In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:19:25 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
LGTVegas@gmail.com writes:
Why must Dan Paymar "keep it non-personal" when
others on the list may write whatever they want?
What gave you that idea?
Karen
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Karen:
I asked the question because, of the tens-of-thousands of posts, I estimate
that more than half include personal comments (of one kind or another). My
question was regarding the vpFREE administrator's comment (to Paymar) "Of
course you are/were allowed to respond, if you keep it non-personal ..."
Later, the vpFREE administrator said (to me), "There isn't a 'keep it
non-personal' rule."
So, now I am confused.
Dan Paymar was asked to "....keep it non-personal...." when there is no such
rule.
I hope that explains what gave me the idea that the vpFREE administrator was
discriminating against Dan Paymar.
Curtis
On 12/16/05, krallison416@aol.com <krallison416@aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 12/16/2005 8:19:25 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
LGTVegas@gmail.com writes:Why must Dan Paymar "keep it non-personal" when
others on the list may write whatever they want?What gave you that idea?
Karen
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]