Agree 100% on not bringing it up -- definitely not worth it. Just
thought it was strange that I haven't gotten one considering my
play. Thanks for the response.
--- In vpFREE_NewEngland@yahoogroups.com, "haaljo" <haaljo@y...>
wrote:
There is no rhyme or reason to achieving Sagamore. I would suggest
you
keep a low profile on this matter. Eventually, you will get a
Sagamore
Card under the existing system. It takes at least three months once
the computer says you are Sagamore.
You may casually inquire at the lounge when the loungelings swipe
your
card for entrance - if you are rated Sagamore. Other than that, the
benfits do not outweight staying under the radar in our opinion.
Haaljo in Boston
--- In vpFREE_NewEngland@yahoogroups.com, "billkennedy3"
<billkennedy3@y...> wrote:
>
> I received a $50 gas card in Sept, but nothing in Oct (I actually
> didn't get any promotional material at all from MS in Oct). I
used
> the gas card maybe 3 times in Sept, but I also gave them about
> $300,000 coin-in on VP during the month. Some of my friends that
> didn't play at all during Sept got things like $15/week food
vouchers.
>
> On a side note, I started playing at MS in June, and have given
them
> about $1.2 million in VP coin-in (and I'm actually up a bit!),
plus
> maybe 10-12 hours of $75-$100 BJ play (I keep VERY detailed VP
> records). I STILL don't have a Sagamore card -- anyone know what
it
> takes to get one of these?? Is it based on actual loss? I can't
> imagine many people play more than I do, so I'm thinking that the
> fact that I haven't lost anything yet might have something to do
with
> it.
>
>
>
> --- In vpFREE_NewEngland@yahoogroups.com, "jack_bravo"
<jb1805@m...>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't think I put enough $ through to be on the better side
of
> the
> > comp system. I was happy with my $15 card naively thinking
that's
> > what everyone received. I was surprised when I saw someone with
a
> $25
> > and another with a $50 gas card although, in retrospect, not
really
···
> > --- In vpFREE_NewEngland@yahoogroups.com, joel0457@a... wrote:
> > that surprised.
> >
> > Jack