vpFREE2 Forums

MS Don & Mike's - the latest

The 100% point for 9-6 jacks is 4880 coins ($1,220 for quarters). Do not forget that unless you are declaring as a professional gambler you need to add the 3.4% IN state income tax to that calculation. Note that it took 880 coins to get the 0.456% ER addition. Also note that there are some strategy changes: AT suited is played if no penalty cards and most 3RF (Penalties are a little complicated for this!) are better than a high pair.

···

----- Original Message -----
From: jaywilly240
To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 11/15/2004 5:09:28 PM
Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest

I think it's something like this: every 100 coins added to the
progressive adds about .5 to the ER. So when the .25 progressive gets
up around $1250, it's positive.

JW

--- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@w...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern"
<howard.w.stern@e...> wrote:
> Majestic Star third floor bar 25c progressive (I think there are
seven machines) has the following base games: (In descending base ER
order)
> 9-6 jacks, 8-5 TP+, 8-6 BPD, 7-5 A+F, 7-5 BP, 150-75 OEJW (WRF and
5K), 9-5 DDB, 9-6-5 DB and 20-9 DB2s at 97.68% base ER is dead last.

Thanks for the confirmation. I knew it was bad, I just didn't know
*how* bad. Really not sure what MS is trying to accomplish with this
deployment. No reasonable person is going to play anything but JOB

on

the $.25 progressive and then only when the jackpot is at a

reasonable

level. I'm going to have to dig up the formula that indicates when

the

jackpot amount boosts JOB from 99.54 to 100%.

> That DB2 game is on 5c Multi-Strikes at the Majestic Star. Full

pay

DB2 is 25-12 (WRF and SF) and is on 25c, 50c and $1 Multi-Strike as
well as the $1 progressive at the bar. Now (I think) only seven $1

games.

Actually 8. There were 16 total $1 bartops prior to the conversion
which affected half.

I'm beginning to think there's something fishy going on with
Multi-Strike at MS. Despite the fact that I'm playing Multi-Strike
NSUD nearly perfectly (I quiz myself on Frugal regularly) and am
playing a huge number of hands, my results are actually much worse.

It

seems that since about the June timeframe Multi-Strike cycles have
become much larger than what theory indicates. I have not hit a

Royal

since April, have hit deuces only in cycles 4x expected, and even

wild

royals and 5oak are much less frequent than expected. What I'm
experiencing has ceased to be just bad luck and is now well into the
realm of the statistically suspicious. Even more significant is that
this phenomenon doesn't seem to be limited to me, I've only seen 1
jackpot win by someone else since April. Last but not least has

anyone

else noticed the sharp drop off in winners announced over the

intercom

system? I actually asked if they changed their policy regarding
announcements of winners but supposedly it has not changed. If that

is

true then why are there noticeably fewer winners now then in the

first

half of the year? Especially when the &#65007;casino&#65007; is packed and no seats
are to be found?? I'm going to take a few more stabs at Multi-Strike
but if the cycles start approaching 7x MS management and the gaming
board are going to be meeting with me to provide explanations for

what

I've observed over the course of the year.

>
> Fast Action at Harrah's E. Chicago, the four aces + low have been
hit resetting that to $3,750. (About $3920 at 10am today.) The dealt
royal was approaching $37k.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: vp_nbi
> To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: 11/12/2004 4:41:35 PM
> Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest
>
>
>
> Sometimes I should actually double check a &#65007;game&#65007; on Frugal before
> yapping about it. :slight_smile:
>
> While TDB is a much more interesting &#65007;game&#65007; than either JOB or BDLX

it

> unfortunately has an ugly side to it. In particular it has a
> sprinkling of AA strategy. Correct play often calls for the

holding of

> 3 card flushes which are neither obvious nor intuitive. There are

some

> other wrinkles as well such as holding a 4 card straight rather

than a

> pair. Suffice it to say this &#65007;game&#65007; doesn't sync well with other &#65007;

game&#65007;s

> and as a result would require a fair amount of preparation. When
> actually playing the &#65007;game&#65007; you would be forced to play much slower

to

> avoid errors which would also creep in sooner when the eyelids

start

> getting heavy. So despite it being more "interesting" it cannot be
> recommended due to the effort involved and the subsequent impact

on

> your wallet. Stick with the ubiquitous NSUD which pays better and

can

> be played at lightning speed due to a strategy which is relatively
> easy to master.
>
> --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@w...> wrote:
> >
> > Half the bar tops were converted to quarter progressive during

the

> > week. As you might guess the paytables were savaged. The only &#65007;

game&#65007;

> > that appears to be full pay is JOB. I didn't have Bonus Deuces

listed

> > on my handy paytable sheet so I don't know what sort of

percentage the

> > reduction translated to. Maybe a Bonus Deuces player like

Howard can

> > confirm. The OEJ version appears to be the 98% variety. Grrr.

The

> > progressive amount as of Thursday evening was around $1068.

When it

> > hits $2k I might bring myself to suffer the tedium of JOB. :slight_smile:
> >
> > Some of the new 100 multiplays continue to suffer button

problems. I

> > played on one of these where you had to be real careful with

the 4th

> > button, you had to press it hard and verify that the card

actually

> > held. This seems to be some sort of manufacturing defect as

opposed to

> > being a result of the environment. I played exclusively NSUD

deuces

> > which is ultra volatile. At $.05 playing 50 hands I went from

$400 up

> > to $400 down within an hour. I'm not sure why this format seems

to be

> > so much more streakier than the $.25 5-play NSUD downstairs.

Another

> > &#65007;game&#65007; I noticed on these machines is TDB (99.58%) which is only
> > slightly worse than BDLX, but slightly better than JOB. TDB

IMHO is

> > however much more interesting than either JOB or BDLX. It's a

pity

> > they didn't put SDB or TB+ on these machines as they are both

superior

> > to TDB, but I might take a stab at TDB anyway if I get

saturated with

> > NSUD.
> >
> > Some of the Multi-Strike machines seemed to exhibit static

problems.

> > Cards would sporadically hold or clear on their own without a
> > corresponding button push. Technicians were summoned to take a

look

> > but I'm not sure they solved the problem. At any rate be

careful when

> > playing these machines.
>
>
>
>
>
> vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE_Chicago/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vpFREE_Chicago-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service.

>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE_Chicago/
  
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vpFREE_Chicago-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thanks for providing a more precise JOB progressive break even
target, (and of course for reminding us to be aware of the annoying
taxman cut). By the way, the rule of thumb I offered should be 1000
coins per .5 of ER, not 100, as I previously suggested. (This is what
happens when your fingers are too thick for the keyboard).

JW

--- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern"
<howard.w.stern@e...> wrote:

The 100% point for 9-6 jacks is 4880 coins ($1,220 for quarters).

Do not forget that unless you are declaring as a professional gambler
you need to add the 3.4% IN state income tax to that calculation.
Note that it took 880 coins to get the 0.456% ER addition. Also note
that there are some strategy changes: AT suited is played if no
penalty cards and most 3RF (Penalties are a little complicated for
this!) are better than a high pair.

From: jaywilly240
To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 11/15/2004 5:09:28 PM
Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest

I think it's something like this: every 100 coins added to the
progressive adds about .5 to the ER. So when the .25 progressive

gets

up around $1250, it's positive.

JW

>
> --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern"
> <howard.w.stern@e...> wrote:
> > Majestic Star third floor bar 25c progressive (I think there are
> seven machines) has the following base games: (In descending base

ER

> order)
> > 9-6 jacks, 8-5 TP+, 8-6 BPD, 7-5 A+F, 7-5 BP, 150-75 OEJW (WRF

and

> 5K), 9-5 DDB, 9-6-5 DB and 20-9 DB2s at 97.68% base ER is dead

last.

>
> Thanks for the confirmation. I knew it was bad, I just didn't know
> *how* bad. Really not sure what MS is trying to accomplish with

this

> deployment. No reasonable person is going to play anything but

JOB

on
> the $.25 progressive and then only when the jackpot is at a
reasonable
> level. I'm going to have to dig up the formula that indicates

when

the
> jackpot amount boosts JOB from 99.54 to 100%.
>
> > That DB2 game is on 5c Multi-Strikes at the Majestic Star. Full
pay
> DB2 is 25-12 (WRF and SF) and is on 25c, 50c and $1 Multi-Strike

as

> well as the $1 progressive at the bar. Now (I think) only seven

$1

games.
>
> Actually 8. There were 16 total $1 bartops prior to the conversion
> which affected half.
>
> I'm beginning to think there's something fishy going on with
> Multi-Strike at MS. Despite the fact that I'm playing Multi-Strike
> NSUD nearly perfectly (I quiz myself on Frugal regularly) and am
> playing a huge number of hands, my results are actually much

worse.

It
> seems that since about the June timeframe Multi-Strike cycles have
> become much larger than what theory indicates. I have not hit a
Royal
> since April, have hit deuces only in cycles 4x expected, and even
wild
> royals and 5oak are much less frequent than expected. What I'm
> experiencing has ceased to be just bad luck and is now well into

the

> realm of the statistically suspicious. Even more significant is

that

> this phenomenon doesn't seem to be limited to me, I've only seen 1
> jackpot win by someone else since April. Last but not least has
anyone
> else noticed the sharp drop off in winners announced over the
intercom
> system? I actually asked if they changed their policy regarding
> announcements of winners but supposedly it has not changed. If

that

is
> true then why are there noticeably fewer winners now then in the
first
> half of the year? Especially when the &#65007;&#65007;casino&#65007;&#65007; is

packed and no seats

> are to be found?? I'm going to take a few more stabs at Multi-

Strike

> but if the cycles start approaching 7x MS management and the

gaming

> board are going to be meeting with me to provide explanations for
what
> I've observed over the course of the year.
>
> >
> > Fast Action at Harrah's E. Chicago, the four aces + low have

been

> hit resetting that to $3,750. (About $3920 at 10am today.) The

dealt

> royal was approaching $37k.
> >
> >
> > From: vp_nbi
> > To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: 11/12/2004 4:41:35 PM
> > Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest
> >
> >
> >
> > Sometimes I should actually double check a &#65007;&#65007;game&#65007;&#65007;

on Frugal before

> > yapping about it. :slight_smile:
> >
> > While TDB is a much more interesting &#65007;game&#65007; than

either JOB or BDLX

it
> > unfortunately has an ugly side to it. In particular it has a
> > sprinkling of AA strategy. Correct play often calls for the
holding of
> > 3 card flushes which are neither obvious nor intuitive. There

are

some
> > other wrinkles as well such as holding a 4 card straight rather
than a
> > pair. Suffice it to say this &#65007;game&#65007; doesn't sync

well with other &#65007;

game&#65007;s
> > and as a result would require a fair amount of preparation. When
> > actually playing the &#65007;game&#65007; you would be forced

to play much slower

to
> > avoid errors which would also creep in sooner when the eyelids
start
> > getting heavy. So despite it being more "interesting" it cannot

be

> > recommended due to the effort involved and the subsequent

impact

on
> > your wallet. Stick with the ubiquitous NSUD which pays better

and

can
> > be played at lightning speed due to a strategy which is

relatively

> > easy to master.
> >
> > --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@w...>

wrote:

> > >
> > > Half the bar tops were converted to quarter progressive

during

the
> > > week. As you might guess the paytables were savaged. The only

&#65007;

game&#65007;
> > > that appears to be full pay is JOB. I didn't have Bonus

Deuces

listed
> > > on my handy paytable sheet so I don't know what sort of
percentage the
> > > reduction translated to. Maybe a Bonus Deuces player like
Howard can
> > > confirm. The OEJ version appears to be the 98% variety. Grrr.
The
> > > progressive amount as of Thursday evening was around $1068.
When it
> > > hits $2k I might bring myself to suffer the tedium of JOB. :slight_smile:
> > >
> > > Some of the new 100 multiplays continue to suffer button
problems. I
> > > played on one of these where you had to be real careful with
the 4th
> > > button, you had to press it hard and verify that the card
actually
> > > held. This seems to be some sort of manufacturing defect as
opposed to
> > > being a result of the environment. I played exclusively NSUD
deuces
> > > which is ultra volatile. At $.05 playing 50 hands I went from
$400 up
> > > to $400 down within an hour. I'm not sure why this format

seems

to be
> > > so much more streakier than the $.25 5-play NSUD downstairs.
Another
> > > &#65007;game&#65007; I noticed on these machines is TDB

(99.58%) which is only

> > > slightly worse than BDLX, but slightly better than JOB. TDB
IMHO is
> > > however much more interesting than either JOB or BDLX. It's a
pity
> > > they didn't put SDB or TB+ on these machines as they are both
superior
> > > to TDB, but I might take a stab at TDB anyway if I get
saturated with
> > > NSUD.
> > >
> > > Some of the Multi-Strike machines seemed to exhibit static
problems.
> > > Cards would sporadically hold or clear on their own without a
> > > corresponding button push. Technicians were summoned to take

a

look
> > > but I'm not sure they solved the problem. At any rate be
careful when
> > > playing these machines.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE_Chicago/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > vpFREE_Chicago-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE_Chicago/
  
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vpFREE_Chicago-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service.

···

----- Original Message -----
--- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@w...> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

The quarter progressive at don and mike's as of 2:30PM on 11/17 was $2012.00
Illinois JIM

···

From: "jaywilly240" <wha724@comcast.net>
Reply-To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:07:49 -0000

Thanks for providing a more precise JOB progressive break even
target, (and of course for reminding us to be aware of the annoying
taxman cut). By the way, the rule of thumb I offered should be 1000
coins per .5 of ER, not 100, as I previously suggested. (This is what
happens when your fingers are too thick for the keyboard).

JW

--- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern"
<howard.w.stern@e...> wrote:
> The 100% point for 9-6 jacks is 4880 coins ($1,220 for quarters).
Do not forget that unless you are declaring as a professional gambler
you need to add the 3.4% IN state income tax to that calculation.
Note that it took 880 coins to get the 0.456% ER addition. Also note
that there are some strategy changes: AT suited is played if no
penalty cards and most 3RF (Penalties are a little complicated for
this!) are better than a high pair.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jaywilly240
> To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: 11/15/2004 5:09:28 PM
> Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest
>
> I think it's something like this: every 100 coins added to the
> progressive adds about .5 to the ER. So when the .25 progressive
gets
> up around $1250, it's positive.
>
> JW
>
> --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@w...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern"
> > <howard.w.stern@e...> wrote:
> > > Majestic Star third floor bar 25c progressive (I think there are
> > seven machines) has the following base games: (In descending base
ER
> > order)
> > > 9-6 jacks, 8-5 TP+, 8-6 BPD, 7-5 A+F, 7-5 BP, 150-75 OEJW (WRF
and
> > 5K), 9-5 DDB, 9-6-5 DB and 20-9 DB2s at 97.68% base ER is dead
last.
> >
> > Thanks for the confirmation. I knew it was bad, I just didn't know
> > *how* bad. Really not sure what MS is trying to accomplish with
this
> > deployment. No reasonable person is going to play anything but
JOB
> on
> > the $.25 progressive and then only when the jackpot is at a
> reasonable
> > level. I'm going to have to dig up the formula that indicates
when
> the
> > jackpot amount boosts JOB from 99.54 to 100%.
> >
> > > That DB2 game is on 5c Multi-Strikes at the Majestic Star. Full
> pay
> > DB2 is 25-12 (WRF and SF) and is on 25c, 50c and $1 Multi-Strike
as
> > well as the $1 progressive at the bar. Now (I think) only seven
$1
> games.
> >
> > Actually 8. There were 16 total $1 bartops prior to the conversion
> > which affected half.
> >
> > I'm beginning to think there's something fishy going on with
> > Multi-Strike at MS. Despite the fact that I'm playing Multi-Strike
> > NSUD nearly perfectly (I quiz myself on Frugal regularly) and am
> > playing a huge number of hands, my results are actually much
worse.
> It
> > seems that since about the June timeframe Multi-Strike cycles have
> > become much larger than what theory indicates. I have not hit a
> Royal
> > since April, have hit deuces only in cycles 4x expected, and even
> wild
> > royals and 5oak are much less frequent than expected. What I'm
> > experiencing has ceased to be just bad luck and is now well into
the
> > realm of the statistically suspicious. Even more significant is
that
> > this phenomenon doesn't seem to be limited to me, I've only seen 1
> > jackpot win by someone else since April. Last but not least has
> anyone
> > else noticed the sharp drop off in winners announced over the
> intercom
> > system? I actually asked if they changed their policy regarding
> > announcements of winners but supposedly it has not changed. If
that
> is
> > true then why are there noticeably fewer winners now then in the
> first
> > half of the year? Especially when the ??casino?? is
packed and no seats
> > are to be found?? I'm going to take a few more stabs at Multi-
Strike
> > but if the cycles start approaching 7x MS management and the
gaming
> > board are going to be meeting with me to provide explanations for
> what
> > I've observed over the course of the year.
> >
> > >
> > > Fast Action at Harrah's E. Chicago, the four aces + low have
been
> > hit resetting that to $3,750. (About $3920 at 10am today.) The
dealt
> > royal was approaching $37k.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: vp_nbi
> > > To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: 11/12/2004 4:41:35 PM
> > > Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest
> > >
> > > Sometimes I should actually double check a ??game??
on Frugal before
> > > yapping about it. :slight_smile:
> > >
> > > While TDB is a much more interesting ?game? than
either JOB or BDLX
> it
> > > unfortunately has an ugly side to it. In particular it has a
> > > sprinkling of AA strategy. Correct play often calls for the
> holding of
> > > 3 card flushes which are neither obvious nor intuitive. There
are
> some
> > > other wrinkles as well such as holding a 4 card straight rather
> than a
> > > pair. Suffice it to say this ?game? doesn't sync
well with other ?
> game?s
> > > and as a result would require a fair amount of preparation. When
> > > actually playing the ?game? you would be forced
to play much slower
> to
> > > avoid errors which would also creep in sooner when the eyelids
> start
> > > getting heavy. So despite it being more "interesting" it cannot
be
> > > recommended due to the effort involved and the subsequent
impact
> on
> > > your wallet. Stick with the ubiquitous NSUD which pays better
and
> can
> > > be played at lightning speed due to a strategy which is
relatively
> > > easy to master.
> > >
> > > --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@w...>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Half the bar tops were converted to quarter progressive
during
> the
> > > > week. As you might guess the paytables were savaged. The only
?
> game?
> > > > that appears to be full pay is JOB. I didn't have Bonus
Deuces
> listed
> > > > on my handy paytable sheet so I don't know what sort of
> percentage the
> > > > reduction translated to. Maybe a Bonus Deuces player like
> Howard can
> > > > confirm. The OEJ version appears to be the 98% variety. Grrr.
> The
> > > > progressive amount as of Thursday evening was around $1068.
> When it
> > > > hits $2k I might bring myself to suffer the tedium of JOB. :slight_smile:
> > > >
> > > > Some of the new 100 multiplays continue to suffer button
> problems. I
> > > > played on one of these where you had to be real careful with
> the 4th
> > > > button, you had to press it hard and verify that the card
> actually
> > > > held. This seems to be some sort of manufacturing defect as
> opposed to
> > > > being a result of the environment. I played exclusively NSUD
> deuces
> > > > which is ultra volatile. At $.05 playing 50 hands I went from
> $400 up
> > > > to $400 down within an hour. I'm not sure why this format
seems
> to be
> > > > so much more streakier than the $.25 5-play NSUD downstairs.
> Another
> > > > ?game? I noticed on these machines is TDB
(99.58%) which is only
> > > > slightly worse than BDLX, but slightly better than JOB. TDB
> IMHO is
> > > > however much more interesting than either JOB or BDLX. It's a
> pity
> > > > they didn't put SDB or TB+ on these machines as they are both
> superior
> > > > to TDB, but I might take a stab at TDB anyway if I get
> saturated with
> > > > NSUD.
> > > >
> > > > Some of the Multi-Strike machines seemed to exhibit static
> problems.
> > > > Cards would sporadically hold or clear on their own without a
> > > > corresponding button push. Technicians were summoned to take
a
> look
> > > > but I'm not sure they solved the problem. At any rate be
> careful when
> > > > playing these machines.
> > >
> > > vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE_Chicago/
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > vpFREE_Chicago-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE_Chicago/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vpFREE_Chicago-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CORRECTION:
The 25 cent progressive at don and mike's as of 2:30pm on 11/17 was $1212.
My previous post was incorrect.
Illinois JIM

···

From: "jaywilly240" <wha724@comcast.net>
Reply-To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:07:49 -0000

Thanks for providing a more precise JOB progressive break even
target, (and of course for reminding us to be aware of the annoying
taxman cut). By the way, the rule of thumb I offered should be 1000
coins per .5 of ER, not 100, as I previously suggested. (This is what
happens when your fingers are too thick for the keyboard).

JW

--- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern"
<howard.w.stern@e...> wrote:
> The 100% point for 9-6 jacks is 4880 coins ($1,220 for quarters).
Do not forget that unless you are declaring as a professional gambler
you need to add the 3.4% IN state income tax to that calculation.
Note that it took 880 coins to get the 0.456% ER addition. Also note
that there are some strategy changes: AT suited is played if no
penalty cards and most 3RF (Penalties are a little complicated for
this!) are better than a high pair.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jaywilly240
> To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: 11/15/2004 5:09:28 PM
> Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest
>
> I think it's something like this: every 100 coins added to the
> progressive adds about .5 to the ER. So when the .25 progressive
gets
> up around $1250, it's positive.
>
> JW
>
> --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@w...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern"
> > <howard.w.stern@e...> wrote:
> > > Majestic Star third floor bar 25c progressive (I think there are
> > seven machines) has the following base games: (In descending base
ER
> > order)
> > > 9-6 jacks, 8-5 TP+, 8-6 BPD, 7-5 A+F, 7-5 BP, 150-75 OEJW (WRF
and
> > 5K), 9-5 DDB, 9-6-5 DB and 20-9 DB2s at 97.68% base ER is dead
last.
> >
> > Thanks for the confirmation. I knew it was bad, I just didn't know
> > *how* bad. Really not sure what MS is trying to accomplish with
this
> > deployment. No reasonable person is going to play anything but
JOB
> on
> > the $.25 progressive and then only when the jackpot is at a
> reasonable
> > level. I'm going to have to dig up the formula that indicates
when
> the
> > jackpot amount boosts JOB from 99.54 to 100%.
> >
> > > That DB2 game is on 5c Multi-Strikes at the Majestic Star. Full
> pay
> > DB2 is 25-12 (WRF and SF) and is on 25c, 50c and $1 Multi-Strike
as
> > well as the $1 progressive at the bar. Now (I think) only seven
$1
> games.
> >
> > Actually 8. There were 16 total $1 bartops prior to the conversion
> > which affected half.
> >
> > I'm beginning to think there's something fishy going on with
> > Multi-Strike at MS. Despite the fact that I'm playing Multi-Strike
> > NSUD nearly perfectly (I quiz myself on Frugal regularly) and am
> > playing a huge number of hands, my results are actually much
worse.
> It
> > seems that since about the June timeframe Multi-Strike cycles have
> > become much larger than what theory indicates. I have not hit a
> Royal
> > since April, have hit deuces only in cycles 4x expected, and even
> wild
> > royals and 5oak are much less frequent than expected. What I'm
> > experiencing has ceased to be just bad luck and is now well into
the
> > realm of the statistically suspicious. Even more significant is
that
> > this phenomenon doesn't seem to be limited to me, I've only seen 1
> > jackpot win by someone else since April. Last but not least has
> anyone
> > else noticed the sharp drop off in winners announced over the
> intercom
> > system? I actually asked if they changed their policy regarding
> > announcements of winners but supposedly it has not changed. If
that
> is
> > true then why are there noticeably fewer winners now then in the
> first
> > half of the year? Especially when the ??casino?? is
packed and no seats
> > are to be found?? I'm going to take a few more stabs at Multi-
Strike
> > but if the cycles start approaching 7x MS management and the
gaming
> > board are going to be meeting with me to provide explanations for
> what
> > I've observed over the course of the year.
> >
> > >
> > > Fast Action at Harrah's E. Chicago, the four aces + low have
been
> > hit resetting that to $3,750. (About $3920 at 10am today.) The
dealt
> > royal was approaching $37k.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: vp_nbi
> > > To: vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: 11/12/2004 4:41:35 PM
> > > Subject: [vpFREE_Chicago] Re: MS Don & Mike's - the latest
> > >
> > > Sometimes I should actually double check a ??game??
on Frugal before
> > > yapping about it. :slight_smile:
> > >
> > > While TDB is a much more interesting ?game? than
either JOB or BDLX
> it
> > > unfortunately has an ugly side to it. In particular it has a
> > > sprinkling of AA strategy. Correct play often calls for the
> holding of
> > > 3 card flushes which are neither obvious nor intuitive. There
are
> some
> > > other wrinkles as well such as holding a 4 card straight rather
> than a
> > > pair. Suffice it to say this ?game? doesn't sync
well with other ?
> game?s
> > > and as a result would require a fair amount of preparation. When
> > > actually playing the ?game? you would be forced
to play much slower
> to
> > > avoid errors which would also creep in sooner when the eyelids
> start
> > > getting heavy. So despite it being more "interesting" it cannot
be
> > > recommended due to the effort involved and the subsequent
impact
> on
> > > your wallet. Stick with the ubiquitous NSUD which pays better
and
> can
> > > be played at lightning speed due to a strategy which is
relatively
> > > easy to master.
> > >
> > > --- In vpFREE_Chicago@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@w...>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Half the bar tops were converted to quarter progressive
during
> the
> > > > week. As you might guess the paytables were savaged. The only
?
> game?
> > > > that appears to be full pay is JOB. I didn't have Bonus
Deuces
> listed
> > > > on my handy paytable sheet so I don't know what sort of
> percentage the
> > > > reduction translated to. Maybe a Bonus Deuces player like
> Howard can
> > > > confirm. The OEJ version appears to be the 98% variety. Grrr.
> The
> > > > progressive amount as of Thursday evening was around $1068.
> When it
> > > > hits $2k I might bring myself to suffer the tedium of JOB. :slight_smile:
> > > >
> > > > Some of the new 100 multiplays continue to suffer button
> problems. I
> > > > played on one of these where you had to be real careful with
> the 4th
> > > > button, you had to press it hard and verify that the card
> actually
> > > > held. This seems to be some sort of manufacturing defect as
> opposed to
> > > > being a result of the environment. I played exclusively NSUD
> deuces
> > > > which is ultra volatile. At $.05 playing 50 hands I went from
> $400 up
> > > > to $400 down within an hour. I'm not sure why this format
seems
> to be
> > > > so much more streakier than the $.25 5-play NSUD downstairs.
> Another
> > > > ?game? I noticed on these machines is TDB
(99.58%) which is only
> > > > slightly worse than BDLX, but slightly better than JOB. TDB
> IMHO is
> > > > however much more interesting than either JOB or BDLX. It's a
> pity
> > > > they didn't put SDB or TB+ on these machines as they are both
> superior
> > > > to TDB, but I might take a stab at TDB anyway if I get
> saturated with
> > > > NSUD.
> > > >
> > > > Some of the Multi-Strike machines seemed to exhibit static
> problems.
> > > > Cards would sporadically hold or clear on their own without a
> > > > corresponding button push. Technicians were summoned to take
a
> look
> > > > but I'm not sure they solved the problem. At any rate be
> careful when
> > > > playing these machines.
> > >
> > > vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE_Chicago/
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > vpFREE_Chicago-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE_Chicago/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vpFREE_Chicago-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]