Any help on this subject would be appreciated, My girlfriend(Same
address different last name) and I will be staying and playing at
the LV Hilton in April for 2 nites , playing through about 15k
on .25 cent vp. For the sake of future marketing offers are we
better off using 1 slot card in my name or each of us use our own
cards. Thanks Six
LV Hilton offers
six_packs_2 wrote:
Any help on this subject would be appreciated, My girlfriend(Same
address different last name) and I will be staying and playing at
the LV Hilton in April for 2 nites , playing through about 15k
on .25 cent vp. For the sake of future marketing offers are we
better off using 1 slot card in my name or each of us use our own
cards. Thanks Six
Different people typically have a different take on this one, and each
person is probably correct in at least some respect. I'll tell you
how my wife and I have reasoned our approach at LVH when we were very
active (6 trips in '03, for example).
At most casinos (LVH incl.) offers grow exponentially stronger with
any given increment in play. In other words, someone with a $30K
daily average is likely to receive offers valued at more than twice
the value of someone with a $15K average.
In part, this is reasonable since the $30K player tends not to consume
twice the room and food/beverage comps of the $15K. Therefore, of the
total comp allowance earned on play (not just F/B), there's an extra
amount available for supplemental offers (cash, etc.) for the $30K player.
So, our take has been that until our play has hit the level at which
benefits would be maxed out on just one's persons play, we expected
that our offers on combined play would exceed those if our play was
recorded separately.
All I can say is that we were very satisfied with what we received on
combined play (which, admittedly was at the $30K+/day level at LVH).
However, I know others who felt they got the better of things by
playing on individual cards.
The one advantage to separate cards is that it's possible for either
player to make a solo trip since each has their own offers.
- Harry
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Harry Porter" <harry.porter@v...>
wrote:
···
The one advantage to separate cards is that it's possible for either
player to make a solo trip since each has their own offers.- Harry
=========================
Does this mean that Bev lets you go by yourself?
Babe
jackessiebabe wrote:
Does this mean that Bev lets you go by yourself?
Yep! 
I've earned her lifelong trust via a "brutal honesty" policy.
That policy (relayed in confidence, of course) is that if she can
count on the "plain vanilla" truth ... even when it comes to the most
embarrassing details and, grit your teeth, most vanity questions ...
she'll trust everything that rolls out of my mouth.
I figure that gives me an excellent chit (for deception) I can take
advantage of at the most critical moment down the road should it be
needed!
(e.g. "Where'd that lipstick come fron on your collar and what's this
very unusual perfume scent??!!"
"Er ... I had the most spectacular collision on the sidewalk today!")
- Harry
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Harry Porter" <harry.porter@v...>
wrote:
jackessiebabe wrote:
> Does this mean that Bev lets you go by yourself?Yep!
policy.
That policy (relayed in confidence, of course) is that if she can
count on the "plain vanilla" truth ... even when it comes to the
most
embarrassing details and, grit your teeth, most vanity
questions ...
she'll trust everything that rolls out of my mouth.
I figure that gives me an excellent chit (for deception) I can take
advantage of at the most critical moment down the road should it be
needed!(e.g. "Where'd that lipstick come fron on your collar and what's
this
very unusual perfume scent??!!"
"Er ... I had the most spectacular collision on the sidewalk
today!")
···
- Harry
==========================
I think that your collision story is most
imaginative, Harry. Were I Bev, I would certainly give you
extra points for such a creative thought.
The best fidelity arrangement that I've ever heard, was devised
by my daughter and son-in-law. They agreed early on in their
marriage, that if either of them desired to have a "dalliance"
outside of marriage, that it would be alright, PROVIDED that the
other partner, after having the situation explained to him/her
in detail, gave permission to do so. Somehow, not once during the
10+ years that've been married, has this come up.
Anyway, you get high marks from me for your originality.
Have a Happy Easter.
Babe