vpFREE2 Forums

MIS-STATE OF THE UNION---OJ innocent?

#1

This was not written to me, but I would also say that besides facts, the
jury must follow certain instructions, that has just as weight when it comes to
the verdict.

And in an interesting sidenote.. Fred Goldberg (I think that is his last
name) father of Ron, the other victims, lives and works in my area. I see him
often and he has helped me on occasion. I feel for him, his face is so familiar
to all, so many people must react the same way I did the first time I ran
into him.
Trudy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#2

I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on the loss of his daughter.
That was an awful way to die, regardless of her lifestyle. But his
obsession with making believe it was OJ who dunnit after he was
acquitted unanimously fully sours any respect one should have for
that man. He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a money-making
machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions.

This was not written to me, but I would also say that besides

facts, the

jury must follow certain instructions, that has just as weight when

it comes to

the verdict.

And in an interesting sidenote.. Fred Goldberg (I think that is his

last

name) father of Ron, the other victims, lives and works in my area.

I see him

often and he has helped me on occasion. I feel for him, his face is

so familiar

to all, so many people must react the same way I did the first time

I ran

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vaycaymom@... wrote:

into him.
Trudy

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#3

I'm beginning to understand why you think OJ is innocent, you were
overwhelmed and confused by the evidence.

Fred G. lost his SON not his Daughter.

BTW, guilty people are frequently found "not guilt" in our system
because our system is based on the premise that it it better to let 9
guilty people go free than to imprison 1 innocent person. that doesn't
mean that intelligent people can't draw their own conclusions of guilt
or innocence.

"He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a money-making
machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions."

Have you no shame, that is a disgraceful thing to say, even on Free^2.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on the loss of his daughter.
That was an awful way to die, regardless of her lifestyle. But his
obsession with making believe it was OJ who dunnit after he was
acquitted unanimously fully sours any respect one should have for
that man. He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a money-making
machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions.

#4

Fred G. lost his SON not his Daughter.

Yes. We tend to forget the normal people when the famous are involved.

BTW, guilty people are frequently found "not guilt" in our system
because our system is based on the premise that it it better to let
guilty people go free than to imprison 1 innocent person. that

doesn't mean that intelligent people can't draw their own conclusions
of guilt or innocence.

That opinion's very loose and I'd doubt you'd find any learned legal
experts or law enforcement professionals who'd agree with such a
statement. What you're saying is the system never has and never will
work, and that's overwhelmingly not the case.

"He's tried to turn his son's death into a money-making
machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions."

Have you no shame, that is a disgraceful thing to say, even on

Free^2.

It's 100% true as you know. And it's his own fault for carrying on
and on and on about it and the money all the time. Sure his son was
murdered by SOMEONE other than OJ, and the guy just can't accept the
verdict. That's his problem, and if people had listened to OJ during
the very lengthy trial maybe the police would have concentreated
their efforts on finding the real killer or killers instead of them
all trying to make a name for themselves with what turned out to be
wrongly crucifying OJ. Fred G. has no one to blame but his greedy,
greedy self, as he marches to the beat of a money-making drum that
echoes with the putrid sound of misplaced revenge.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_mavin" <vp_mavin@...> wrote:

#5

I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on the loss of his daughter.
That was an awful way to die, regardless of her lifestyle.

ROTFLMAO. Is this too much, or what? Robbie, the know-it-all, thinks OJ
killed a women! Stop it, my sides are hurting. Just as he was starting
to on and on like some kind of an expert, he sticks his foot in his
mouth AGAIN. Please, Robbie, tell us who killed OJs wife since you know
so much. Next thing you know he'll be going on about OJs professional
baseball career. Whew, this is tooooooooooo funny.

But his
obsession with making believe it was OJ who dunnit after he was
acquitted unanimously fully sours any respect one should have for
that man. He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a money-making
machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions.

Sounds like another self-depiction. Would Robbie try to turn a scam
system into anything?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

#6

Sorry little dicky--you're a day late and a dollar short as usual on
this one!

>
> I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on the loss of his daughter.
> That was an awful way to die, regardless of her lifestyle.

ROTFLMAO. Is this too much, or what? Robbie, the know-it-all,

thinks OJ

killed a women! Stop it, my sides are hurting. Just as he was

starting

to on and on like some kind of an expert, he sticks his foot in his
mouth AGAIN. Please, Robbie, tell us who killed OJs wife since you

know

so much. Next thing you know he'll be going on about OJs

professional

baseball career. Whew, this is tooooooooooo funny.

> But his
> obsession with making believe it was OJ who dunnit after he was
> acquitted unanimously fully sours any respect one should have for
> that man. He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a money-

making

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful actions.

Sounds like another self-depiction. Would Robbie try to turn a scam
system into anything?

#7

Nothing to be sorry about, dufus. You gave us all a great big laugh and
made yourself look foolish. What could be better.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

Sorry little dicky--you're a day late and a dollar short as usual on
this one!

#8

and made yourself look foolish. What could be better.

Looks like the laugh's on you, as usual! Next time see if you can keep
up with the rest of the 'us's' before you stub your toe please.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

Nothing to be sorry about, dufus. You gave us all a great big laugh

#9

> Nothing to be sorry about, dufus. You gave us all a great big laugh
and made yourself look foolish. What could be better.

Looks like the laugh's on you, as usual! Next time see if you can

keep

up with the rest of the 'us's' before you stub your toe please.

You mean the two other posters that had already pointed out your
monsterous faux pas? Of course, I saw them. I just couldn't resist the
urge to point it out one more time.

Now, even one more time ... could you tell us again about the daughter
OJ murdered? ROTFLMAO.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#10

>
> > Nothing to be sorry about, dufus. You gave us all a great big

laugh

> and made yourself look foolish. What could be better.
>
> Looks like the laugh's on you, as usual! Next time see if you can
keep
> up with the rest of the 'us's' before you stub your toe please.
>

You mean the two other posters that had already pointed out your
monsterous faux pas? Of course, I saw them. I just couldn't resist

the urge to point it out one more time.

Now, even one more time ... could you tell us again about the

daughter OJ murdered? ROTFLMAO.

Yes. Nicole Simpson was a daughter but murdered by someone other than
OJ, obviously. HAHAHAHAHA!!! You bit into that one but GOOD!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#11

rsing1111 wrote:

I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on the loss of his daughter.
That was an awful way to die, regardless of her lifestyle. But his
obsession with making believe it was OJ who dunnit after he was
acquitted unanimously fully sours any respect one should have for
that man. He's tried to turn his daughter's death into a
money-making machine, and he should be ashamed for his disgraceful
actions.

I can't say that I periodically tune into the discussion here with the
same fascination of a passerby craning his/her neck to view a traffic
accident, but it's the best analogy that comes to mind.

What I've seen expressed by Rob in this installment (the above text
and preceding posts) astounds me, on numerous counts, more than any of
his video poker statements.

- H.

#12

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Harry Porter" <harry.porter@...>
wrote:

rsing1111 wrote:
> I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on the loss of his son.
> That was an awful way to die, regardless of his lifestyle. But

his obsession with making believe it was OJ who dunnit after he was

> acquitted unanimously fully sours any respect one should have for
> that man. He's tried to turn his son's death into a
> money-making machine, and he should be ashamed for his

disgraceful actions.

I can't say that I periodically tune into the discussion here with

thesame fascination of a passerby craning his/her neck to view a
trafficaccident, but it's the best analogy that comes to mind.

What I've seen expressed by Rob in this installment (the above text
and preceding posts) astounds me, on numerous counts, more than any

ofhis video poker statements.

Harry: Astounded? OK. But name the part of my statements that are not
true!

#13

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>

wrote:

> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@>

wrote:

> > > Nothing to be sorry about, dufus. You gave us all a great big
laugh
> > and made yourself look foolish. What could be better.
> >
> > Looks like the laugh's on you, as usual! Next time see if you

can

> keep
> > up with the rest of the 'us's' before you stub your toe please.
> >
>
> You mean the two other posters that had already pointed out your
> monsterous faux pas? Of course, I saw them. I just couldn't

resist

the urge to point it out one more time.
>
> Now, even one more time ... could you tell us again about the
daughter OJ murdered? ROTFLMAO.

Yes. Nicole Simpson was a daughter but murdered by someone other

than

OJ, obviously. HAHAHAHAHA!!! You bit into that one but GOOD!

You said, and I quote ... "I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on
the loss of his daughter. That was an awful way to die, regardless of
her lifestyle".

Everyone can see just who is squirming, dufus.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#14

> > You mean the two other posters that had already pointed out your

monsterous faux pas? Of course, I saw them. I just couldn't

resist the urge to point it out one more time.
> >
> > Now, even one more time ... could you tell us again about the
> daughter OJ murdered? ROTFLMAO.
>
> Yes. Nicole Simpson was a daughter but murdered by someone other
than
> OJ, obviously. HAHAHAHAHA!!! You bit into that one but GOOD!

You said, and I quote ... "I easily can sympathize with Fred G. on
the loss of his daughter. That was an awful way to die, regardless of
her lifestyle".

Walking on eggs again?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#15

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > You mean the two other posters that had already pointed out

your

monsterous faux pas? Of course, I saw them. I just couldn't
> resist the urge to point it out one more time.
> > >
> > > Now, even one more time ... could you tell us again about the
> > daughter OJ murdered? ROTFLMAO.
> >
> > Yes. Nicole Simpson was a daughter but murdered by someone

other

> than
> > OJ, obviously. HAHAHAHAHA!!! You bit into that one but GOOD!
>
> You said, and I quote ... "I easily can sympathize with Fred G.

on

> the loss of his daughter. That was an awful way to die,

regardless of

> her lifestyle".

Walking on eggs again?

No, just trying to keep this thread alive so any new members can see
Robbie, the dufus, in action. Keep up the good work.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#16

> > > Yes. Nicole Simpson was a daughter but murdered by someone
other than OJ, obviously. HAHAHAHAHA!!! You bit into that one but

GOOD!

> > You said, and I quote ... "I easily can sympathize with Fred G.
on the loss of his dumb-ass son. That was an awful--but fitting--way

to die, regardless of his homosexual lifestyle".

> Walking on eggs again?

No, just trying to keep this thread alive so any new members can see
Robbie, the dufus, in action. Keep up the good work.

First, you need to learn something: The ONLY person who can keep a
thread alive here is me! You're my pawn just as much as I need you to
be, and when. Growing up an introvert nerd prepared you well for the
punishment I dish out to you here....day after day after day. Please
don't stop posting. I NEED the fix of the daily whipping I give you! It
is SOOO satisfying watching a grown man cry to the beat of the Singer
whip!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#17

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > Yes. Nicole Simpson was a daughter but murdered by someone
> other than OJ, obviously. HAHAHAHAHA!!! You bit into that one

but

GOOD!

> > > You said, and I quote ... "I easily can sympathize with Fred

G.

> on the loss of his dumb-ass son. That was an awful--but fitting--

way

to die, regardless of his homosexual lifestyle".

> > Walking on eggs again?

> No, just trying to keep this thread alive so any new members can

see

> Robbie, the dufus, in action. Keep up the good work.

First, you need to learn something: The ONLY person who can keep a
thread alive here is me!

Wrong again, dufus. I just did it with my last post (and now this
post). You never cease to amaze us with your passion for stupidity.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#18

> > > > You said, and I quote ... "I easily can sympathize with

Fred

G.
> > on the loss of his dumb-ass son. That was an awful--but

fitting--

way
> to die, regardless of his homosexual lifestyle".
>
> > > Walking on eggs again?
>
> > No, just trying to keep this thread alive so any new members

can

see
> > Robbie, the dufus, in action. Keep up the good work.
>
> First, you need to learn something: The ONLY person who can keep

a

> thread alive here is me!

Wrong again, dufus. I just did it with my last post (and now this
post). You never cease to amaze us with your passion for stupidity.

You are only allowed to post (by me) when I command you to reply.
And because you're such a habitual neurotic, you're as predictable
as my morning shit. I control you little dicky, and I am your master!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#19

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> > > > > You said, and I quote ... "I easily can sympathize with
Fred
> G.
> > > on the loss of his dumb-ass son. That was an awful--but
fitting--
> way
> > to die, regardless of his homosexual lifestyle".
> >
> > > > Walking on eggs again?
> >
> > > No, just trying to keep this thread alive so any new members
can
> see
> > > Robbie, the dufus, in action. Keep up the good work.
> >
> > First, you need to learn something: The ONLY person who can

keep

a
> > thread alive here is me!
>
> Wrong again, dufus. I just did it with my last post (and now this
> post). You never cease to amaze us with your passion for

stupidity.

You are only allowed to post (by me) when I command you to reply.
And because you're such a habitual neurotic, you're as predictable
as my morning shit. I control you little dicky, and I am your

master!

You are the Monkey Boy. Have another drink dufus.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#20

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> >
> > > > > > You said, and I quote ... "I easily can sympathize with
> Fred
> > G.
> > > > on the loss of his dumb-ass son. That was an awful--but
> fitting--
> > way
> > > to die, regardless of his homosexual lifestyle".
> > >
> > > > > Walking on eggs again?
> > >
> > > > No, just trying to keep this thread alive so any new

members

> can
> > see
> > > > Robbie, the dufus, in action. Keep up the good work.
> > >
> > > First, you need to learn something: The ONLY person who can
keep
> a
> > > thread alive here is me!
> >
> > Wrong again, dufus. I just did it with my last post (and now

this

> > post). You never cease to amaze us with your passion for
stupidity.
>
> You are only allowed to post (by me) when I command you to reply.
> And because you're such a habitual neurotic, you're as

predictable

> as my morning shit. I control you little dicky, and I am your
master!

You are the Monkey Boy. Have another drink dufus.

As he laps it right up!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote: