vpFREE2 Forums

More WI casino info - Majestic Pines - Black River Falls

One note about Minnesota: They have a law limiting VP games to 98% or less!

···

----- Original Message -----
From: vppappy
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 8/7/2003 9:29:42 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: More WI casino info - Majestic Pines - Black River Falls

   I have a few articles up on midwestcasinoguide.com about some of
the Wisconsin casinos, as well as a few in Michigan and Minnesota.
Check out "VP DOES VP IN DA UP-MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN TOO"

   "If white man speaks with forked tongue, then red man speaks with
forked casino."
                  --VP Pappy

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/a7ga

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Yes, that is true. It is not really a law but part of the compact
signed with the tribes. And, the compact is not strictly enforced.
There are machines over 98%, over 99% and over 100%!

Dick

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Stern" <howard.w.stern@e...>
wrote:

One note about Minnesota: They have a law limiting VP games to 98%

or less!

From: vppappy
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 8/7/2003 9:29:42 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: More WI casino info - Majestic Pines - Black

River Falls

   I have a few articles up on midwestcasinoguide.com about some of
the Wisconsin casinos, as well as a few in Michigan and Minnesota.
Check out "VP DOES VP IN DA UP-MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN TOO"

   "If white man speaks with forked tongue, then red man speaks

with

forked casino."
                  --VP Pappy

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/a7ga

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service.

···

----- Original Message -----

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

rgmustain wrote:

Yes, that is true. It is not really a law but part of the compact
signed with the tribes. And, the compact is not strictly enforced.
There are machines over 98%, over 99% and over 100%!

Is there any substantiation for that assertion, preferably one that is
independently corroborated?