Updated through 18 APR
http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/whatsnews.cfm?WhatsNewsID=495
<a href="http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/whatsnews.cfm?WhatsNewsID=495">
http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/whatsnews.cfm?WhatsNewsID=495</a>
LVA Today's News
Updated through 18 APR
http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/whatsnews.cfm?WhatsNewsID=495
WhatsNewsID=495">
http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/whatsnews.cfm?WhatsNewsID=495</a>
Interesting tidbit of information .... the Sahara evidently has the
highest cashback rate in LV (.50%).
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpFREE" <vpFREE@C...> wrote:
A current report indicates that Sahara's cashback rate for
video poker was changed to 0.25% some time ago.
vpFREE Administrator
···
On 19 Apr 2005 at 18:01, brumar_lv wrote:
Interesting tidbit of information .... the Sahara evidently has the
highest cashback rate in LV (.50%).
> Interesting tidbit of information .... the Sahara evidently has
the
> highest cashback rate in LV (.50%).
A current report indicates that Sahara's cashback rate for
video poker was changed to 0.25% some time ago.vpFREE Administrator
My post was based on the comment below (taken from the LVA website).
It suggests the VP cashback level is now .50%, and 1% for slots.
April 8 -- Highest Cashback in Town?
The Sahara is now offering EZMoney (free play) in addition to regular
cashback and comps. If you have an active players account, earn $10
in EZMoney bonus free-play for every 200 points ($2,000 coin-in)
earned each month. The promotion is reportedly ongoing and began on
April 1. When you've earned 200 points, go to Club Sahara and a club
representative will issue $10 in EZMoney. You can earn up to $50 a
day; $1,500 per month maximum. We're checking to see if there have
been changes in the normal cashback rates. According to last
information, it looks like this translates to .50% for video poker
and a full 1% for reel slots. We'll report if these numbers are
different. Look for the full analysis of this offer in the May LVA.
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpFREE" <vpFREE@C...> wrote:
On 19 Apr 2005 at 18:01, brumar_lv wrote: