:

2) 50/50 BUT IT IS ALWAYS WITH MY WINNINGS NOT

> CASINO WINNINGS.I ALWAYS AM RISKING MY MONEY NOT THEIRS.

I'm not I exactly understand what you are saying but I want to make

the point that any money you are in control of is your money,

regardless of how it got there. If I put in $20 into a dollar 9/6

JOB

machine and hit for a full house the first hand, I have $60 on the

credit meter. That is my money. If on another occassion I put $60

into a machine and don't play a single hand, that $60 is my money.

There is no house money vs my money. Whatever money I have in my

control is my money, period. How it got there doesn't really

matter.

The dangerous part of thinking about it as casino money and my

money

is that you might treat casino money as a 'gift' and be more

willing

to wager it on higher risk bets.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]