vpFREE2 Forums

Malignant Narcissism

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Rob Singer <robsinger1111@...>
wrote:

I was just reading thru the rest of the LVA thread that&#39;s got

Dick so worried and confused. Seems one of his fellow geniuses thinks
I claim I am able to change a negative EV game to a positive one. And
Dick, in his inimitable wisdom, agrees with this disturbed poster.

···

---------------------------------
You made this claim right here on this forum. That is, you said
you're system will win on negative EV games over time. I think we can
tell exactly who is "confused".

Entertaining, isn&#39;t it. While you&#39;ll have the honor of

reading how I&#39;ll slice and dice this idiot and his sour grapes
theory in Gaming Today on March 18th, everyone will also gain a
lesson on how and why machine EV is really determined. These
collection of quasi educated math nuts had their mathematics
comprehension skills seriously deluted once they became slaves to
gambling, and as the addiction took over they&#39;ve been manipulated
like puppets by the casinos ever since. Now I&#39;m having the time
of my life slapping them around, and if you ever run into any of them
you&#39;ll immediately recognize the Singer Effect by the impressive
mental bruises they&#39;re carrying

around . Once again....altogether now....HOW SWEET IT IS

----------------------------
Obviously Rob found a sucker recently to ply his con. It has him
pumped up and making his usual nonsense posts. From this post alone
we can see how math challenged Singer really is. The math behind VP
is simple. It's basic addition/subraction/multiplication/division.
Yet, Rob thinks he can claim some mastery that no one else has. If
Robbie wasn't so sick it would be really humorous.

Was that supposed to be a BRAG---teeheehee!

rgmustain wrote:

···

            --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogro ups.com , Rob Singer <robsinger1111@ ...>
wrote:

Let&#39;s see how you&#39;ll try to squirm out of this one. First

I&#39;m an irritating alias who ruffles your feathers no end, then
I&#39;m a banned talent with nowhere to post. If anyone&#39;s ever
stepped on their own two feet with more regularity, my God Dick,
it&#39;ll never out do you. Ever wonder why you&#39;re ridiculed so
much for being out of touch on LVA? hahaha-what a goofball. BTW, to
add a little bit of insult to injury....I just returned from playing
2 sessions of for-profit vp, which is a tad bit different from your
compulsive addiction style of play. I started out by losing $6050 on
a one dollar thru ten dollar RTT. Then I played a second, and within
40 credits on 9-5 negative EV $10 DDB, 4 aces with the kicker hit for
20k-and a nice tidy overall 10.5k profit for the day. Yeah, those 98
percent games sure are losers alright. Now I&#39;m home and unlike
you, I won&#39;t be roped in like an addicted daily fool into giving
it back. And

when I restart again next month, I&#39;ll do it at the lowest

denom of dollars, thereby wrecking all the crap you spew about what
you purport you know about my play. HOW SWEET IT IS
Hmmm, wonder who the sucker was this time?
Let's see now, I was "roped" into six royals last month. Oh, in the
small amount of 10/6 DDB I played, I only hit awak twice (and one of
the royals). My wife hit her 4th royal for the year this week as
well.
I could tell by you're response to the smoking thread that you are
soooooooo envious of me you couldn't even make a single post without
mentioning my name. You gotta love it ....
     
      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

You&#39;re a dead giveaway Dick. You&#39;re anxious and filled with the anticipation of being schooled. Gives you the chills, doesn&#39;t it. Yes, I said the neg EV machines can be beaten over time because they can and to your raging dismay, I have. No need to look foolish by pretending I claimed I turn the EV of a game around. Lots of people have won over time-which I see you avoid identifying on all types of machines. Stay tuned.....as I know and you can&#39;t help yourself tuning in for another vp lesson.

rgmustain wrote:

···

            --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogro ups.com , Rob Singer <robsinger1111@ ...>
wrote:

I was just reading thru the rest of the LVA thread that&#39;s got

Dick so worried and confused. Seems one of his fellow geniuses thinks
I claim I am able to change a negative EV game to a positive one. And
Dick, in his inimitable wisdom, agrees with this disturbed poster.
------------ --------- --------- ---
You made this claim right here on this forum. That is, you said
you're system will win on negative EV games over time. I think we can
tell exactly who is "confused".

Entertaining, isn&#39;t it. While you&#39;ll have the honor of

reading how I&#39;ll slice and dice this idiot and his sour grapes
theory in Gaming Today on March 18th, everyone will also gain a
lesson on how and why machine EV is really determined.. These
collection of quasi educated math nuts had their mathematics
comprehension skills seriously deluted once they became slaves to
gambling, and as the addiction took over they&#39;ve been manipulated
like puppets by the casinos ever since. Now I&#39;m having the time
of my life slapping them around, and if you ever run into any of them
you&#39;ll immediately recognize the Singer Effect by the impressive
mental bruises they&#39;re carrying

around . Once again....altogether now....HOW SWEET IT IS

------------ --------- -------
Obviously Rob found a sucker recently to ply his con. It has him
pumped up and making his usual nonsense posts. From this post alone
we can see how math challenged Singer really is. The math behind VP
is simple. It's basic addition/subraction /multiplication/ division.
Yet, Rob thinks he can claim some mastery that no one else has. If
Robbie wasn't so sick it would be really humorous.
     
      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

the anticipation of being schooled. Gives you the chills, doesn&#39;t
it. Yes, I said the neg EV machines can be beaten over time because
they can and to your raging dismay, I have. No need to look foolish by
pretending I claimed I turn the EV of a game around. Lots of people
have won over time-which I see you avoid identifying on all types of
machines. Stay tuned.....as I know and you can&#39;t help yourself
tuning in for another vp lesson.

So, in one post you claim one thing and turn around in the next post
and claim something else. I think that pretty much demonstrates what we
can expect from little Robbie.

PS. It has no relationship to the TRUTH.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Rob Singer <robsinger1111@...> wrote:

You&#39;re a dead giveaway Dick. You&#39;re anxious and filled with

Just the facts, as always.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Rob Singer <robsinger1111@...> wrote:

Was that supposed to be a BRAG

Ref "&#39" in you posts. I found this online:

      &#39; is the ASCII code for an apostrophe. (You're missing the semi-colon at the end in the title.) Is it possible you copied something from a word processor that was using curly quotes?
     
      tomda

      #:3106497 8:29 am on Oct. 3, 2006 (utc 0)

      RSS Google Feed are in UTF-8 and &039; is an apostrophe as said.
      It's an encoding problem. You need to configurate your parser so that it knows that input is in UTF-8 and you can also defined the charset output (UTF-8 recommended).

···

----- Original Message -----
  From: Rob Singer
  To: rgmustain@att.net
  Cc: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 5:37 PM
  Subject: RE: [FREEvpFREE] Re: Malignant Narcissism

  You&#39;re a dead giveaway Dick. You&#39;re anxious and filled with the anticipation of being schooled. Gives you the chills, doesn&#39;t it. Yes, I said the neg EV machines can be beaten over time because they can and to your raging dismay, I have. No need to look foolish by pretending I claimed I turn the EV of a game around. Lots of people have won over time-which I see you avoid identifying on all types of machines. Stay tuned.....as I know and you can&#39;t help yourself tuning in for another vp lesson.

  rgmustain wrote:
  > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogro ups.com , Rob Singer <robsinger1111@ ...>
  > wrote:
  >>
  >> I was just reading thru the rest of the LVA thread that&#39;s got
  > Dick so worried and confused. Seems one of his fellow geniuses thinks
  > I claim I am able to change a negative EV game to a positive one. And
  > Dick, in his inimitable wisdom, agrees with this disturbed poster.
  > ------------ --------- --------- ---
  > You made this claim right here on this forum. That is, you said
  > you're system will win on negative EV games over time. I think we can
  > tell exactly who is "confused".
  >> Entertaining, isn&#39;t it. While you&#39;ll have the honor of
  > reading how I&#39;ll slice and dice this idiot and his sour grapes
  > theory in Gaming Today on March 18th, everyone will also gain a
  > lesson on how and why machine EV is really determined.. These
  > collection of quasi educated math nuts had their mathematics
  > comprehension skills seriously deluted once they became slaves to
  > gambling, and as the addiction took over they&#39;ve been manipulated
  > like puppets by the casinos ever since. Now I&#39;m having the time
  > of my life slapping them around, and if you ever run into any of them
  > you&#39;ll immediately recognize the Singer Effect by the impressive
  > mental bruises they&#39;re carrying
  >> around . Once again....altogether now....HOW SWEET IT IS
  > ------------ --------- -------
  > Obviously Rob found a sucker recently to ply his con. It has him
  > pumped up and making his usual nonsense posts. From this post alone
  > we can see how math challenged Singer really is. The math behind VP
  > is simple. It's basic addition/subraction /multiplication/ division.
  > Yet, Rob thinks he can claim some mastery that no one else has. If
  > Robbie wasn't so sick it would be really humorous.
  >

  __________________________________________________________
  Looking for last minute shopping deals?
  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 6358 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

It's come to my attention that when you get backed into a corner--as
you are now--you make up rushed assertions--as you are now--while you
rush out the door to get a seat in front of a video poker machine to
satisfy your insatiable fix. Next time, please spend a little more
time responding so you don't expose and embarrass yourself. Nah...I
LOVE it!

So, in one post you claim one thing and turn around in the next post
and claim something else. I think that pretty much demonstrates what

we

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

can expect from little Robbie.

PS. It has no relationship to the TRUTH.

Just the facts, as always.

As I've asked a million times in the past, how do you propose to
confirm those are FACTS? Not the Royals of course, but the obvious
part about how much more than that you lost playing umpteen hourse
wasting your time away in the casinos every day?

Just the facts, please. Just the facts.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111" <robsinger1111@...>
wrote:

It's come to my attention that when you get backed into a corner--as
you are now--you make up rushed assertions--as you are now--while you
rush out the door to get a seat in front of a video poker machine to
satisfy your insatiable fix. Next time, please spend a little more
time responding so you don't expose and embarrass yourself. Nah...I
LOVE it!

Projection raises it's admirable head once again. Even Robbie's inner
self admits he's "backed into a corner". Yup, you really gotta love
it ...

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> Just the facts, as always.

As I've asked a million times in the past, how do you propose to
confirm those are FACTS? Not the Royals of course, but the obvious
part about how much more than that you lost playing umpteen hourse
wasting your time away in the casinos every day?

Just the facts, please. Just the facts.

I've passed along these facts many times. We even have a date next
month where you get to admire my taxes before I mail them in (you can
put 'em in the mailbox yourself).

I've even admitted I was a full 7 RFs short last year and still won a
cool $7500 without considering anything extra. Big money? Of course
not. But when you add in everything else and what my wife added to
the kitty it makes for a nice profitable pasttime.

Now, for a little humor that I'm absolutely sure will brighted
Robbie's day. I copied this out of an email going around.

···

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic
hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the
summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the
winter.

The two most important events in all of history were:
   1. The invention of beer, and
   2. The invention of the wheel. (The wheel was invented to get man
to the beer.)

These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were
the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct
subgroups:
   1. Liberals
   2. Conservatives.

   Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the
beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can
were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around
waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the
brewery. That's how villages were formed.

  Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at
night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what
came to be known as the Conservative movement.

   Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to
live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and
doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning
of what came to be known as the Liberal movement.

  Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest
became known as girlie-men.

  Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of
cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of
Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that
conservatives provided.

   Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest,
most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are
symbolized by the jackass.

   Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most
prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish, but
like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard
liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of
their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most
social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in
Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the
designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher
also bat.

  Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still
provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo
cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors,
police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and
generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own
companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

   Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the
producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe
Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of
the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to
America . The liberals crept in after the Wild West was tamed and
created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Here ends today's lesson in world history....

The following link should offset the conservative bias of the article mentioned below

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=144

rgmustain <rgmustain@att.net> wrote: --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:
>
> > Just the facts, as always.
>
> As I've asked a million times in the past, how do you propose to
> confirm those are FACTS? Not the Royals of course, but the obvious
> part about how much more than that you lost playing umpteen hourse
> wasting your time away in the casinos every day?
>
> Just the facts, please. Just the facts.
>

I've passed along these facts many times. We even have a date next
month where you get to admire my taxes before I mail them in (you can
put 'em in the mailbox yourself).

I've even admitted I was a full 7 RFs short last year and still won a
cool $7500 without considering anything extra. Big money? Of course
not. But when you add in everything else and what my wife added to
the kitty it makes for a nice profitable pasttime.

Now, for a little humor that I'm absolutely sure will brighted
Robbie's day. I copied this out of an email going around.

···

----------------------------------------------------------

Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic
hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the
summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the
winter.

The two most important events in all of history were:
    1. The invention of beer, and
    2. The invention of the wheel. (The wheel was invented to get man
to the beer.)

These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were
the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct
subgroups:
    1. Liberals
    2. Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the
beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can
were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around
waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the
brewery. That's how villages were formed.

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at
night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what
came to be known as the Conservative movement.

Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to
live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and
doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning
of what came to be known as the Liberal movement.

Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest
became known as girlie-men.

Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of
cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of
Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that
conservatives provided.

Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest,
most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are
symbolized by the jackass.

Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most
prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish, but
like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard
liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of
their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most
social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in
Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the
designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher
also bat.

Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still
provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo
cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors,
police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and
generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own
companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the
producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe
Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of
the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to
America . The liberals crept in after the Wild West was tamed and
created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Here ends today's lesson in world history....

---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I wonder....what's it like flat out denying virtually everything I say
about you that you know is true after admitting it apparently
unknowingly in multiple posts on every forum you post on---and then out
of nowhere hitting you in the head like a sledge hammer! What I like
most about you is how you open your soul on these boards without ever
realizing it. No...I LOVE it!!

···

Projection raises it's admirable head once again. Even Robbie's inner
self admits he's "backed into a corner". Yup, you really gotta love
it ...

And I will be there - and will report on it whatever the truth in GT,
as always. I'll be in town April 4-9 for various reasons and am
available most days. I await the details. I will need to see your
contemporaneous gambling record as well as your withdrawal/re-deposit
bank records that will irrefutably tie your records together. Be sure
you include only machine winnings. I have no use for fluff value such
as gas cards, gifts, cash back/free-play/BB cash, etc., or any of
your other nonsense that makes you feel as if you know what you're
doing. If you choose to do that you will be doing yourself a great
disservice. Otherwise, if entire proof is there then my readers will
FINALLY get to see one AP who has had at least one true winning year.
Remember, frssh on the minds of players is Jean Scott's admittance
that she's been losing at the machines since 2000. Not at all
surprising to me, but it is to most.

Tell us: Is +$7500 really worth all that time you and the missus
waste away in the casinos and have made the focal point in your life?
Is it worth inhaling all that smoke and stale air you claim doesn't
exist in he casinos where you play? Is it worth the elimination of
the normal lifestyle you dreampt of all your life upon retiring?
Those are the questions I know make you try to appear so non-chalant
about but are really haunting in their true meaning.

I've passed along these facts many times. We even have a date next
month where you get to admire my taxes before I mail them in (you

can

put 'em in the mailbox yourself).

I've even admitted I was a full 7 RFs short last year and still won

a

cool $7500 without considering anything extra. Big money? Of course
not. But when you add in everything else and what my wife added to
the kitty it makes for a nice profitable pasttime.

Now, for a little humor that I'm absolutely sure will brighted
Robbie's day. I copied this out of an email going around.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic
hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the
summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in

the

winter.

The two most important events in all of history were:
   1. The invention of beer, and
   2. The invention of the wheel. (The wheel was invented to get

man

to the beer.)

These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were
the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct
subgroups:
   1. Liberals
   2. Conservatives.

   Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the
beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can
were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around
waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the
brewery. That's how villages were formed.

  Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q

at

night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what
came to be known as the Conservative movement.

   Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to
live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's

and

doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the

beginning

of what came to be known as the Liberal movement.

  Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest
became known as girlie-men.

  Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of
cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept

of

Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that
conservatives provided.

   Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the

largest,

most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are
symbolized by the jackass.

   Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most
prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish, but
like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are

standard

liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of
their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most
social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in
Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the
designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher
also bat.

  Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still
provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo
cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical

doctors,

police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and
generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own
companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

   Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the
producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals

believe

···

Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of
the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to
America . The liberals crept in after the Wild West was tamed and
created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Here ends today's lesson in world history....

"Girlie-men" says it all. Michael Moore is a fat ass bafoon.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, pesach kremen <royalflush2222@...>
wrote:

The following link should offset the conservative bias of the

article mentioned below

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=144

rgmustain <rgmustain@...> wrote: ---

In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"

<robsinger1111@> wrote:
>
> > Just the facts, as always.
>
> As I've asked a million times in the past, how do you propose to
> confirm those are FACTS? Not the Royals of course, but the

obvious

> part about how much more than that you lost playing umpteen

hourse

> wasting your time away in the casinos every day?
>
> Just the facts, please. Just the facts.
>

I've passed along these facts many times. We even have a date next
month where you get to admire my taxes before I mail them in (you

can

put 'em in the mailbox yourself).

I've even admitted I was a full 7 RFs short last year and still

won a

cool $7500 without considering anything extra. Big money? Of

course

not. But when you add in everything else and what my wife added to
the kitty it makes for a nice profitable pasttime.

Now, for a little humor that I'm absolutely sure will brighted
Robbie's day. I copied this out of an email going around.

----------------------------------------------------------

Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic
hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the
summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in

the

winter.

The two most important events in all of history were:
    1. The invention of beer, and
    2. The invention of the wheel. (The wheel was invented to get

man

to the beer.)

These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were
the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct
subgroups:
    1. Liberals
    2. Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the
beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum

can

were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around
waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the
brewery. That's how villages were formed.

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at
night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of

what

came to be known as the Conservative movement.

Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to
live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's

and

doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the

beginning

of what came to be known as the Liberal movement.

Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest
became known as girlie-men.

Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of
cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept

of

Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that
conservatives provided.

Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest,
most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are
symbolized by the jackass.

Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most
prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish,

but

like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are

standard

liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: most

of

their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most
social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers

in

Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented

the

designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher
also bat.

Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still
provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters,

rodeo

cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical

doctors,

police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and
generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own
companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the
producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals

believe

Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of
the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to
America . The liberals crept in after the Wild West was tamed and
created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Here ends today's lesson in world history....

---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.

Try it now.

···

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This was SO good, I just had to reply!

A priceless RS projection ... born out of frustration ... and tells you
everything you need to know about his approach to TRUTH.

The topper is his admission that he subconsciously uses projection to
mirror his true character. Basically he's saying that he has such low
esteem that he enjoys beating himself up (through others) on message
boards.

Do us all a favor and take your twisted psyche to a psychiatrist
instead.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111" <robsinger1111@...>
wrote:

I wonder....what's it like flat out denying virtually everything I

say

about you that you know is true after admitting it apparently
unknowingly in multiple posts on every forum you post on---and then

out

of nowhere hitting you in the head like a sledge hammer! What I like
most about you is how you open your soul on these boards without ever
realizing it. No...I LOVE it!!

> Projection raises it's admirable head once again. Even Robbie's

inner

···

> self admits he's "backed into a corner". Yup, you really gotta love
> it ...

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111" <robsinger1111@...>
wrote:

I wonder....what's it like flat out denying virtually everything I

say

about you that you know is true after admitting it apparently
unknowingly in multiple posts on every forum you post on---and then

out

of nowhere hitting you in the head like a sledge hammer! What I like
most about you is how you open your soul on these boards without ever
realizing it. No...I LOVE it!!

The only things I've ever denied are still, and always have been,
fabrications brought on by your envy of my success. If your envy wasn't
obvious enough you just admitted you read other forums just to see my
posts.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

And I will be there - and will report on it whatever the truth in

GT,

as always. I'll be in town April 4-9 for various reasons and am
available most days. I await the details. I will need to see your
contemporaneous gambling record as well as your withdrawal/re-

deposit

bank records that will irrefutably tie your records together.

I will let you see my records and my tax form. Bank records are of no
value since we've already established they can be manipulated as
needed. The ONLY true evidence that I am winning is that I will claim
those winnings and pay taxes on them.

Be sure
you include only machine winnings. I have no use for fluff value

such

as gas cards, gifts, cash back/free-play/BB cash, etc., or any of
your other nonsense that makes you feel as if you know what you're
doing.

It's all in my records. They are kept as distinct items. In fact, I
keep all these values individually for each casino. Monthly stats?
Got those too.

If you choose to do that you will be doing yourself a great
disservice. Otherwise, if entire proof is there then my readers

will

FINALLY get to see one AP who has had at least one true winning

year.

I know there are many APers who have had winning years. You know it
as well. Let's face it, there are probably thousands of gamblers,
including clueless slot players, that have winning years. It's simple
statistics that with millions of gamblers, some will win. The big
difference with APers is they win most years.

Remember, frssh on the minds of players is Jean Scott's admittance
that she's been losing at the machines since 2000. Not at all
surprising to me, but it is to most.

And, she still made money each and every year as a direct result of
her gambling. No matter how much you try to twist it, this is the
bottom line.

Tell us: Is +$7500 really worth all that time you and the missus
waste away in the casinos and have made the focal point in your

life?

Gambling is one of the things we do for recreation. We make a little
money, eat free food, put up friends and relatives when they come to
town. I played golf today. Some folks think that is a waste of time
as well, but each to there own. Your value judgement of playing in
casinos may work for you but it doesn't work for many other people.
Personally, I have no interest in motorcycles … should I claim
working on them is a waste of time for someone else???

Is it worth inhaling all that smoke and stale air you claim doesn't
exist in he casinos where you play?

I never said it doesn't exist, only that it can be minimized by
playing at certain times. And, yes it is worth it. For many years
before smoking bans took effect there was smoking in the workplace. I
dealt with it then and I deal with it now. A bigger concern to me
personally is driving around LV. It is a MUCH bigger risk than 2nd
hand smoke. Once again, I minimize the risks by selecting safer
travel times. And, of course, I had to drive to the golf course as
well. Living is a risk.

Is it worth the elimination of
the normal lifestyle you dreampt of all your life upon retiring?

It's just another journey. I tried the PBA for awhile and now I'm
trying this for awhile. I can't say what will be next, but I will
probably move on to something else eventually. Having an independent
lifestyle is what I wanted when I retired and it is what I have. Who
knows, maybe I will take up motorcycling.

Those are the questions I know make you try to appear so non-

chalant

about but are really haunting in their true meaning.

Are they? I handled your pathetic attempts to create a negative image
of my life with ease. I can do this because there are no more
negatives in my life style than in most others. Like I said, living
is a risk, you can hide from it or you can live it.

Imagine that....a lie, fear, and denial all wrapped up into one self-
incriminating and tortured post!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

The only things I've ever denied....

I will let you see my records and my tax form. Bank records are of

no value since we've already established they can be manipulated as

needed.

Huh? Explain for the idiots you think we all are just how on-line
bank statements can be "manipulated"!

The ONLY true evidence that I am winning is that I will claim those
winnings and pay taxes on them.

As soon as you begin a statement with "The ONLY" you expose your
typical and cowardly backing out again. Pay taxes on them? (certainly
predictably instated for the sole purpose of a weak defense). And
just now many ways are there to manipulate your return to negate the
extra $750-$1400 of the "winnings" tax liability? You're just as much
a chump here as you are on every other issue. Proof can only be
established by tying financial records together along with self-kept
casino contemporaneous data. Simply inserting "I won $7500" means
nothing to the auditor. The IRS would require exactly the same as I
require because I've gone thru it several times. Look at me as the
IRS.

I know there are many APers who have had winning years.

Please explain the proof behind that ridiculous assertion. The fact--
and I deal only in FACTS--is that you ride what you hear, and if
you've ever taken a good look at the entertaining collection of
slugs, neurotics, fat-asses, cancer-stick-puffing alcoholics, broken-
family losers, single fools who never could make it living with
someone else, Chinks, and insecure self-confidence-lacking phenoms
who say they are "winning AP's", then you'd probably throw up after
reading what you just wrote.

You know it

as well. Let's face it, there are probably thousands of gamblers,
including clueless slot players, that have winning years. It's

simple

statistics that with millions of gamblers, some will win. The big
difference with APers is they win most years.

We're not just talking about lucky-hit winning years. We're talking
about consistency, and AP's do not have that from my and at least a
thousand others' experiences who have no reason to lie to me about
losing.

> Remember, frssh on the minds of players is Jean Scott's

admittance

> that she's been losing at the machines since 2000. Not at all
> surprising to me, but it is to most.

And, she still made money each and every year as a direct result of
her gambling. No matter how much you try to twist it, this is the
bottom line.

The hurtful bottom line to you is that she admitted she lost at the
machines for the sole reason that she could not play +EV games
anymore. But when you look back over her articles you'll clearly see
multiple times where she said she sat all day at the Suncoast,
Reserve, and her favorite--The Orleans' $2 10/7DB games for several
yearsbefore they lowered the pay tables. You see, you APer's are one
contradiction after another, and when one of you comes out and steps
all over their own feet the rest of you come to their defense simply
because it makes all of you look stoopid. I just capitalize and
report on the foolishness of it all, and come out looking better than
ever to the true player base.

> Tell us: Is +$7500 really worth all that time you and the missus
> waste away in the casinos and have made the focal point in your
life?

Gambling is one of the things we do for recreation.

What's the saying---yada, yada, yada? How many years did we have to
listen to your hero The Queen blab about that when it was convenient
to blab it, then turn around the next time and claim her and her live-
in 401k cash cow were professionals....without ever thinking how it
would make her look? Players bring up her glaring inconsistencies all
the time. Like being "frugal". HAHAHA! Tell me more about it!

We make a little
money, eat free food, put up friends and relatives when they come

to

town. I played golf today. Some folks think that is a waste of time
as well, but each to there own. Your value judgement of playing in
casinos may work for you but it doesn't work for many other people.
Personally, I have no interest in motorcycles … should I claim
working on them is a waste of time for someone else???

Pardon me, but if you ever took a TRUE look at how much time you put
into being in the casinos, all the forums you post on about vp, and
the effort it took to move to LV just to be closer to your habit--
then measure it up against the normal lifestyle that most people
live, you'd probably puke.

I never said it doesn't exist, only that it can be minimized by
playing at certain times. And, yes it is worth it. For many years
before smoking bans took effect there was smoking in the workplace.

I

dealt with it then and I deal with it now. A bigger concern to me
personally is driving around LV. It is a MUCH bigger risk than 2nd
hand smoke. Once again, I minimize the risks by selecting safer
travel times. And, of course, I had to drive to the golf course as
well. Living is a risk.

This is a PERFECT example of how addicted gamblers learn how to
justify things they're aware of that are not good for them in any way.

> Is it worth the elimination of
> the normal lifestyle you dreampt of all your life upon retiring?

It's just another journey. I tried the PBA for awhile and now I'm
trying this for awhile. I can't say what will be next, but I will
probably move on to something else eventually. Having an

independent

lifestyle is what I wanted when I retired and it is what I have.

Who

knows, maybe I will take up motorcycling.

My prediction? You will go to your grave playing video poker. You
don't get it yet? As soon as you get back to Minn. your'ew hands will
start profusely sweating to get back to that Indian clip joint to
play the machines for hours on end again. In fact, It's just a matter
of numbers how many other Indian casinos you'll stop at just to play
vp on the trip back in April.

> Those are the questions I know make you try to appear so non-
chalant
> about but are really haunting in their true meaning.

Are they? I handled your pathetic attempts to create a negative

image

of my life with ease. I can do this because there are no more
negatives in my life style than in most others. Like I said, living
is a risk, you can hide from it or you can live it.

Living is a risk, but denial on the Internet is not. That's why you
feel so good about it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111" <robsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> The only things I've ever denied....

Imagine that....a lie, fear, and denial all wrapped up into one self-
incriminating and tortured post!

Just the facts, as always ... I guess Robbie couldn't handle it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote: