MIS-STATE OF THE UNION---OJ innocent?

[Trudy]

In a message dated 2/4/2006 10:14:51 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
vp_mavin@yahoo.com writes:

I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on the loss of his daughter.
That was an awful way to die, regardless of her lifestyle. But his
obsession with making believe it was OJ who dunnit after he was
acquitted unanimously fully sours any respect one should have for
that man. He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a money-making
machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions.

I'm beginning to understand why you think OJ is innocent, you were
overwhelmed and confused by the evidence.

Fred G. lost his SON not his Daughter.

BTW, guilty people are frequently found "not guilt" in our system
because our system is based on the premise that it it better to let 9
guilty people go free than to imprison 1 innocent person. that doesn't
mean that intelligent people can't draw their own conclusions of guilt
or innocence.

"He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a money-making
machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions."

Have you no shame, that is a disgraceful thing to say, even on Free^2.

   WELL, a civil court agreed that OJ caused the deaths and an award was
given to the families, but it will never be collected, but that is some
validation for the families that lost two loved ones.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

[Rob_Singer1]

I'm beginning to understand why you think OJ is innocent, you were
overwhelmed and confused by the evidence.

Yup, but I guess not as much "confusion and being overwhelmed" as the
jury depicted, am I right? You OJ-haters will say anything to have it
your make-believe way when you know it's wrong and it'll never be
that way.

"He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a money-making
machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions."

WELL, a civil court agreed that OJ caused the deaths and an award

was given to the families, but it will never be collected, but that
is some validation for the families that lost two loved ones.

That's just the point--He's found innocent of all charges in the
first hearing, but then they give the money-grubbing Fred G. a second
opportunity to try to get OJ's money, thus the civil case, where no
unanimous decision is required by a set of different people. That's
why I mockled that nonsense earlier by saying there should be a
third, less stringent trial so Fred coulsd at least throw a pie at
OJ. Regardless, there is NO more fitting an epitaph to all this than
to see Fred Goldman taste OJ's money without ever being able to get
his disgraceful hands on it. God Bless America!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vaycaymom@... wrote: