rgmustain wrote:
It's only your jealousy of me that makes you want to interpret
anything in that manner. I've not had any posting privileges changed
so zilch on the "smacked down" claim. And, even if that were to
happen it wouldn't be a problem to me. I haven't seen any useful
information on VPfree in a long time. I provide much more to the
forum than I receive. Helping others is my primary motivation and it
is also what made me question the admins actions. He may have been
right or not, the problem with doing barrings in secret is we will never know.
We'll know, if a disciplined member believes they have been treated
unfairly and publicly requests a response from me.
I caught the adminstrator doing retaliation for my comments about his
secretive barrings. The fact that all the notes that led to the
barrings came between the warning he sent to me and the post in
question is absolute proof of that fact. This points out the
administrator has some real problems with anyone challenging them. I
made my point and I'm pretty sure the admin knows I'm right.
If you want to call a private email requesting that you observe the
rules a "retaliation", that's fine with me. I don't believe many people
will agree with you.
He also
knows that debating this with me is not in his best interest, hence,
he quit responding. Not all that different from you when you decide
to run away after losing every debate to me.
I show that the last post in our secrecy thread was message #5222 by me
on 14 March. No response from you.
I show that the last post in our retaliation thread was message #5243 by me
on 15 March. No response from you.
vpFREE Administrator