vpFREE2 Forums

LV Hilton CB Report

It will be a day of mourning for me!

But then, I'll get over it and go play some 10/7 DB...

carlos

Albert Pearson wrote:

> I believe that these old machines
> are probably on the list for being replaced by shiny new TITO

machines.

I suspect you're right - All American is almost gone now and when

the

LVH machines go, it will not likely come back in LV. Most people

don't

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Skip Hughes <skiphughes@e...> wrote:

play it, but that's no consolation for those that do.
Skip

AA with the UnAmerican paytable is the likely replacement, but it is
possible for the newer GMrs to have the 200 4OAK paytable.

The President here in STL put in some new GMrs last year (the new
graphics is the way to tell if they are the newer version) and
initially had the UnAmerican paytable on them. They received quite a
few complaints and they responded by putting the 200 paytable back on
them.

>
> I suspect you're right - All American is almost gone now and when

the

> LVH machines go, it will not likely come back in LV. Most people

don't

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "paladin415x" <paladin415x@y...> wrote:

> play it, but that's no consolation for those that do.
> Skip

The newer Game Makers have AA with 150 and 175 coin quads.

I am told you'll see TITO Game Makers within 6 months-they were
recently approved in NV-and I'm also told that when that happens,
you'll probably see the reappearance of a much beloved $5 Game Maker
somewhere in the Silver State.

While we're on the subject of juicy progressives....

There was a 7/5 JB progressive here in STL at Harrahs a couple years
ago that was often VERY positive. Typical prog on RF, but also on
the SF and 4OAK. What made it positive so often was that these were
MG machines, but the 4OAK prog could only be hit when playing JB.
Here's the interesting part.....one of the machines would NOT reset
the meter. In other words you could hit prog after prog and nothing
would change on the progressives....oh how fun that was. I would
typically wander in when they first opened (Remember, this is
backwater MO that we're talking about and casinos close 5 out 7 days)
and, more often than not, the drunk ploppies had driven up the
progressive for me....I think the record quad I hit was about $120.

Harrahs finally learned of this but had trouble fixing it for some
reason. The best they were ever able to do was to get the machine to
reset the meter, but ONLY after the RF/SF/Quad was played off. In
other words, if you hit the progressive, you could leave it on the
screen and play another machine and hit the same progressive again.

There was a progressive bank at GVR that had been programed wrong
and the resets on the progressives started the game out at 101.8.
This went from the day they opened until April of the following
year. I had the honor of hitting the last progressive meter before
it reset to it's corrected new value. When I looked up at the meter
I thought to myself, "son of a gun, they finally fixed it".
Although I have no problem sharing info that is common knowledge, I
was not going to advertise this play. It was often in the 103%

range

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "staninnv" <arnot@c...> wrote:

and most of the people playing the bank didn't even realize it.

This is not that important, but I would also add that the graphics on
the new machines look like something my Commodore 64 would have
produced back in the Olden Days. What's up with what? 256-color
graphics chips cost like, 50 cents, nowadays.

carlos

PS Ok, that was an exaggeration. They're a $1.75

AA with the UnAmerican paytable is the likely replacement, but it

is

possible for the newer GMrs to have the 200 4OAK paytable.

The President here in STL put in some new GMrs last year (the new
graphics is the way to tell if they are the newer version) and
initially had the UnAmerican paytable on them. They received quite

a

few complaints and they responded by putting the 200 paytable back

on

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hockeystl" <vegasstl@c...> wrote:

them.