Russ,
The middle xxxfingerxxx I mean middle card first deal is annoying
unless you play the machines exlusivley. Then it becomes standard
operating procedure after about a few sessions.
Since the middle deal is the same on both the slant tops and the
uprights, I cannot attribute observed jackpot discrepancy on error
making. Its ancedotal with perhaps 30 hours on slantops and 20 hours
on uprights. I'm getting pissed, as well, with this four month losing
streak. Also, where are all the regular AP gamblers? Busted, Atlantic
City, at the JB machines or best of all - increased bankroll so
playing the $5
?
haaljo in Boston
--- In vpFREE_NewEngland@yahoogroups.com, "russwin1" <russwin1@...>
wrote:
Man I hope you are not correct about the machines being gaffed. I
found I was making mistakes and had to really slow down my play on
the .25 slant tops, so much so I stopped playing, it was too
anoying.
Maybe mistakes were causing the # of quads to go down. -Russ
>
> Since the changes to the machines with the middle card dealt
first,
> Our observations are:
> 1) Uprights, machines busy normal distribution of quads and even
a SF
> observed.
> 2) Slanttops, machines busy, Nobody getting quads and certainly
no SF.
>
> Just the random walk of the law of big numbers? Or is Mohegan
doing a
> test comparing action on gaffed machines versus fair deal
machines.
> I believe this happened and is documented in a VP book. Think it
was
···
--- In vpFREE_NewEngland@yahoogroups.com, "haaljo" <haaljo@> wrote:
at
> the Cherokee casino in North Carolina 10 years or so ago.
> haaljo in Boston
>