This'll SURELY make his hands sweat and his heart race! Red Rock Canyon
starts up the machines and tables at 10pm tonight, and they have 25c &
50c 10/6 DDB, 10/7 DB, FPDW, and some loose deuce >100%er. Now I
ask....How in the world can such an addict STAY AWAY at a time like
THIS!?! Talk about the face of pain.......
Better hurry before all the pros lurking in the streets of LV
hammer 'em to death!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
This'll SURELY make his hands sweat and his heart race! Red Rock
Canyon
starts up the machines and tables at 10pm tonight, and they have
25c &
50c 10/6 DDB, 10/7 DB, FPDW, and some loose deuce >100%er. Now I
ask....How in the world can such an addict STAY AWAY at a time like
THIS!?! Talk about the face of pain.......
The only game that would interest me is .50 FPDW. If it's still
around next month, when I return, I will play it. That's what APers
do, find good plays and play them.
Better hurry before all the pros lurking in the streets of LV
hammer 'em to death!
I suspect the FPDW will already be gone. It's a borderliine play for
many of the pros. But, it will be hit hard by the APers.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> This'll SURELY make his hands sweat and his heart race! Red Rock
Canyon starts up the machines and tables at 10pm tonight, and they
have 25c & 50c 10/6 DDB, 10/7 DB, FPDW, and some loose deuce >100%er.
Now I ask....How in the world can such an addict STAY AWAY at a time
like THIS!?! Talk about the face of pain.......
The only game that would interest me is .50 FPDW. If it's still
around next month, when I return, I will play it. That's what APers
do, find good plays and play them.
I'm glad to understand that's what 'AP's' do. I'm what's called
an 'intelligent, winning' player. They also have a few machines near
the high limit area with 25c/50c/$1/$2/$5 8/5 BP & 9/6 DDBP on them.
In the high limit room they have the same in $5/$10/$25--but also
with 7/5 SDDBP. Those are what I will play---but only in the
denominations that I have to in order to attain my win goals and get
the hey out of there!
> Better hurry before all the pros lurking in the streets of LV
> hammer 'em to death!
I suspect the FPDW will already be gone. It's a borderliine play
for many of the pros. But, it will be hit hard by the APers.
Your hero Bob Dancer will be in there tonight playing the $100
machines. However, he's got a surprise awaiting: they only take 3
credits at a time! Not enough thrills.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> > This'll SURELY make his hands sweat and his heart race! Red
Rock
> Canyon starts up the machines and tables at 10pm tonight, and
they
have 25c & 50c 10/6 DDB, 10/7 DB, FPDW, and some loose deuce >100%
er.
Now I ask....How in the world can such an addict STAY AWAY at a
time
like THIS!?! Talk about the face of pain.......
> The only game that would interest me is .50 FPDW. If it's still
> around next month, when I return, I will play it. That's what
APers
> do, find good plays and play them.
I'm glad to understand that's what 'AP's' do. I'm what's called
an 'intelligent, winning' player.
And a liar.
They also have a few machines near
the high limit area with 25c/50c/$1/$2/$5 8/5 BP & 9/6 DDBP on
them.
In the high limit room they have the same in $5/$10/$25--but also
with 7/5 SDDBP. Those are what I will play---but only in the
denominations that I have to in order to attain my win goals and
get
the hey out of there!
Good luck ... you'll need it.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > This'll SURELY make his hands sweat and his heart race! Red
Rock
> > Canyon starts up the machines and tables at 10pm tonight, and
they
> have 25c & 50c 10/6 DDB, 10/7 DB, FPDW, and some loose deuce >100%
er.
> Now I ask....How in the world can such an addict STAY AWAY at a
time
> like THIS!?! Talk about the face of pain.......
>
> > The only game that would interest me is .50 FPDW. If it's still
> > around next month, when I return, I will play it. That's what
APers
> > do, find good plays and play them.
>
> I'm glad to understand that's what 'AP's' do. I'm what's called
> an 'intelligent, winning' player.And a liar.
Liar.
> They also have a few machines near
> the high limit area with 25c/50c/$1/$2/$5 8/5 BP & 9/6 DDBP on
them.
> In the high limit room they have the same in $5/$10/$25--but also
> with 7/5 SDDBP. Those are what I will play---but only in the
> denominations that I have to in order to attain my win goals and
get
> the hey out of there!Good luck ... you'll need it.
Why didn't you hear....Good luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a
winning hand! But let's look at the stupidity of your statement. At
88.5% I need 'good luck' to win $1500 in an approx. 2 hour session.
But at 100.8% for 2 hours you don't require any good luck at all!
Nuff said.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> > > > This'll SURELY make his hands sweat and his heart race! Red
> Rock
> > > Canyon starts up the machines and tables at 10pm tonight, and
> they
> > have 25c & 50c 10/6 DDB, 10/7 DB, FPDW, and some loose deuce
100%
> er.
> > Now I ask....How in the world can such an addict STAY AWAY at a
> time
> > like THIS!?! Talk about the face of pain.......
> >
> > > The only game that would interest me is .50 FPDW. If it's
still
> > > around next month, when I return, I will play it. That's what
> APers
> > > do, find good plays and play them.
> >
> > I'm glad to understand that's what 'AP's' do. I'm what's called
> > an 'intelligent, winning' player.
>
> And a liar.Liar.
Sorry, but I just proved you were a liar in the previus post. Add to
that ... it appears RRC does not have .50 FPDW. Oh, what about 30>22.
Do I need to go on?
>
> > They also have a few machines near
> > the high limit area with 25c/50c/$1/$2/$5 8/5 BP & 9/6 DDBP on
> them.
> > In the high limit room they have the same in $5/$10/$25--but
also
> > with 7/5 SDDBP. Those are what I will play---but only in the
> > denominations that I have to in order to attain my win goals
and
> get
> > the hey out of there!
>
> Good luck ... you'll need it.Why didn't you hear....Good luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a
winning hand!
Are you back to pushing the hit deal/draw everytime strategy? LMAO.
But let's look at the stupidity of your statement. At
88.5% I need 'good luck' to win $1500 in an approx. 2 hour session.
Yup.
But at 100.8% for 2 hours you don't require any good luck at all!
Nope. Just average luck.
Nuff said.
... to expose your con again. How sweet it is ...
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > This'll SURELY make his hands sweat and his heart race!
Red
> > Rock
> > > > Canyon starts up the machines and tables at 10pm tonight,
and
> > they
> > > have 25c & 50c 10/6 DDB, 10/7 DB, FPDW, and some loose deuce
>100%
> > er.
> > > Now I ask....How in the world can such an addict STAY AWAY at
a
> > time
> > > like THIS!?! Talk about the face of pain.......
> > >
> > > > The only game that would interest me is .50 FPDW. If it's
still
> > > > around next month, when I return, I will play it. That's
what
> > APers
> > > > do, find good plays and play them.
> > >
> > > I'm glad to understand that's what 'AP's' do. I'm what's
called
> > > an 'intelligent, winning' player.
> >
> > And a liar.
>
> Liar.Sorry, but I just proved you were a liar in the previus post. Add
to
that ... it appears RRC does not have .50 FPDW. Oh, what about
30>22.
Do I need to go on?
Always using 'previous posts' and 'previous threads' without
explanations to escape from replying to the issues that obviously
turn your face red. You lied, you got caught again. Admit it like a
man even if you're a geeky one.
> >
> > > They also have a few machines near
> > > the high limit area with 25c/50c/$1/$2/$5 8/5 BP & 9/6 DDBP
on
> > them.
> > > In the high limit room they have the same in $5/$10/$25--but
also
> > > with 7/5 SDDBP. Those are what I will play---but only in the
> > > denominations that I have to in order to attain my win goals
and
> > get
> > > the hey out of there!
> >
> > Good luck ... you'll need it.
>
> Why didn't you hear....Good luck is the only way anyone EVER gets
a
> winning hand!
Are you back to pushing the hit deal/draw everytime strategy? LMAO.
??? Are you lost again with nothing to say other than whatever's
mixing around from the past in your mind? Exactly waht a geek does.
They make up a scenario that's cloudy and unsure, then continue the
fantasy by nebulously presenting a generalized topic and believing
everyone else will understand it the same way the nerd does -
thereby, making the nerd feel falsely better after becoming perturbed
by the truth. Too bad you got caught again!
> But let's look at the stupidity of your statement. At
> 98.5% I need 'good luck' to win $1500 in an approx. 2 hour
session.
Yup.
> But at 100.8% for 2 hours you don't require any good luck at all!
Nope. Just average luck.
> Nuff said.
... to expose your con again. How sweet it is ...
Thank you. You just made your stupidest argument more stupid. First
you say it's the 'long-run' that's important. Now it's not--you
simply need 'average luck' in 2 hours. So every two hour session
follows that pattern, does it..... You are SO caught with your pants
down here, your momma couldn't save your ass on this one!!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> > > > > > This'll SURELY make his hands sweat and his heart race!
Red
> > > Rock
> > > > > Canyon starts up the machines and tables at 10pm tonight,
and
> > > they
> > > > have 25c & 50c 10/6 DDB, 10/7 DB, FPDW, and some loose
deuce
> >100%
> > > er.
> > > > Now I ask....How in the world can such an addict STAY AWAY
at
a
> > > time
> > > > like THIS!?! Talk about the face of pain.......
> > > >
> > > > > The only game that would interest me is .50 FPDW. If it's
> still
> > > > > around next month, when I return, I will play it. That's
what
> > > APers
> > > > > do, find good plays and play them.
> > > >
> > > > I'm glad to understand that's what 'AP's' do. I'm what's
called
> > > > an 'intelligent, winning' player.
> > >
> > > And a liar.
> >
> > Liar.
>
> Sorry, but I just proved you were a liar in the previus post. Add
to
> that ... it appears RRC does not have .50 FPDW. Oh, what about
30>22.
> Do I need to go on?Always using 'previous posts' and 'previous threads' without
explanations to escape from replying to the issues that obviously
turn your face red. You lied, you got caught again. Admit it like a
man even if you're a geeky one.
This is humerous. You were wrong about .50 FPDW, your con is in
shambles and your words are the same old hollow one we've all seen
before. How sweet it is ...
>
> > >
> > > > They also have a few machines near
> > > > the high limit area with 25c/50c/$1/$2/$5 8/5 BP & 9/6 DDBP
on
> > > them.
> > > > In the high limit room they have the same in $5/$10/$25--
but
> also
> > > > with 7/5 SDDBP. Those are what I will play---but only in
the
> > > > denominations that I have to in order to attain my win
goals
> and
> > > get
> > > > the hey out of there!
> > >
> > > Good luck ... you'll need it.
> >
> > Why didn't you hear....Good luck is the only way anyone EVER
gets
a
> > winning hand!
>
> Are you back to pushing the hit deal/draw everytime strategy?
LMAO.
??? Are you lost again with nothing to say other than whatever's
mixing around from the past in your mind?
I guess mental retardation covers more than illogic. Here, little
Robbie forgets the discussion we had just a couple a days ago. I
showed beyond any doubt that never holding a card, simply pressing
deal/draw every time, yields "luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a
winning hand!" Anything else brings skill into the equation.
Exactly waht a geek does.
They make up a scenario that's cloudy and unsure, then continue the
fantasy by nebulously presenting a generalized topic and believing
everyone else will understand it the same way the nerd does -
thereby, making the nerd feel falsely better after becoming
perturbed
by the truth. Too bad you got caught again!
LMAO. What's it been? ... one, two days? Have I mentioned the
villiage idiot lately?
>
> > But let's look at the stupidity of your statement. At
> > 98.5% I need 'good luck' to win $1500 in an approx. 2 hour
session.
>
> Yup.
>
> > But at 100.8% for 2 hours you don't require any good luck at
all!
>
> Nope. Just average luck.
>
> > Nuff said.
>
> ... to expose your con again. How sweet it is ...Thank you. You just made your stupidest argument more stupid. First
you say it's the 'long-run' that's important.
No, it's getting the best possible results OVER TIME.
Now it's not
This is an example where Robbie asserts a lie and then bases the rest
of his addiction-driven reply on that lie.
--you
simply need 'average luck' in 2 hours. So every two hour session
follows that pattern, does it.....
No, you're the one who believes in patterns. Remember? Have you
completely lost it now?
You are SO caught with your pants
down here, your momma couldn't save your ass on this one!!
Boy, I guess Rob's frustration has reached epic levels. How sweet it
is ...
> > Sorry, but I just proved you were a liar in the previus post.
Add
> to
> > that ... it appears RRC does not have .50 FPDW. Oh, what about
> 30>22.
> > Do I need to go on?
>
> Always using 'previous posts' and 'previous threads' without
> explanations to escape from replying to the issues that obviously
> turn your face red. You lied, you got caught again. Admit it like
a
> man even if you're a geeky one.
This is humerous. You were wrong about .50 FPDW, your con is in
shambles and your words are the same old hollow one we've all seen
before. How sweet it is ...
Where'd you hear there was no 50c FPDW. I got a call directly from 2
people who were at the machines. Try again. But this isn't
surprising. You're never right and always listen to losers who get
their info from Jean Scott.
> >
> > > >
> > > > > They also have a few machines near
> > > > > the high limit area with 25c/50c/$1/$2/$5 8/5 BP & 9/6
DDBP
> on
> > > > them.
> > > > > In the high limit room they have the same in $5/$10/$25--
but
> > also
> > > > > with 7/5 SDDBP. Those are what I will play---but only in
the
> > > > > denominations that I have to in order to attain my win
goals
> > and
> > > > get
> > > > > the hey out of there!
> > > >
> > > > Good luck ... you'll need it.
> > >
> > > Why didn't you hear....Good luck is the only way anyone EVER
gets
> a
> > > winning hand!
> >
> > Are you back to pushing the hit deal/draw everytime strategy?
LMAO.
>
> ??? Are you lost again with nothing to say other than whatever's
> mixing around from the past in your mind?I guess mental retardation covers more than illogic. Here, little
Robbie forgets the discussion we had just a couple a days ago. I
showed beyond any doubt that never holding a card, simply pressing
deal/draw every time, yields "luck is the only way anyone EVER gets
a
winning hand!" Anything else brings skill into the equation.
Common sense has nothing to do with skill, and that's what 99.99% of
video poker holds are. You fools like to make believe it's tougher
than it really is to help your ego along. that's your geek problem to
deal with.
> Exactly what a geek does.
> They make up a scenario that's cloudy and unsure, then continue
the
> fantasy by nebulously presenting a generalized topic and
believing
> everyone else will understand it the same way the nerd does -
> thereby, making the nerd feel falsely better after becoming
perturbed
> by the truth. Too bad you got caught again!LMAO. What's it been? ... one, two days? Have I mentioned the
villiage idiot lately?
Looks like you've lost track of what you're arguing. Not surprising
when you lose every one.
> >
> > > But let's look at the stupidity of your statement. At
> > > 98.5% I need 'good luck' to win $1500 in an approx. 2 hour
> session.
> >
> > Yup.
> >
> > > But at 100.8% for 2 hours you don't require any good luck at
all!
> >
> > Nope. Just average luck.
> >
> > > Nuff said.
> >
> > ... to expose your con again. How sweet it is ...
>
> Thank you. You just made your stupidest argument more stupid.
First
> you say it's the 'long-run' that's important.
No, it's getting the best possible results OVER TIME.
> Now it's not
This is an example where Robbie asserts a lie and then bases the
rest
of his addiction-driven reply on that lie.
Yes, we get it. First it is then it isn't. Confusion is something you
like to think is helping your strange case along, but all you do is
sink in it. How much better can it get!?
> --you
> simply need 'average luck' in 2 hours. So every two hour session
> follows that pattern, does it.....No, you're the one who believes in patterns. Remember? Have you
completely lost it now?> You are SO caught with your pants
> down here, your momma couldn't save your ass on this one!!Boy, I guess Rob's frustration has reached epic levels. How sweet
it
is ...
If you call running around naked with your pants down sweet, you're
the sweetest!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> > > Sorry, but I just proved you were a liar in the previus post.
Add
> > to
> > > that ... it appears RRC does not have .50 FPDW. Oh, what
about
> > 30>22.
> > > Do I need to go on?
> >
> > Always using 'previous posts' and 'previous threads' without
> > explanations to escape from replying to the issues that
obviously
> > turn your face red. You lied, you got caught again. Admit it
like
a
> > man even if you're a geeky one.
>
> This is humerous. You were wrong about .50 FPDW, your con is in
> shambles and your words are the same old hollow one we've all
seen
> before. How sweet it is ...
Where'd you hear there was no 50c FPDW.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/message/59277
I got a call directly from 2
people who were at the machines. Try again. But this isn't
surprising. You're never right and always listen to losers who get
their info from Jean Scott.
Or, maybe it was a mistake that was quickly correctly. In any event,
I'll check on it in a month when I get back and see for myself. I'd
prefer that you were right.
Does anyone else find it interesting that two people, playing what
Rob would call losing plays, turn around and call him. Hmmmmmmmm.
>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > They also have a few machines near
> > > > > > the high limit area with 25c/50c/$1/$2/$5 8/5 BP & 9/6
DDBP
> > on
> > > > > them.
> > > > > > In the high limit room they have the same in $5/$10/$25-
-
> but
> > > also
> > > > > > with 7/5 SDDBP. Those are what I will play---but only
in
> the
> > > > > > denominations that I have to in order to attain my win
> goals
> > > and
> > > > > get
> > > > > > the hey out of there!
> > > > >
> > > > > Good luck ... you'll need it.
> > > >
> > > > Why didn't you hear....Good luck is the only way anyone
EVER
> gets
> > a
> > > > winning hand!
> > >
> > > Are you back to pushing the hit deal/draw everytime strategy?
> LMAO.
> >
> > ??? Are you lost again with nothing to say other than
whatever's
> > mixing around from the past in your mind?
>
> I guess mental retardation covers more than illogic. Here, little
> Robbie forgets the discussion we had just a couple a days ago. I
> showed beyond any doubt that never holding a card, simply
pressing
> deal/draw every time, yields "luck is the only way anyone EVER
gets
a
> winning hand!" Anything else brings skill into the equation.Common sense has nothing to do with skill, and that's what 99.99%
of
video poker holds are. You fools like to make believe it's tougher
than it really is to help your ego along. that's your geek problem
to
deal with.
LMAO. It doesn't matter whether it's "common sense" or mastery of
expert play, it still skill. And, it still PROVES that your statment,
"luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a winning hand!", is wrong.
>
> > Exactly what a geek does.
> > They make up a scenario that's cloudy and unsure, then continue
the
> > fantasy by nebulously presenting a generalized topic and
believing
> > everyone else will understand it the same way the nerd does -
> > thereby, making the nerd feel falsely better after becoming
> perturbed
> > by the truth. Too bad you got caught again!
>
> LMAO. What's it been? ... one, two days? Have I mentioned the
> villiage idiot lately?Looks like you've lost track of what you're arguing. Not surprising
when you lose every one.
RIV.
>
> > >
> > > > But let's look at the stupidity of your statement. At
> > > > 98.5% I need 'good luck' to win $1500 in an approx. 2 hour
> > session.
> > >
> > > Yup.
> > >
> > > > But at 100.8% for 2 hours you don't require any good luck
at
> all!
> > >
> > > Nope. Just average luck.
> > >
> > > > Nuff said.
> > >
> > > ... to expose your con again. How sweet it is ...
> >
> > Thank you. You just made your stupidest argument more stupid.
First
> > you say it's the 'long-run' that's important.
>
> No, it's getting the best possible results OVER TIME.
>
> > Now it's not
>
> This is an example where Robbie asserts a lie and then bases the
rest
> of his addiction-driven reply on that lie.Yes, we get it. First it is then it isn't.
He's doing it again. Don't you just love it when he demonstrates
immediately how right I am. Even if we hadn't all seen it a hundred
times, Rob comes through and does it again. How sweet it is ...
Confusion is something you
like to think is helping your strange case along, but all you do is
sink in it. How much better can it get!?
For me, it doesn't get any better than this.
>
> > --you
> > simply need 'average luck' in 2 hours. So every two hour
session
> > follows that pattern, does it.....
>
> No, you're the one who believes in patterns. Remember? Have you
> completely lost it now?
I guess Rob now sees the error in his thinking.
>
> > You are SO caught with your pants
> > down here, your momma couldn't save your ass on this one!!
>
> Boy, I guess Rob's frustration has reached epic levels. How sweet
it
> is ...If you call running around naked with your pants down sweet, you're
the sweetest!
Your frusration is showing again little man. Not at all surprising.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > Sorry, but I just proved you were a liar in the previus
post.
> Add
> > > to
> > > > that ... it appears RRC does not have .50 FPDW. Oh, what
about
> > > 30>22.
> > > > Do I need to go on?
> > >
> > > Always using 'previous posts' and 'previous threads' without
> > > explanations to escape from replying to the issues that
obviously
> > > turn your face red. You lied, you got caught again. Admit it
like
> a
> > > man even if you're a geeky one.
> >
> > This is humerous. You were wrong about .50 FPDW, your con is in
> > shambles and your words are the same old hollow one we've all
seen
> > before. How sweet it is ...
>
> Where'd you hear there was no 50c FPDW.http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/message/59277
> I got a call directly from 2
> people who were at the machines. Try again. But this isn't
> surprising. You're never right and always listen to losers who
get
> their info from Jean Scott.
Or, maybe it was a mistake that was quickly correctly. In any
event,
I'll check on it in a month when I get back and see for myself. I'd
prefer that you were right.
There's your mistake---listening to John "I wanted to be like Skippy
Hughes but I just couldn't muster up the right amount of moronic BS"
Kelly.
Does anyone else find it interesting that two people, playing what
Rob would call losing plays, turn around and call him. Hmmmmmmmm.
One of your ongoing dummy traits: Jumping to conclusions and looking
stupid in the process. Who said they were playing? It was during the
Grand Opening party before all the losers came in at midnight, and
the machines didn't get turned on for the VIP's until 11:30----an
hour after I received my report.
> > I guess mental retardation covers more than illogic. Here,
little
> > Robbie forgets the discussion we had just a couple a days ago.
I
> > showed beyond any doubt that never holding a card, simply
pressing
> > deal/draw every time, yields "luck is the only way anyone EVER
gets
> a
> > winning hand!" Anything else brings skill into the equation.
>
> Common sense has nothing to do with skill, and that's what 99.99%
of
> video poker holds are. You fools like to make believe it's
tougher
> than it really is to help your ego along. That's your geek
problem
to
> deal with.LMAO. It doesn't matter whether it's "common sense" or mastery of
expert play, it still skill. And, it still PROVES that your
statment, "luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a winning hand!", is
wrong.
Just as I said---the geeks take simple common sense as some sort of
invisible skill. You have no knowledge of what the deal's gonna bring
nor the draw. Luck drops the cards on you, not skill. A monkey can be
trained to play vp. And 'expert play'? HA! that's a joke. What few
hands constitute people like you to make believe you're some sort of
trail-blazing 'experts' in skill are peanuts compared to the skill
required in my strategy of determining where and when to use special
plays or not. But I get it---you fools need to think you're doing
something extraordinary to make up for that which you lack in real
life.
Exactly what a geek does. They make up a scenario that's cloudy and
unsure, then continue the fantasy by nebulously presenting a
generalized topic and believing everyone else will understand it the
same way the nerd does - thereby, making the nerd feel falsely better
after becoming perturbed by the truth. Too bad you got caught again!
> >
> > LMAO. What's it been? ... one, two days? Have I mentioned the
> > villiage idiot lately?
>
Looks like you've lost track of what you're arguing. Not surprising
when you lose every one.
Thought so.
> > > >
> > > > > But let's look at the stupidity of your statement. At
> > > > > 98.5% I need 'good luck' to win $1500 in an approx. 2
hour
> > > session.
> > > >
> > > > Yup.
> > > >
> > > > > But at 100.8% for 2 hours you don't require any good luck
at
> > all!
> > > >
> > > > Nope. Just average luck.
> > > >
> > > > > Nuff said.
> > > >
> > > > ... to expose your con again. How sweet it is ...
> > >
> > > Thank you. You just made your stupidest argument more stupid.
> First
> > > you say it's the 'long-run' that's important.
> >
> > No, it's getting the best possible results OVER TIME.
> >
> > > Now it's not
> >
> > This is an example where Robbie asserts a lie and then bases
the
> rest
> > of his addiction-driven reply on that lie.
>
> Yes, we get it. First it is then it isn't.He's doing it again. Don't you just love it when he demonstrates
immediately how right I am. Even if we hadn't all seen it a hundred
times, Rob comes through and does it again. How sweet it is ...
So nice of you to EXPLAIN what you mean instead of making believe
what you're talking about. You're really sinking in the debate
process. First in the other thread all you can do is repeat my
comments to you back to me, essentially saying 'Uncle'. Then when you
can't figure out what to say you use 'riv'. Once in a while when
lost, you ramble as in the above....at first thinking you had a
thought, but when it passed you were too dumb to start over again
with an 'riv'.
> Confusion is something you
> like to think is helping your strange case along, but all you do
is
> sink in it. How much better can it get!?
For me, it doesn't get any better than this.
I knew confusion was one of your best traits!
> >
> > > --you
> > > simply need 'average luck' in 2 hours. So every two hour
session
> > > follows that pattern, does it.....
> >
> > No, you're the one who believes in patterns. Remember? Have you
> > completely lost it now?I guess Rob now sees the error in his thinking.
Hmmmm....You haven't figured it out yet. You do the 'thinking' and
it's what makes you wear all that egg. I 'know' things, which is why
I'm not only confident (very unlike you and your nervous tainted
replies) but I'm right!
> >
> > > You are SO caught with your pants
> > > down here, your momma couldn't save your ass on this one!!
> >
> > Boy, I guess Rob's frustration has reached epic levels. How
sweet it is ...
It does appear you are very used to that position. What'd you do,
lose the belt??!
> If you call running around naked with your pants down sweet,
you're the sweetest!
Your frusration is showing again little man. Not at all surprising.
Aren'
t you happy that with the pants down, you can now take that "I AM A
SAP" sign off your forehead!!! HAHAHA!!!!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> > > > > Sorry, but I just proved you were a liar in the previus
post.
> > Add
> > > > to
> > > > > that ... it appears RRC does not have .50 FPDW. Oh, what
> about
> > > > 30>22.
> > > > > Do I need to go on?
> > > >
> > > > Always using 'previous posts' and 'previous threads'
without
> > > > explanations to escape from replying to the issues that
> obviously
> > > > turn your face red. You lied, you got caught again. Admit
it
> like
> > a
> > > > man even if you're a geeky one.
> > >
> > > This is humerous. You were wrong about .50 FPDW, your con is
in
> > > shambles and your words are the same old hollow one we've all
> seen
> > > before. How sweet it is ...
> >
> > Where'd you hear there was no 50c FPDW.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/message/59277
>
> > I got a call directly from 2
> > people who were at the machines. Try again. But this isn't
> > surprising. You're never right and always listen to losers who
get
> > their info from Jean Scott.
>
> Or, maybe it was a mistake that was quickly correctly. In any
event,
> I'll check on it in a month when I get back and see for myself.
I'd
> prefer that you were right.
There's your mistake---listening to John "I wanted to be like
Skippy
Hughes but I just couldn't muster up the right amount of moronic
BS"
Kelly.
We'll see.
>
> Does anyone else find it interesting that two people, playing
what
> Rob would call losing plays, turn around and call him. Hmmmmmmmm.
One of your ongoing dummy traits: Jumping to conclusions and
looking
stupid in the process. Who said they were playing? It was during
the
Grand Opening party before all the losers came in at midnight, and
the machines didn't get turned on for the VIP's until 11:30----an
hour after I received my report.
I see, they just wandered up to the positive plays by accident. LMAO.
>
> > > I guess mental retardation covers more than illogic. Here,
little
> > > Robbie forgets the discussion we had just a couple a days
ago.
I
> > > showed beyond any doubt that never holding a card, simply
> pressing
> > > deal/draw every time, yields "luck is the only way anyone
EVER
> gets
> > a
> > > winning hand!" Anything else brings skill into the equation.
> >
> > Common sense has nothing to do with skill, and that's what
99.99%
> of
> > video poker holds are. You fools like to make believe it's
tougher
> > than it really is to help your ego along. That's your geek
problem
> to
> > deal with.
>
> LMAO. It doesn't matter whether it's "common sense" or mastery of
> expert play, it still skill. And, it still PROVES that your
statment, "luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a winning hand!",
is
wrong.
Just as I said---the geeks take simple common sense as some sort of
invisible skill. You have no knowledge of what the deal's gonna
bring
nor the draw. Luck drops the cards on you, not skill. A monkey can
be
trained to play vp.
OK, then were back to just pressing deal/draw to avoid all the extra
time pressing the hold keys. If that's what you want everyone to do,
then I think you'll become the laughing stock of the VP world. PS.
With your exposed, you probably will be anyway.
And 'expert play'? HA! that's a joke. What few
hands constitute people like you to make believe you're some sort
of
trail-blazing 'experts' in skill are peanuts compared to the skill
required in my strategy of determining where and when to use
special
plays or not. But I get it---you fools need to think you're doing
something extraordinary to make up for that which you lack in real
life.
Notice all the words of frustration. Robbie has no answer to this
situation. You either use some skill and hold cards, or you don't and
leave it all up to luck.
> > > > > > But let's look at the stupidity of your statement. At
> > > > > > 98.5% I need 'good luck' to win $1500 in an approx. 2
hour
> > > > session.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yup.
> > > > >
> > > > > > But at 100.8% for 2 hours you don't require any good
luck
> at
> > > all!
> > > > >
> > > > > Nope. Just average luck.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Nuff said.
> > > > >
> > > > > ... to expose your con again. How sweet it is ...
> > > >
> > > > Thank you. You just made your stupidest argument more
stupid.
> > First
> > > > you say it's the 'long-run' that's important.
> > >
> > > No, it's getting the best possible results OVER TIME.
> > >
> > > > Now it's not
> > >
> > > This is an example where Robbie asserts a lie and then bases
the
> > rest
> > > of his addiction-driven reply on that lie.
> >
> > Yes, we get it. First it is then it isn't.
>
> He's doing it again. Don't you just love it when he demonstrates
> immediately how right I am. Even if we hadn't all seen it a
hundred
> times, Rob comes through and does it again. How sweet it is ...
So nice of you to EXPLAIN what you mean instead of making believe
what you're talking about. You're really sinking in the debate
process. First in the other thread all you can do is repeat my
comments to you back to me, essentially saying 'Uncle'. Then when
you
can't figure out what to say you use 'riv'. Once in a while when
lost, you ramble as in the above....at first thinking you had a
thought, but when it passed you were too dumb to start over again
with an 'riv'.
Robbie's frustration mounts. More words = more frustration. Come on,
tell us again about the Rob Singer Deal/Draw VP Strategy.
> > > > --you
> > > > simply need 'average luck' in 2 hours. So every two hour
> session
> > > > follows that pattern, does it.....
> > >
> > > No, you're the one who believes in patterns. Remember? Have
you
> > > completely lost it now?
>
> I guess Rob now sees the error in his thinking.Hmmmm....You haven't figured it out yet. You do the 'thinking' and
it's what makes you wear all that egg. I 'know' things, which is
why
I'm not only confident (very unlike you and your nervous tainted
replies) but I'm right!
The hollow words reappear. Let's see ... all you ever do is babble
while I constantly support everything I say with references and
indisputable evidence. I can tell by your frustrated responses that
you know this as well. How sweet it is ...
> > > > > Always using 'previous posts' and 'previous threads'
without
> > > > > explanations to escape from replying to the issues that
> > obviously
> > > > > turn your face red. You lied, you got caught again. Admit
it
> > like
> > > a
> > > > > man even if you're a geeky one.
> > > >
> > > > This is humerous. You were wrong about .50 FPDW, your con
is
in
> > > > shambles and your words are the same old hollow one we've
all
> > seen
> > > > before. How sweet it is ...
> > >
> > > Where'd you hear there was no 50c FPDW.
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/message/59277
> >
> > > I got a call directly from 2
> > > people who were at the machines. Try again. But this isn't
> > > surprising. You're never right and always listen to losers
who
> get
> > > their info from Jean Scott.
> >
> > Or, maybe it was a mistake that was quickly correctly. In any
> event,
> > I'll check on it in a month when I get back and see for myself.
I'd
> > prefer that you were right.
>
> There's your mistake---listening to John "I wanted to be like
Skippy
> Hughes but I just couldn't muster up the right amount of moronic
BS"
> Kelly.We'll see.
> >
> > Does anyone else find it interesting that two people, playing
what
> > Rob would call losing plays, turn around and call him.
Hmmmmmmmm.
>
> One of your ongoing dummy traits: Jumping to conclusions and
looking
> stupid in the process. Who said they were playing? It was during
the
> Grand Opening party before all the losers came in at midnight,
and
> the machines didn't get turned on for the VIP's until 11:30----an
> hour after I received my report.I see, they just wandered up to the positive plays by accident.
LMAO.
No, I was on the phone for over an hour with them as they described
the place to me---a place, BTW, that you would never feel comfortable
at because it is so luxiurious.
> >
> > > > I guess mental retardation covers more than illogic. Here,
> little
> > > > Robbie forgets the discussion we had just a couple a days
ago.
> I
> > > > showed beyond any doubt that never holding a card, simply
> > pressing
> > > > deal/draw every time, yields "luck is the only way anyone
EVER
> > gets
> > > a
> > > > winning hand!" Anything else brings skill into the equation.
> > >
> > > Common sense has nothing to do with skill, and that's what
99.99%
> > of
> > > video poker holds are. You fools like to make believe it's
> tougher
> > > than it really is to help your ego along. That's your geek
> problem
> > to
> > > deal with.
> >
> > LMAO. It doesn't matter whether it's "common sense" or mastery
of
> > expert play, it still skill. And, it still PROVES that your
> statment, "luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a winning
hand!",
is
> wrong.
>
> Just as I said---the geeks take simple common sense as some sort
of
> invisible skill. You have no knowledge of what the deal's gonna
bring
> nor the draw. Luck drops the cards on you, not skill. A monkey
can
be
> trained to play vp.OK, then were back to just pressing deal/draw to avoid all the
extra
time pressing the hold keys. If that's what you want everyone to
do,
then I think you'll become the laughing stock of the VP world. PS.
With your exposed, you probably will be anyway.> And 'expert play'? HA! that's a joke. What few
> hands constitute people like you to make believe you're some sort
of
> trail-blazing 'experts' in skill are peanuts compared to the
skill
> required in my strategy of determining where and when to use
special
> plays or not. But I get it---you fools need to think you're doing
> something extraordinary to make up for that which you lack in
real
> life.
Notice all the words of frustration. Robbie has no answer to this
situation. You either use some skill and hold cards, or you don't
and leave it all up to luck.
One thing you're pointing out for all of us is how you even use your
DENIAL trait in a discussion of playing cards. You think common sense
holds are a "skill" (chuckle chuckle!) when if you were prepared to
play in the first place, you'd simply react to hold the common sense
cards. Just how dum ARE you...or rather, how much do you need to
build your confidence back up after I chopped you off at the knees on
this one again?
> > He's doing it again. Don't you just love it when he
demonstrates
> > immediately how right I am. Even if we hadn't all seen it a
hundred
> > times, Rob comes through and does it again. How sweet it is ...
>
> So nice of you to EXPLAIN what you mean instead of making believe
> what you're talking about. You're really sinking in the debate
> process. First in the other thread all you can do is repeat my
> comments to you back to me, essentially saying 'Uncle'. Then when
you
> can't figure out what to say you use 'riv'. Once in a while when
> lost, you ramble as in the above....at first thinking you had a
> thought, but when it passed you were too dumb to start over again
> with an 'riv'.Robbie's frustration mounts. More words = more frustration. Come
on, tell us again about the Rob Singer Deal/Draw VP Strategy.
I look at it as my boring constant supremacy over you. Of course you
wouldn't, as seen by your avoiding the issue and instead
claiming 'frustration. Each time you perform that act you lose
credibility, and i wouldn't be surprised if you yourself are becoming
less and less confident with each shot I take at your heart!
> > > > > --you
> > > > > simply need 'average luck' in 2 hours. So every two hour
> > session
> > > > > follows that pattern, does it.....
> > > >
> > > > No, you're the one who believes in patterns. Remember? Have
you
> > > > completely lost it now?
> >
> > I guess Rob now sees the error in his thinking.
>
> Hmmmm....You haven't figured it out yet. You do the 'thinking'
and
> it's what makes you wear all that egg. I 'know' things, which is
why
> I'm not only confident (very unlike you and your nervous tainted
> replies) but I'm right!The hollow words reappear. Let's see ... all you ever do is babble
while I constantly support everything I say with references and
indisputable evidence. I can tell by your frustrated responses that
you know this as well. How sweet it is ...
More & more, this gets easier and easier to almost rape you where you
stand! You stand around with your pants down and that's what happens.
At least show some dignity so I don't keep embarrassing you so often.
You lack facts, lack self-confidence, lack the proper words, and lack
intelligence in so many subjects that I feel like I'm back in High
School again using a nerd as my whipping post!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> > > > > I guess mental retardation covers more than illogic.
Here,
> > little
> > > > > Robbie forgets the discussion we had just a couple a days
> ago.
> > I
> > > > > showed beyond any doubt that never holding a card, simply
> > > pressing
> > > > > deal/draw every time, yields "luck is the only way anyone
> EVER
> > > gets
> > > > a
> > > > > winning hand!" Anything else brings skill into the
equation.
> > > >
> > > > Common sense has nothing to do with skill, and that's what
> 99.99%
> > > of
> > > > video poker holds are. You fools like to make believe it's
> > tougher
> > > > than it really is to help your ego along. That's your geek
> > problem
> > > to
> > > > deal with.
> > >
> > > LMAO. It doesn't matter whether it's "common sense" or
mastery
of
> > > expert play, it still skill. And, it still PROVES that your
> > statment, "luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a winning
hand!",
> is
> > wrong.
> >
> > Just as I said---the geeks take simple common sense as some
sort
of
> > invisible skill. You have no knowledge of what the deal's gonna
> bring
> > nor the draw. Luck drops the cards on you, not skill. A monkey
can
> be
> > trained to play vp.
>
> OK, then were back to just pressing deal/draw to avoid all the
extra
> time pressing the hold keys. If that's what you want everyone to
do,
> then I think you'll become the laughing stock of the VP world.
PS.
> With your con exposed, you probably will be anyway.
I should have said "are" instead "will be".
>
> > And 'expert play'? HA! that's a joke. What few
> > hands constitute people like you to make believe you're some
sort
> of
> > trail-blazing 'experts' in skill are peanuts compared to the
skill
> > required in my strategy of determining where and when to use
> special
> > plays or not. But I get it---you fools need to think you're
doing
> > something extraordinary to make up for that which you lack in
real
> > life.
>
> Notice all the words of frustration. Robbie has no answer to this
> situation. You either use some skill and hold cards, or you don't
and leave it all up to luck.One thing you're pointing out for all of us is how you even use
your
DENIAL trait in a discussion of playing cards.
LMAO. You can't scramble out of this one. You either hold cards and
exercise some kind of skill or you don't. It's really very simple.
The fact that it destroys your claims that VP is ALL luck is just the
icing on the cake.
You think common sense
holds are a "skill" (chuckle chuckle!) when if you were prepared to
play in the first place, you'd simply react to hold the common
sense
cards.
React is just another word for determining the best cards to hold.
It's a SKILL and the quicker you react, the better your skill. Did I
mention scrambling?
Just how dum ARE you...or rather, how much do you need to
build your confidence back up after I chopped you off at the knees
on
this one again?
LMAO. Did I mention scrambling?
>
> > > He's doing it again. Don't you just love it when he
demonstrates
> > > immediately how right I am. Even if we hadn't all seen it a
> hundred
> > > times, Rob comes through and does it again. How sweet it
is ...
> >
> > So nice of you to EXPLAIN what you mean instead of making
believe
> > what you're talking about. You're really sinking in the debate
> > process. First in the other thread all you can do is repeat my
> > comments to you back to me, essentially saying 'Uncle'. Then
when
> you
> > can't figure out what to say you use 'riv'. Once in a while
when
> > lost, you ramble as in the above....at first thinking you had a
> > thought, but when it passed you were too dumb to start over
again
> > with an 'riv'.
>
> Robbie's frustration mounts. More words = more frustration. Come
on, tell us again about the Rob Singer Deal/Draw VP Strategy.I look at it as my boring constant supremacy over you. Of course
you
wouldn't, as seen by your avoiding the issue and instead
claiming 'frustration. Each time you perform that act you lose
credibility, and i wouldn't be surprised if you yourself are
becoming
less and less confident with each shot I take at your heart!
More words = more frustration.
>
> > > > > > --you
> > > > > > simply need 'average luck' in 2 hours. So every two
hour
> > > session
> > > > > > follows that pattern, does it.....
> > > > >
> > > > > No, you're the one who believes in patterns. Remember?
Have
> you
> > > > > completely lost it now?
> > >
> > > I guess Rob now sees the error in his thinking.
> >
> > Hmmmm....You haven't figured it out yet. You do the 'thinking'
and
> > it's what makes you wear all that egg. I 'know' things, which
is
> why
> > I'm not only confident (very unlike you and your nervous
tainted
> > replies) but I'm right!
>
> The hollow words reappear. Let's see ... all you ever do is
babble
> while I constantly support everything I say with references and
> indisputable evidence. I can tell by your frustrated responses
that
> you know this as well. How sweet it is ...
More & more, this gets easier and easier to almost rape you where
you
stand! You stand around with your pants down and that's what
happens.
At least show some dignity so I don't keep embarrassing you so
often.
You lack facts, lack self-confidence, lack the proper words, and
lack
intelligence in so many subjects that I feel like I'm back in High
School again using a nerd as my whipping post!
More words = more frustration. And, particularly the old high school
bully stories. How sweet it is ...
Common sense has nothing to do with skill, and that's what 99.99%
of video poker holds are. You fools like to make believe it's tougher
than it really is to help your ego along. That's your geek problem to
deal with.
LMAO. It doesn't matter whether it's "common sense" or mastery of
expert play, it still skill. And, it still PROVES that your
statment, "luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a winning hand!", is
wrong.
> > >
> > > Just as I said---the geeks take simple common sense as some
sort
> of
> > > invisible skill. You have no knowledge of what the deal's
gonna
> > bring
> > > nor the draw. Luck drops the cards on you, not skill. A
monkey
> can
> > be
> > > trained to play vp.
> >
> > OK, then were back to just pressing deal/draw to avoid all the
> extra time pressing the hold keys. If that's what you want
everyone to do, then I think you'll become the laughing stock of the
VP world. PS. With your con exposed, you probably will be anyway. I
should have said "are" instead "will be".
For all the thick nerds out there: I took a good dump this morning.
Now everyone knows anything having to do with the human body involves
a plethora of mathematics. Just like the dicker says video poker is
comprised of. So he wants to believe holding Ace high is mathematical
skill and not common sense. Maybe it makes him feel like a genius or
something--who knows? Now back to my dump. Was that skill....was my
name Einstein while on the pretty little toilet seat---or was I LUCKY
to get rid of the putrified & toxified cheese raviolis from last
night in one fell swoop? That's why he's a dufus.
> > > And 'expert play'? HA! that's a joke. What few
> > > hands constitute people like you to make believe you're some
sort
> > of
> > > trail-blazing 'experts' in skill are peanuts compared to the
> skill
> > > required in my strategy of determining where and when to use
> > special
> > > plays or not. But I get it---you fools need to think you're
doing
> > > something extraordinary to make up for that which you lack in
> real
> > > life.
> >
> > Notice all the words of frustration. Robbie has no answer to
this
> > situation. You either use some skill and hold cards, or you
don't
> and leave it all up to luck.
>
> One thing you're pointing out for all of us is how you even use
your
> DENIAL trait in a discussion of playing cards.LMAO. You can't scramble out of this one. You either hold cards and
exercise some kind of skill or you don't. It's really very simple.
The fact that it destroys your claims that VP is ALL luck is just
the icing on the cake.
> You think common sense
> holds are a "skill" (chuckle chuckle!) when if you were prepared
to
> play in the first place, you'd simply react to hold the common
sense
> cards.React is just another word for determining the best cards to hold.
It's a SKILL and the quicker you react, the better your skill. Did
I mention scrambling?
> Just how dum ARE you...or rather, how much do you need to
> build your confidence back up after I chopped you off at the
knees
on
> this one again?LMAO. Did I mention scrambling?
Did I mention chopping?
> > Robbie's frustration mounts. More words = more frustration.
Come
> on, tell us again about the Rob Singer Deal/Draw VP Strategy.
>
> I look at it as my boring constant supremacy over you. Of course
you
> wouldn't, as seen by your avoiding the issue and instead
> claiming 'frustration. Each time you perform that act you lose
> credibility, and i wouldn't be surprised if you yourself are
becoming
> less and less confident with each shot I take at your heart!More words = more frustration.
What was that word...Chopping!
> More & more, this gets easier and easier to almost rape you where
you
> stand! You stand around with your pants down and that's what
happens.
> At least show some dignity so I don't keep embarrassing you so
often.
> You lack facts, lack self-confidence, lack the proper words, and
lack
> intelligence in so many subjects that I feel like I'm back in
High
> School again using a nerd as my whipping post!
More words = more frustration. And, particularly the old high
school bully stories. How sweet it is ...
Yup! Looks like it was YOU who took your own pants down to get raped
here! Of course, at my command....
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> Common sense has nothing to do with skill, and that's what 99.99%
of video poker holds are. You fools like to make believe it's
tougher
than it really is to help your ego along. That's your geek problem
to
deal with.
> LMAO. It doesn't matter whether it's "common sense" or mastery of
expert play, it still skill. And, it still PROVES that your
statment, "luck is the only way anyone EVER gets a winning hand!",
is
wrong.
The truth wins out.
> > > >
> > > > Just as I said---the geeks take simple common sense as some
> sort
> > of
> > > > invisible skill. You have no knowledge of what the deal's
gonna
> > > bring
> > > > nor the draw. Luck drops the cards on you, not skill. A
monkey
> > can
> > > be
> > > > trained to play vp.
> > >
> > > OK, then were back to just pressing deal/draw to avoid all
the
> > extra time pressing the hold keys. If that's what you want
everyone to do, then I think you'll become the laughing stock of
the
VP world. PS. With your con exposed, you probably will be anyway. I
should have said "are" instead "will be".For all the thick nerds out there: I took a good dump this morning.
We're all very impressed. For your information, more humans do that
every day.
Now everyone knows anything having to do with the human body
involves
a plethora of mathematics. Just like the dicker says video poker is
comprised of. So he wants to believe holding Ace high is
mathematical
skill and not common sense.
Denial. The #1 trait of a con man. It's a skill, like it or not. I
said nothing about "mathematical" skill.
Maybe it makes him feel like a genius or
something--who knows? Now back to my dump. Was that skill....was my
name Einstein while on the pretty little toilet seat---or was I
LUCKY
to get rid of the putrified & toxified cheese raviolis from last
night in one fell swoop? That's why he's a dufus.
ROTFLMAO. Robbie is comparing the MENTAL process of selecting cards
to taking a dump. Although, I can see why these two are synonymous
for Robbie, after all, most of what he posts is pure sh*t.
> > > > And 'expert play'? HA! that's a joke. What few
> > > > hands constitute people like you to make believe you're
some
> sort
> > > of
> > > > trail-blazing 'experts' in skill are peanuts compared to
the
> > skill
> > > > required in my strategy of determining where and when to
use
> > > special
> > > > plays or not. But I get it---you fools need to think you're
> doing
> > > > something extraordinary to make up for that which you lack
in
> > real
> > > > life.
> > >
> > > Notice all the words of frustration. Robbie has no answer to
this
> > > situation. You either use some skill and hold cards, or you
don't
> > and leave it all up to luck.
> >
> > One thing you're pointing out for all of us is how you even use
> your
> > DENIAL trait in a discussion of playing cards.
>
> LMAO. You can't scramble out of this one. You either hold cards
and
> exercise some kind of skill or you don't. It's really very
simple.
> The fact that it destroys your claims that VP is ALL luck is just
the icing on the cake.
Robbie, must have finished his dump and couldn't come up with another
reply.
>
> > You think common sense
> > holds are a "skill" (chuckle chuckle!) when if you were
prepared
to
> > play in the first place, you'd simply react to hold the common
> sense
> > cards.
>
> React is just another word for determining the best cards to
hold.
> It's a SKILL and the quicker you react, the better your skill.
Did
I mention scrambling?
Come on little man, eat something. We miss those mental/anal gems of
yours.
>
> > Just how dum ARE you...or rather, how much do you need to
> > build your confidence back up after I chopped you off at the
knees
> on
> > this one again?
>
> LMAO. Did I mention scrambling?Did I mention chopping?
Right on cue. Did this come with a fart?
>
> > > Robbie's frustration mounts. More words = more frustration.
Come
> > on, tell us again about the Rob Singer Deal/Draw VP Strategy.
> >
> > I look at it as my boring constant supremacy over you. Of
course
> you
> > wouldn't, as seen by your avoiding the issue and instead
> > claiming 'frustration. Each time you perform that act you lose
> > credibility, and i wouldn't be surprised if you yourself are
> becoming
> > less and less confident with each shot I take at your heart!
>
> More words = more frustration.What was that word...Chopping!
How do you live with the constant smell?
> > More & more, this gets easier and easier to almost rape you
where
> you
> > stand! You stand around with your pants down and that's what
> happens.
> > At least show some dignity so I don't keep embarrassing you so
> often.
> > You lack facts, lack self-confidence, lack the proper words,
and
> lack
> > intelligence in so many subjects that I feel like I'm back in
High
> > School again using a nerd as my whipping post!
>
> More words = more frustration. And, particularly the old high
school bully stories. How sweet it is ...Yup! Looks like it was YOU who took your own pants down to get
raped
here! Of course, at my command....
Better check the underwear, I think it's getting a little ripe.