vpFREE2 Forums

Las Vegas Club/Mini-TR & Database Update

I'll check again next week, but the six 16/13/4700 Double Deuces
listed in the DataBase were there a couple of weeks ago.

vpFREE Administrator

···

On 2 Mar 2003 at 23:47, bluestreak86001 graytleegray@ wrote:

Database-this subject came up in Dec/Jan. All the Double Deuces are
16/11/4000, I swear! No change in inventory from November.

If I remember correctly the 16/13/4700 machines are not labelled as double deuces. The 16/11 machines are labelled as double deuces.

Regards
A.P.

···

----- Original Message -----
  From: vpFREEvp
  To: vpFREE
  Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 6:56 PM
  Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Las Vegas Club/Mini-TR & Database Update

  On 2 Mar 2003 at 23:47, bluestreak86001 graytleegray@ wrote:

  > Database-this subject came up in Dec/Jan. All the Double Deuces are
  > 16/11/4000, I swear! No change in inventory from November.

  I'll check again next week, but the six 16/13/4700 Double Deuces
  listed in the DataBase were there a couple of weeks ago.

  vpFREE Administrator

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
  vpFREE Home Page:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE

  vpFREE Links:
  http://www.lvcm.com/tomesims/VP/Links.html

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> Database-this subject came up in Dec/Jan. All the Double Deuces

are

> 16/11/4000, I swear! No change in inventory from November.

I'll check again next week, but the six 16/13/4700 Double Deuces
listed in the DataBase were there a couple of weeks ago.

I suspect that the problem results from the Downtown Deuces at LVC
(16/13-4700) being mislabeled as "Deuces Wild" and scattered about
separately rather than being in a bank together. People who look for
the 16/13-4700's under the "Double Deuces" name will not find them.
Instead, they'll find only the 16/11's.

Pete

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vpFREEvp <vpfreevp@y...> wrote:

On 2 Mar 2003 at 23:47, bluestreak86001 graytleegray@ wrote: