Median Point for Reversible Royal

[pesach_kremen1]

If you play 8/5 BP poker with a reversible royal for a $50K payoff for a sequential in either direction at one point of play (and bankroll lost) would be the median point of hitting a sequential assuming the following:

1) Palace Station 8/5 BP 50 cent reversible with their CB
2) Modifying plays in the obvious situations
    a) 3 in position > High Pair
    b) 2 in position might be better even if one is a 10 better than 2 High Cards?

3) This is the idea. If you play and, for example are expected to lose, let's say 20K by the time the you reach the median likely hit on the sequential it would be nice. Of Course every and u play u start the series over in reality but it would be interesting to know at what point of play is there a 50% chance you will get the sequential?

4) Would this be one of the better plays if you don't like the location of the optimum plays with their reduced comps and points and the value of getting rooms and meals due being from out of town is important in your calculations. Assuming your payback is 99% (due errors and sequential adjustments) does anyone have a good idea here? I am aware that 1 of 60 royals is a reversible one and my educated guess is that if you do the obvious strategy modifications that you can improve this to 1 in 40???

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Rob_Singer2]

By your own reasoning you should be identifying with just how
misleading and ridiculous optimal-play only video poker really is.
There might as well be a $1billion Sequential RF on a $5 machine with
no other payouts. Certainly, all the "advantage players" who claim to
be making a tiny win % over their lifetime should be able to earn a
pile of phantom bucks on that one. Imagine what Jean Scott could
create out of THAT one!

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, pesach kremen <royalflush2222@...>
wrote:

If you play 8/5 BP poker with a reversible royal for a $50K payoff

for a sequential in either direction at one point of play (and
bankroll lost) would be the median point of hitting a sequential
assuming the following:

1) Palace Station 8/5 BP 50 cent reversible with their CB
2) Modifying plays in the obvious situations
    a) 3 in position > High Pair
    b) 2 in position might be better even if one is a 10 better

than 2 High Cards?

3) This is the idea. If you play and, for example are expected to

lose, let's say 20K by the time the you reach the median likely hit
on the sequential it would be nice. Of Course every and u play u
start the series over in reality but it would be interesting to know
at what point of play is there a 50% chance you will get the
sequential?

4) Would this be one of the better plays if you don't like the

location of the optimum plays with their reduced comps and points and
the value of getting rooms and meals due being from out of town is
important in your calculations. Assuming your payback is 99% (due
errors and sequential adjustments) does anyone have a good idea here?
I am aware that 1 of 60 royals is a reversible one and my educated
guess is that if you do the obvious strategy modifications that you
can improve this to 1 in 40???

···

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[pesach_kremen1]

Here is what I am shooting for. I would like a game that has a low house edge (i.e bonus poker) with good slot cash, comps, and offers that still gives a chance for a huge pay off should u get lucky. That is why the BP reversible royal fits the bill. At the 50 cent level play adequate to get all the free stays and meals, with a chance for a big hit if you get lucky, while not so volatile a game as to lose your donkey. If anyone on this list knows of places offering this, that Full pay BP (8/5) with a reversible royal with CB and good comps.

robsinger1111 <robsinger1111@yahoo.com> wrote: By your own reasoning you should be identifying with just how
misleading and ridiculous optimal-play only video poker really is.
There might as well be a $1billion Sequential RF on a $5 machine with
no other payouts. Certainly, all the "advantage players" who claim to
be making a tiny win % over their lifetime should be able to earn a
pile of phantom bucks on that one. Imagine what Jean Scott could
create out of THAT one!

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, pesach kremen <royalflush2222@...>
wrote:
>
> If you play 8/5 BP poker with a reversible royal for a $50K payoff
for a sequential in either direction at one point of play (and
bankroll lost) would be the median point of hitting a sequential
assuming the following:
>
> 1) Palace Station 8/5 BP 50 cent reversible with their CB
> 2) Modifying plays in the obvious situations
> a) 3 in position > High Pair
> b) 2 in position might be better even if one is a 10 better
than 2 High Cards?
>
> 3) This is the idea. If you play and, for example are expected to
lose, let's say 20K by the time the you reach the median likely hit
on the sequential it would be nice. Of Course every and u play u
start the series over in reality but it would be interesting to know
at what point of play is there a 50% chance you will get the
sequential?
>
> 4) Would this be one of the better plays if you don't like the
location of the optimum plays with their reduced comps and points and
the value of getting rooms and meals due being from out of town is
important in your calculations. Assuming your payback is 99% (due
errors and sequential adjustments) does anyone have a good idea here?
I am aware that 1 of 60 royals is a reversible one and my educated
guess is that if you do the obvious strategy modifications that you
can improve this to 1 in 40???
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Mickey]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111" <robsinger1111@...>
wrote:

By your own reasoning you should be identifying with just how
misleading and ridiculous optimal-play only video poker really is.
There might as well be a $1billion Sequential RF on a $5 machine with
no other payouts. Certainly, all the "advantage players" who claim to
be making a tiny win % over their lifetime should be able to earn a
pile of phantom bucks on that one. Imagine what Jean Scott could
create out of THAT one!

Once again, monkey boy makes a monkey out of himself.