vpFREE2 Forums

Mr. Dancer's writings.

#1

I'm sorry I lost the message from the person who asked me why I might question some of Mr. Dancers writings. I've always read his articles with interestand sometimes see a little bragging. I believe he does sensationalize (and he certainly has earned that right) in my opinion. That's not why I may not 100%trust what he says though. His winning streak began by taking a chance on a $500 machine i think, and he teaches never to do that. I would quickly apologize if he mentions that in his book which i hope to have here this week. Steve, did he say anything about that or explain why he went off his strict disipline of bankroll rqmts? thank you, Valerie

···

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

#2

I remember reading an article that Bob wrote last year in either
Strictly Slots or Casino Player about taking "Pot Shots". I think
that he tied in some of his own pot shots that turned out rather
lucky. In the context of your comments, Valerie I would love to
reread that article now.

-Larry

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Valerie Polito" <casinogal23@h...>
wrote:

I'm sorry I lost the message from the person who asked me why I

might

question some of Mr. Dancers writings. I've always read his

articles with

interestand sometimes see a little bragging. I believe he does
sensationalize (and he certainly has earned that right) in my

opinion.

That's not why I may not 100%trust what he says though. His

winning streak

began by taking a chance on a $500 machine i think, and he teaches

never to

do that. I would quickly apologize if he mentions that in his book

which i

hope to have here this week. Steve, did he say anything about that

or

explain why he went off his strict disipline of bankroll rqmts?

thank you,

···

Valerie

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

#3

imo the post below mischaracterizes dancer's writings. in short,
dancer does not teach "never" to play a high denomination machine.
he teaches to play within your bankroll. dancer has written that his
bankroll is sufficient to play $25 and more vp. ($25 royal =
$100,000; $100 royal = $400,000) imo the post below assumes with no
factual support and without reading dancer's book that "he went off
his strict disipline [sic] of bankroll rqmts."

is bankroll the sole reason the poster below does not trust what
dancer says?

here is a relevant dancer column:
http://www.casinogaming.com/columnists/dancer/062601.html

Frank
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Valerie Polito" <casinogal23@h...>
wrote:

I'm sorry I lost the message from the person who asked me why I

might

question some of Mr. Dancers writings. I've always read his

articles with

interestand sometimes see a little bragging. I believe he does
sensationalize (and he certainly has earned that right) in my

opinion.

That's not why I may not 100%trust what he says though. His

winning streak

began by taking a chance on a $500 machine i think, and he teaches

never to

do that. I would quickly apologize if he mentions that in his book

which i

hope to have here this week. Steve, did he say anything about that

or

explain why he went off his strict disipline of bankroll rqmts?

thank you,

···

Valerie